Friday, December 21, 2007

Europe Will be a Muslim Continent

It’s become evident that the West is going to do nothing about Iran’s imminent acquisition of nuclear weapons. The NIE simply supplies the fig leaf, a nice little rationale for a done deal.

Meanwhile, Europe is being rapidly Islamized. The EU and the USA pretend that there’s nothing going on, but the Muslims are well aware of what’s happening, and state their goals clearly.

And not just the Wahhabi Sunnis of the Muslim Brotherhood, but also the Shiite theocrats of Iran. According to AKI:

Iran: Europe will become a Muslim continent, says Khamenei’s spokesman

Ayatollah Seyyed Ali KhameneiEurope will eventually become a Muslim continent, according to a representative of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei.

“In a dozen years, Europe will be an Islamic continent,” said Rasul Jalilzadeh on Friday as he was speaking to the basiji, a voluntary organisation in the capital Tehran.

Actually, the Basiji are a “volunteer” goon squad of Islamic thugs. Their mission is to rough up women who don’t wear the hijab and torture journalists in prison.

“The Islamisation of the European continent is imminent and this step favours the arrival of the Mahdi,” he said, referring to the 12th imam of Shiite Islam.

It’s important to remember what will portend the arrival of the Twelfth Imam: massive, violent chaos.

First we must have the chaos, and then #12 brings an end to the chaos:
- - - - - - - - -
Shiites believe that the Imam Mahdi, who disappeared as an adolescent, will return to bring an end to chaos and bring universal justice.

Rasul Jalilzadeh believes that “the Islamisation of Europe is one of the consequences of the Islamic revolution in Iran” in that “the messages and values that this revolution has transmitted to the Europeans, to convince them “to abandon their current faiths and convert to Shiite Islam.”

Mr. Jalilzadeh is wrong about one thing: most Europeans already have abandoned their current faiths. The Shiites and the Sunnis are simply engaging in a little friendly competition to see which version of Islam will be the new European faith.

Just think about what this man is saying:

  • There will come a time of war, destruction, and chaos.
  • It is the duty of every devout Shiite Muslim to hasten that day.
  • Then the Twelfth Imam will return.
  • Then the world will become an Islamic paradise.

The people who believe this dangerous nonsense rule a country with a population of almost seventy million people, and they want to get their hands on nuclear weapons.

And we’re going to let them.

Hat tip: insubria.


Zenster said...

It goes a wee bit beyond this. One must never forget that the 12th Imam will only appear at a time when it seems as though total catastrophe is about to befall Iran. Thus, so as to hasten this 12th Imam's arrival, it is in Iran's interest to provoke the most cataclysmic events imaginable. Few other actions so perfectly define such circumstances as nuclear war. Remember, the mullahs will do anything to make the 12th Imam come out of his well.

We are dealing with madmen who do not even flinch at the notion of turning an entire nation into one massive suicide bomber. There can be no retaliation or response to such unbridled insanity. Only preemption has any applicability in this case. That our intelligence communities along with Bush, Rice and all our other political elites have opted to ignore this horrendous fact represents a fundamental abdication of responsibility and outright betrayal of everything that America stands for. It is tantamount to treason.

Wimbledon Womble said...

Islam and the Mahdi can kiss... never mind.

Besides, Europe will go Sunni not Shiite, moron. The Iranians are even on the wrong side of Islamic demographics and immigration patterns. What losers!

Charlemagne said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Charlemagne said...

To place this comment in context; what if you had the opportunity to remove Hitler before 1939? How much suffering and bloodshed would have been spared?

One of the members of the CVF has an apt personal statement in the form of a quote by Edmund Burke: "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

Alexis said...

Sometimes, the ballot is a more effective weapon than the bullet. In retrospect, the most effective means to prevent Hitler from taking power would have been to promote a German political party that could defeat the Nazis and the Communists at the polls.

I would argue against any criminal activity against radical Muslim imams, however tempting it may be. Instead, they should become the focus of nonviolent demonstrations and public relations campaigns. The key must be to convince ordinary people that (1) sharia is a danger to them and (2) they can do something about it. I think it is more important to remove governments that shelter radical imams, for these imams can't accomplish much of anything without the connivance of collaborationist governments.

