Friday, February 24, 2012

An Unequal and Opposite Reaction

As mentioned here a few days ago, a new “grooming and pimping” trial is currently underway at Liverpool Crown Court.

This is one of the largest cases of its kind ever to come to trial. The total number of defendants in the case is said to be 47, eleven of whom are currently on trial. The behavior of the alleged perpetrators was so heinous and brutal, and the victims of rape and trafficking so young, that the trial looks to be a national sensation in Britain over the next few weeks or months.

What may transform the case from a sensation into the cause of mass unrest is the fact that the perpetrators were all Muslims of Pakistani descent, and their victims were all white girls, some of them as young as thirteen. To avoid inflaming the sentiments of “persons of British background”, the police had originally requested that the news media refrain from covering the trial. The blackout held for about two weeks, until reports from the courtroom finally broke into the MSM this past Monday.

As lurid and horrific details emerged from court testimony, the anger of the native British public became more and more evident in comments on news sites and in letters to the editor. Last night the anger moved beyond words into street violence in one of the neighborhoods where the grooming gangs had operated.

Before it appeared in the MSM, news of what was happening spread via Twitter, Facebook, the nationalist forums and UAF. Rumor had it that there were 300 demonstrators on the scene in Heywood; that a Pakistani take-away had been burnt to the ground; that angry young whites had blocked the street so that fire engines could not get through to fight the fire. When reports of the incident finally made it into a local media article, details of what happened were scant:

Disturbances have broken out in the Heywood area of Rochdale, police have confirmed.

Gangs of youths have congregated and it is believed Asian takeaway businesses have been targeted, sources said.

A spokesman for Greater Manchester Police said: “We became aware of congregations of men gathering in Heywood this evening. We are getting some reports of disturbances.

“There has been no reports of serious injuries. The owner of one takeaway restaurant has had his car attacked.”

This morning the media reports were more informative. Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:

Keep in mind that this trial is only just beginning. The rage that has smoldered for so long within the long-suffering English working class is ready to burst into open flame. It’s no wonder that the authorities wanted to muzzle the media — if this beast breaks its chains, there’s no telling how much damage it might do.

The Daily Mail had a detailed report on last night’s events:

Mob of 200 Youths Pelt Police With Bricks and Smash Up Shops ‘In Anger at On-Going Sex Grooming Trial’

Police were pelted with bricks and other missiles last night as hundreds of youths went on the rampage.

Takeaways were targeted in an evening of disorder understood to be linked to the on-going trial of a suspected grooming gang at Liverpool Crown Court.

A mob of around 200 youths congregated in the centre of the Heywood area of Rochdale, Greater Manchester, last night as trouble began.

One shop-owner told how he was abused by a group of youths , who called him a ‘dirty b*stard’.

A car belonging to a member of the public and three police vehicles were also damaged.

Greater Manchester Police has confirmed more police will be out on patrol today amid fears of a second night of violence.

A 35-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of a public order offence and police assault and a 14-year-old boy was arrested for causing danger to a public highway.

The area became swamped with police in riot vans and the mob of young people was eventually dispersed by officers at about 11pm.

Zeeshan Khokhar, 23, owner of Bits n Pizza, a take-away on Market Street, said he was verbally abused, though his shop was not damaged.

Mr Khokhar said ‘white friends’ came to his shop to protect him as trouble began brewing.

He said: ‘It started about 4pm, kids banging on windows. They were shouting, “Why are you still open you dirty b*******?”.

‘The police came and told us to shut up shop. We are just doing business.

‘Our white friends, they came here and they are protecting us and customers were standing outside our door.

‘They said we have just come to keep an eye on you.

‘But it’s not good, it hurts and we are very worried about what’s going to happen.’

Then there was this ominous statement by Assistant Chief Constable Terry Sweeney:
‘We are monitoring social media sites and ask anybody who is concerned or has information to share with us to go either through their local neighbourhood policing team, Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111 or by GMP using the 101 service.’