Once European public opinion is mobilized against Islamist imperialism and anti-imperialist political parties are elected, Europe will be part of the way to victory against Islamist tyranny. Assassins typically create sympathy for the other side; it's wiser to make the Islamists and their Quislings look bad instead.

Zenster said...

Charlemagne: To place this comment in context; what if you had the opportunity to remove Hitler before 1939? How much suffering and bloodshed would have been spared?

Without suggesting anything in regard to these particular individuals, permit me to say that if the following list of Islamic leaders, clerics, scholars and financiers were no longer in a position to propel the cause of jihad, much would change overnight:

1. Ayman al-Zawahiri
2. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
3. Ayatollah Kahmeini
4. Mullah Muhammad Omar
5. Abu Bakar Ba'asyir (Bashir)
6. Moqtada Sadr
7. Abu Hamza al-Masri
8. Mullah Krekar (AKA: Abu Sayyid Qutb)
9. Khaled Meshal
10. Sheikh Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah
11. Ismail Haniya
12. Mohammed Abbas
13. Yusuf al-Qaradawi
14. Tariq Ramadan
15. Sheikh Taj al-Din al-Hilali
16. imam Omar Bakri Muhammed Fustuq
17. imam Abdel-Samie Mahmoud Ibrahim Moussa
18. imam Sheikh SyeSyed Mubarik Ali Gilani
19. Sheikh Abdullah al-Faisal
20. Sheik Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi
21. Dr. Mahmoud al-Zahar
22. Prince Sultan Ibn Abd al-Aziz
23. Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdulaziz
24. Prince Nayef bin Abdulaziz
25. Muhammad Taqi Usmani
26. Yasin al Qadi — Saudi terrorist financier
27. Imad Mugniyah, — Iranian master terrorist
28. Sheikh Abdullah bin Jibreen — top Wahabbi cleric
29. Sheikh Saleh Al-Fawzan — top Wahabbi cleric
30. Sheikh Nasser Al-Omar — top Wahabbi cleric
31. Sheikh Essa
32. Abu Waleed Ansari
33. Abu Yahya al-Libbi
34. Maulana Ilyas Kashmiri
35. Ahmed Abu Laban — DEAD — January 19, 2007
36. Sheikh Abu Yahya al-Libi (al Qaeda CEO)
37. Sheikh Abdel-Aziz Al al-Sheikh — Saudi Grand Mufti
38. Ramadan Shalah — Islamic Jihad leader
39. Ali Abdullah Saleh – Yemini President
40. Sheikh Ibrahim Al-Ghaith — head of SA’s Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice.

Should these few dozen people no longer influence the course of Islamic jihad, untold thousands, if not MILLIONS of lives, both Infidel and Muslim alike might be saved. Instead, left unchecked, this list of terrorists will most likely be responsible for the West initiating a Muslim nuclear holocaust. As the primary drivers of radical Islam, these fanatics simply refuse to consider any other outcome.

Other Westerners have observed that it would be churlish to incur even the slightest delay in these ruthless individuals accessing their ever-so-adored paradise. Far worse is that not doing so may well guarantee the needless deaths of MILLIONS of Muslims and Infidels alike. I sincerely hope this can be avoided. Regretfully, all indications reveal that Islam simply will not have it any other way.

Athos said...

Zenster has it right. BTW, your "It goes a wee bit beyond this," shows a Scottish descent? It creeps into my speech now and then.

The lapping waves should warn the citizens of Atlantis of what seems inevitable, demographically speaking if nothing else. Sadly, post-modern destruction of the happy, healthy, and productive family has doomed the West and, for me at least, the remains of Christendom.

Mr. Smarterthanyou said...

What happens when you live someplace where you would go to jail, simply for saying what Khaddafi and President Achminipud just said?

How do you get yourself out of trouble, how do you avoid that fate when your government is no longer a free democracy or republic, but a dictatorship in total control of what you can say or hear?

What is the answer??? It sure as heck isn't infighting over Odin's freaking cross.

You Euros need to get on some shady websites and start getting black ops books, looks like you will be needing them.

Mr. Smarterthanyou said...


The ballot box is meaningless when the party in power, or the gov't machinery prevents the formation of parties, or blocks out their platforms as hate speech, or generally keeps the population in ignorance. The voting of sheep is pointless.

The way to have kept Hitler out of power would have been for the French to have had the BALLS and decency to not have tried to rape Germany post WWI. Even then, they had another chance, but lacked the BALLS to stop Germany from re-arming in the Ruhr, as per the same treaty.

What we face now cannot be seen as a repeat of Hitler. This is like an alien invasion of pod people, only we all know about the pods, we generally know what they look and sound like, but the cowards in our own society and gov't outlaw discussion of it. They say pods bring diversity, which is good. They set aside jobs and scholorships for them, and have special commissions set up to make sure that no one hurts their feelings on their way to world domination. Now how do you stop that, how would the writers of the Declaration of Independence stop it? With a freaken ballot that the pods and cowards are allowed to vote in?

eatyourbeans said...

In NYC the rat problem is so severe that the owners of small food stores now have cats, which is against Board of Health laws. What else can they do? In Montreal ( I think) the police may not be allowed to use tasers against those resisting arrest except in the presence of trained medical personnel. Lacking one, which is so often the case in the cops' line of work, what are they supposed to do? Stand there? In London, Brussels, Stockholm, Washington, Berlin, Rome, etc, etc, etc, fatuous and ambitious politicians are quick to give themselves the powers and pleasures of government and shirk their primary and fundamental duty to protect the citizenry. No, worse. It is no exaggeration to say that, for all intents and purposes, they have resolved to destroy their citizens.

Sooner or later we will have to do what we must do.

SouthernFriedBear said...


" would the writers of the Declaration of Independence stop it?"

They'd continue to pay tribute at first.

Even though Secretary of State Jefferson declared to Thomas Barclay, American consul to Morocco, in a May 13, 1791, letter of instructions for a new treaty with Morocco that it is "lastly our determination to prefer war in all cases to tribute under any form, and to any people whatever," the United States continued to negotiate for cash settlements. In 1795 alone the United States was forced to pay nearly a million dollars in cash, naval stores, and a frigate to ransom 115 sailors from the dey of Algiers. Annual gifts were settled by treaty on Algiers, Morocco, Tunis, and Tripoli.

The majority of US citizens, past and present, care only about providing for their own. What time they have left over they prefer to use for entertainment and politics be d*mned.

So what moves us (historically speaking)? That's what I want to know.

In the example of the Barbary Pirates above, they brought it on themselves by demanding too much. They pushed things a little too far.

As [President Jefferson] declared in his first annual message to Congress: "To this state of general peace with which we have been blessed, one only exception exists. Tripoli, the least considerable of the Barbary States, had come forward with demands unfounded either in right or in compact, and had permitted itself to denounce war, on our failure to comply before a given day. The style of the demand admitted but one answer. I sent a small squadron of frigates into the Mediterranean. . . ."

We have a history of just sucking it up until the final line is crossed. I had hoped it would be 9/11, but it wasn't so.

What worries me the most is how many in the US will point and laugh at Europe. Asking how they like it now. And yet, we vote in governments that do the same.

I agree with eatyourbeans.

Charlemagne said...