That is: the police (and presumably MI5) assign employees to read everything on the EDL forum and the nationalist websites, watch the tweets go by, check out Facebook messages, and presumably read the comments on newspaper sites. Britain has the most highly-developed capabilities for keeping its citizens under surveillance — far more effective than those of China or North Korea — and is now employing them to try to screw the lid down on white Britons so that the situation doesn’t spiral out of control.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Mancunian Matters had more:

Police Attacked by 200 Youths in Rochdale as Sex-Gang Are Trialled

A Greater Manchester policeman is recovering after a mob of 200 youths attacked officers in Heywood, Rochdale, last night.

The violent disorder occurred on Thursday February 23, as groups of youths attacked local takeaways on Bridge Street, surrounding vehicles and threw missiles at police. Forces made numerous appeals to parents to contact their children if they were not home before the clash escalated.


Three police cars were damaged, as well as one member of the public’s, and one officer suffered bruising to his arms and legs.


The EDL denied any involvement in the Heywood disorder.

Some excerpts from The Express:

Patrols Stepped Up After Attacks

More police will be out on patrol in a town where Asian takeaways came under attack.

A mob of around 200 youths congregated in the centre of the Heywood area of Rochdale, Greater Manchester, as trouble began.

The disorder is understood to be linked to an on-going trial of men at Liverpool Crown Court.

Officers were pelted with bricks and other missiles and two arrests were made after windows were damaged at a takeaway on Bridge Street. An officer also suffered bruising to his legs and arms.

More interesting than the news report itself was this reader comment by “wessexwyvern” (24 February 2012 at 7:42 am):

Where have the police been hiding whilst gangs of Asian and Muslim paedophiles around the country groomed and exploited vulnerable children?

This isn’t an isolated case. I’m amazed at just how little violence there has been following some of these cases, which says much for the ability of the native, working class, English community to soak up some extreme provocation from our multi cultural friends and neighbours, and from the indifference of the PC, hamstrung police; who are about as much use as a chocolate fire guard nowadays.

If the actions of these men, and others of their ethnicity and religious persuasion, is an example of what a multi cultural society has to offer then maybe we’d be better off without it.

Finally, a comment on another version of the same news story:

It’s a shame the police don’t take robust action against the racist mussies that infest our country. This has been brewing for years, and it’s only a matter of time before the indigenous Brits say enough is enough.

We have been sold out to the foreign invasion of our country by our own disgusting politicians, we are branded racists at every turn for the slightest mention of the word immigrant, muslim , or black and we are policed to the point of terror. But the same cannot be said for the non whites of this country who are allowed to spew their racist bile with impunity, even whilst beating up a white girl whilst screaming “kill the white b**ch” on the streets of London in broad daylight.

Black MPs are allowed to spew their racist bile on internet sites, so the rest will just follow suit knowing that our spineless authorities will enforce the two tier justice system that exists in this country. Race laws only apply to the white man/women. Inciting religious hatred only applies to the white man/women. Just how long did our treacherous politicians and authorities think they could get away with their treacherous behaviour towards their own people before it blew up in their faces?

Minor spats like the one in Rochdale are just the tip of the ice berg, and it won’t be long before a full scale civil war breaks out. All I hear every day is how we have been sold out by our own politicians in favour of immigrants.

I for one cannot wait for the day we rise up and take our country back.

Yes, that pretty well sums it up.

Next stop: The Discontinuity.

Update: Error in the text corrected, thanks to an anonymous commenter.

Hat tips: Gaia, JP.


Nemesis said...

Something has to start somewhere, sometime. Maybe this trial that is underway and the authorities have been trying to keep hidden from the public is the fuse to light the powderkeg? What is going on over there, particularly in London, cannot continue indefinitely without some kind of backlash. I visited the U.K. in 2008 and I can tell you the streets of London, and the other large cities I visited, are awash with non-Britons. Every native Briton I had a chance conversation with had their own little story about 'cultural enrichment'. Even then, the sense of betrayal by their own government was palpable and I have no doubt that when the backlash begins in earnest, no power on Earth will be able to stop it!

Anonymous said...

Many of us expected that open 'european' resistance would commence in Britain. It appears we were right. Good on ya! This model example of resistance against a desastrous will flash over to the mainland...

Truthiocity said...

The grooming gangs are just the providers. The number of muslim men who have payed them for this vile service is just increadible.

After these girls are passed around to the grooming gangs friends AND MALE RELATIVES. They are put into, as victims have said to the BBC, "REVOLVING DOOR" situations where they have to service men in the "DOUBLE DIGITS" for days and weeks on end.

This indicates that the number of muslim men in Britain who have payed the grooming gangs to allow them to rape these young teenage girls is astronomical.

1 victim + 10 men (smallest double digit) for 1 day = 10 men.

2,000 girls means an absolute minimum of 20,000 men. (but that's just for 1 day each, not the weeks of torture they are put thru)

But its way more than 2000 girls and its WAAAY more than just 1 day each. And 10 is the smallest possible double digit.

2000 girls put into this horror for a week means a minimum of 140,000 men could have participated- just for that 2000 victims alone.

There is only about 700-800k muslim men in Britian and a number of them are children. So as you can see, there is an alarmingly high chance that any muslim man you see in England has participated in this as a consumer.

The math is of course imperfect and that is why I only went on minumums and kept it simple. I heartily encourage anyone to try and figure it out for themselves using any variables they can think of.

These thousands upon thousands of girls and their families lives are perminantly ruined. They will succumb to mental illness, substance abuse and suicide in the years ahead. This has done more damage to more people than the centuries of Viking Raids but in a hundredth of the time.

And there has been absolutley no resistance mounted against it as there would have been to a more overt invasion or campagn of pillaging raids.

That's why the British govenment has been so coy about every aspect of this at every stage of it's unfolding. It is a very real human rights catastrophy for which the British government is both indirectly and directly responsible.

Truthiocity said...

The blog manager has my complete permission to edit my previous comment in any way they see fit.

bilbo said...

and who will the politicians blame?
the englishman, for failing to understand islam.
up the revolution!

Chiu ChunLing said...

It may well be that the slide into "street justice" cannot be averted at this point, but that doesn't mean it is not incumbent on supporters of the CounterJihad to advocate measured reform of their legal institutions as an alternative to uncontrolled social violence.

If the existing police/judicial system can redeem itself by properly enforcing the laws in this case and all similar cases, then resort to large-scale social unrest can be cast as an invalid path for expressing disapproval. But as long as the enforcement agencies of the state are clearly seen to be administrating a double-standard, it is not possible to make the argument that compliance with their directives is in the best interests of the rule of law.

I think that this is an excellent time to point out to officialdom that the direction this goes depends on their demonstration of a commitment to genuinely impartial justice. But it is also important to get the message out (and to be seen as getting the message out) to 'the street' that there may still be alternatives to revolution against the system, if it can meet defined criteria of showing commitment to impartiality.

Among these points is the official response to the current actions by outraged British youth. The police must show no less tolerance for unrest when the motive is concern over the status of native Britons in England than would be shown to unrest over issues touching the feelings of Muslims. But, they need not show any more tolerance. Of significant importance is that the police actually be willing to show their response and the actions to which they are responding, clamping down on video evidence of actual events and claiming they are acting properly does not display good faith.

Chiu Chun-Ling.

bewick said...

Interesting, is it not, that prosecution of such "grooming" gangs so far seems to be confined to my country. It has been recognised here for a number of years -perhaps 10 - but prosecutions have only started in the last 18 months or so.
Consensus is that it is the tip of a very large iceberg involving the Pakistani community in particular.

Surely it is happening elsewhere in Europe and the authorities there have lagged even further behind the UK.That is seriously worrying. Yes I know about the rape epidemic in Norway. Maybe, just maybe, grooming really is confined only to pakistani muslims.

Interesting snippet just now on BBC News. Seems that Pakistan is about to confer voting rights, in Pakistan, to those British residents of Pakistani descent with dual nationality (probably most).Well I suppose that evens things up a little given that thousands and thousands of Pakistanis who have never left Pakistan seem able to manage to vote in Britain.

Ex-Dissident said...

When a single pedophile rapes a child, it is an act of depravity and a crime. He is rightly ostracized by neighbors and relatives, and is rightly sent to jail. When 47 people immigrate to a country and target the native population to commit such acts it is no longer a crime, it is an act of war. 9/11 was not a criminal act, it was an act of war. So was 7/7. People seem to have trouble comprehending this, but it is the truth nonetheless. So for anyone in Britain who tried to give shelter and assist these enemies of Britain, are themselves traitors and should be dealt with accordingly. From my perspective, the 200 demonstrators were out to protect their country and are nothing less than defenders and patriots of their land. I hope whoever in the British law enforcement that reads this site, takes this message to heart.

goethechosemercy said...