Perhaps it is the Christian tradition that has inculcated in Westerners a revulsion for anything but retaliatory violence, and even then, as noted, it comes only after a lot of hand-wringing over whether or not it is the correct thing to do. There is a nihilistic propensity for we in the West to want to talk, talk, talk while our enemies act.
It is unfortunate that the goal of Islam is either not recognized or not believed by our leadership but it is clear that the current crop of Western leaders intends to do nothing about it short of aiding and abetting it.
Also as noted; going to the ballot box is almost useless when the bureaucracy has created a self-maintaining hegemony over the electorate. Any changes are merely superficial but nothing really changes. Does it?
Even here in the US we routinely lament the inability of our representatives to address our problems but most incumbents manage to get reelected year after year. This is the price of centralization of power.
I only advocate extreme measures as a means to an end, that end being the saving of uncountable numbers of lives, the saving of Western civilization, and hopefully a change to a government whose goals match those of the citizenry.
Even the most recalcitrant in Europe have seen the demographic projections for Europeans and Muslims in Europe and they are definitely not in Europe's favor. Can we afford to wait?
I'm an amateur student of Roman history and can't help but ask myself on occasion, WWRD? What would Rome do? How is it that Rome managed to hold together an empire for so long? It is because they ruthlessly met external threats with force and demanded the Romanization of conquered peoples. Our guilt obsessed culture has lost such confidence and replaced the spread of our superior culture with a mushy multiculturalism too afraid to act in our own self defense.

Zenster said...

Charlemagne: It is unfortunate that the goal of Islam is either not recognized or not believed by our leadership but it is clear that the current crop of Western leaders intends to do nothing about it short of aiding and abetting it.

The words of Srdja Trifkovic ring ever more true:

Those Americans who love their land and who put their families, their neighborhoods and their nations before all others, need to stop the madness. They are normal. Those who tell them that their attachments should be global, that the Marines should patrol the banks of the Euphrates and not those of the Rio Grande, and that their lands and neighborhoods belong to whoever decides to settle in them, are sick and evil. They are jihad’s useful fools, enablers and fellow-travelers.

The elite class has every intention of continuing to “fight” the war on terrorism without naming the enemy, without revealing his beliefs, without unmasking his intentions, without offending his accomplices, without expelling his fifth columnists, and without ever daring to win. Their crime can and must be stopped. The founders of the United States overthrew the colonial government for offenses far lighter than those of which the traitor class is guilty.

[emphasis added]

Unknown said...


The transnational socialists want and need the muscle and chaos brought by the jihaddis of whatever flavor.

Just as the jihaddis need chaos to relaize their version of paradise on earth, so too do the tranzis.

The black-humorous part is that while the tranzis think that they will be able to "restrain" their Islamic allies so as to prevent their swords from slitting the cultured tranzi throats, they are wrong.

Dead wrong, and they'll realize that fact far too late.

We are on own own - plain and simple.

The sooner we realize it, the sooner each of us will start to take the steps - some of which we will find difficult or even loathsome - needed to prevail.

May G-d help us all.

PS: The fact that the list of miscreants in the comment above have not been provided with a permanent, all-expense-paid vacation to the paradise of their choice proves the cowardice, flaccidity and culpability of the West's leadership elites.

Learn to shoot and fight.

Teach others.

Each of us will need those skills.

Alexis said...

The ballot box is meaningless when the party in power, or the gov't machinery prevents the formation of parties, or blocks out their platforms as hate speech, or generally keeps the population in ignorance. The voting of sheep is pointless.

New political parties in Europe face obstacles, but they are hardly the obstacles faced by the MDC in Zimbabwe. Or the political opposition in Russia. The entire idea behind liberal democracy is government based upon the informed consent of the people. So let's inform people.

Let's not give up on free democracy just because governments and media corporations slant the news to suit their own purposes. The power of Radio Television Serbia didn't last forever, after all. Neither will the power of the BBC.

addamstaft said...

I just realized that when we talk of saving Europe (and the USA), Europe and the USA of today is not what we remember it to be. The USA might be a couple of years behind Europe, and some of the details are different, but when we think of Western Civilization, if it was what it used to be, the problems we are facing would be different. As a people who are not in control of their government, in fact seem incapable of even maintaining healthy families, what has happened to Western Civilization? Western Civilization is killing or has killed itself. Others are just stepping into the void.

Islam is changing too. Quickly changing, just like Europe. I’m probably a fool, but I hope Islam falls to Jesus Christ. Islam looks like a house of cards that might easily collapse in a rapidly changing world. I think Western Civilization = Christianity. If the Muslim world became Christian, Western Civilization might survive it’s death in the lives of Europeans and Americans.

Charlemagne said...

From the Brussels Journal