In Rochdale:
ALL the perpetrators were Muslim.
ALL the victims were not.

In Chechnya:
ALL the perpetrators were Muslim.
ALL the victims were not.

In Egypt, Nag Hammadi, Maspero,
ALL the perpetrators were Muslim.
ALL the victims were not.

Are we starting to understand a pattern here?
Are we?

American Infidel said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Baron Bodissey said...

American Infidel --

Gates of Vienna's rules about comments require that they be civil, temperate, on-topic, and show decorum. Your comment violated the last of these rules. We keep a PG-13 blog, and exclude foul language, explicit descriptions, and epithets. This is why I deleted your comment.


American Infidel said...

There comes a time in every society when the people simple decide they are no longer willing to [become cacophages] for the sake of political correctness...for England, lets hope that time has come! Politicians, in order to gain and maintain power, brought millions of foriegners to GB who had no desire to assimilate to civil society, that dog has now come back home....

Anonymous said...

Michael Savage said it best, "Only the soccer thugs can save Britain."

Call for more tolerance in your imaginary diversity world where all people are culturally enriched by all the wonderfully compatible immigrants all you like. Dream on.

There are reasons nations have borders. When all is said and done, Savage will remain correct -- only a patriotic nationalist movement will restore Britain.

correcht said...

All western nations now are in the same danger of being compromised by immigrants/refugees, legal or otherwise. Those who do not want to adapt or assimilate should be exported. Certain cults of hate and false superiority must be excised from our enviroment.

Anonymous said...

In spite of all the newfound "enthusiasm" by the enemedia for reporting this situation, it's still absurdly shocking the way they brush over important facts, like when the Express stated: "The disorder is understood to be linked to an on-going trial of men at Liverpool Crown Court."
There's no context given and the trial is only alluded to in the vaguest of terms. They might as well be rioting because of a new ice cream flavour.

And please, stop calling them "Asians"; under some ill advised intent of not offending MUSLIMS, everybody else from Asia is stygmatised along with the perpetrators: Hindus, Bahais, Sikhs, Thai and others are conspicuous by their absence in these matters. It's muslims, muslims and muslims, over and over again. ONWARD BRITTAIN!

Salome said...

I'm with Chiu ChunLing (whose comments I always enjoy reading): we need to advocate peaceful resistance. Civil disobedience, perhaps? On another matter, which won't surprise anyone, I see absolutely nothing of this on the BBC's website. Perhaps the authorities miscalculated--accurate and honest reporting from the beginning might have prevented this matter exploding the way it is threatening to do. The papers could have run editorials on the double standard in law enforcement and the people would have felt they had a voice.

Anonymous said...

Oh, and another thing: Don't dare calling them muslim "extremists"; these guys are muslim MAINSTREAMISTS!


Nemesis said...

Chiu...there will be plenty of time for demanding the repealing of a whole range of laws that have everything to do with the suppression of the native British people, when the elite who have brought this all about are finally cornered! I believe it is fanciful to imagine that peaceful negotiations can come about when one side already has its agenda in place and is quite prepared to use force if necessary to back up the law which they use to protect their holdings. History, in this regard, is replete with so many examples of the outcome from similar struggles.

Common sense argument and peaceful demonstations are not going to win over an entrenched 'elite' that has been steadily building its base since the end of the Second World War. The long march through the institutions by the communist agents has had its rewards which now leads us all to this place in history where individuals will need to decide which side they will take.

When a system of government decides to oppress its own people, for the benefit of 'outsiders' who are encouraged into the country by the hundreds of thousands, then that government and its institutions which have promoted such foolery, will at some time in the future reap the whirlwind.

Anonymous said...

"The total number of plaintiffs in the case is said to be 47, eleven of whom are currently on trial."

This statement makes no sense to me. If there are 47 plaintiffs then they would not be on trial - they would be with the prosecution. Only defendants (or accused) would be standing trial.

PS there is no need to publish this comment.

Baron Bodissey said...

Anonymous 10:09pm --

Thanks for catching that error. I've corrected it.

My brain must have been at the drycleaner's when I typed that!

Chiu ChunLing said...

It is true that there is very little realistic chance of the ruling elite coming to their senses and abandoning their delusional plans for totalitarian control.

However, I think that we should be very clear in saying what positive steps they could take to earn a measure of forgiveness for the damage they've already wrought. I believe that the demands of the Counter-Jihad for impartial justice and equal administration of the law are eminently reasonable, and we can lose nothing by repeating those demands and thus putting the burden on the ruling elite to explain why they 'cannot' comply. I found Jamie's plea for equal justice to be very moving, and I believe representing the interests of the Counter Jihad this way also lends moral clarity to the choice people face.

Either continue to support a throughly corrupt and incompetent regime in their increasingly obvious efforts to destroy the lives of the common people, or demand immediate and substantive action to redress outstanding wrongs...with the understanding that it may fall upon us to provide the actual implementation of justice and the common defense.

Yes, those who march for real, peaceful change consistent with the principles of a free and just nation will not be left to do so in peace. But while we should be prepared to defend ourselves against unjustified violence, we should not neglect to explain that we do not seek it (in this, we are different from the provocateurs of the left). Our demands are eminently reasonable, let us leave no excuse for anyone to claim they did not know the justice of our cause.

Chiu Chun-Ling.

Anonymous said...

I take issue with your choice of words in the direct object of the following sentence:

"Britain has the most highly-developed capabilities for keeping its citizens under surveillance — far more effective than those of China or North Korea…"

The British government calls them "subjects," not "citizens." There _is_ a difference.

Baron Bodissey said...

Anonymous @ 11:35pm --

You are quite right. "Subjects" is the correct word. More precisely, "subjects of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II". I actually already knew that, having lived in England. But I forgot to be precise.

France and the United States have citizens. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has subjects.

Salome said...

Actually, I think there is such a concept as 'UK citizen' now.

Professor L said...

I know this fall under the Just War doctrine of the Church, and I think it telling that we are now in a situation where the Church cannot restrain its followers, but instead demands that they take action.

The war doesn't need to be violent. If the bureaucracy and the Parliament were to open the options of true justice for all, then peace will flow. But that would require a full and true abandonment of multiculturalism. The People of Britain expect nothing less. And even a loyal subject like myself thinks Her Majesty would be remiss were she to fail to intercede in the Parliament on behalf of those the politicians are too given to ignore.

If allowed to proceed to violence, the ability to maintain and bring about justice greatly diminishes, and that is what we are trying to do here. It's better for everyone that justice come sooner, for then the scars will run far less deeply, and the wounds shall heal far more quickly.

Chiu ChunLing said...

Technically, I think that a revolution might be non-violent, but a war always will be. But this revolution is inevitable, it is a restoration of fundamental principles of social order. People uphold the existing social order because it provides for their own interests (whatever those interests may be) better than abandonment of the social order. When you have a ruling elite that have imposed a mutated, anti-social and disorderly 'social order' on the people...that spells trouble.

If those currently hiding behind the threat and use of unlimited violence will openly and honestly eschew the use of the tools of war against their own people, then the revolution need not be violent. But if they continue their pattern of deception and coercion, claiming to guard the law while actually perverting it, casting themselves as the chosen leaders of the people rather than traitors against their nation, and pretending ignorance of the crimes they have themselves encouraged, then they will be the ones that turn this revolution into a war, just as they were the ones that created the conditions for revolution in the first place.

Chiu Chun-Ling.

Nemesis said...

Chiu..yes, the possibility still exists for a 'soft' revolution to occur, but the window of opportunity for such an event is rapidly closing.

I note the current U.K. government is now making noises about the undesirable effects that multiculturalism has had on Britain. Maybe, just maybe this change of direction could be the catalyst for bringing about the start of that 'soft' revolution.

Chiu ChunLing said...

Well, I think that we should just be very clear exactly who has the power to decide, by their actions, exactly how much blood is going to be spilled.

It isn't those who face horrific torture and death anyway if they give in.

Anonymous said...

Your minimum 140,000+ men per week assumes than none of the men where repeat rapists during the week. These muslims could have raped 7 days a week, possibly raping more than one little girl a day.