Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Mass Grooming and Pimping in Rochdale

Cultural Enrichment News

The “grooming and pimping” trial at Liverpool Crown Court has been underway for two weeks, but has only been covered in the national media in Britain for the last day or so.

There’s a reason for that: all the accused rapists and traffickers are “Britons” of Pakistani descent, and all the victims were underage native white girls. The trial has the potential to set off a firestorm in the dry tinder of working-class neighborhoods throughout the culturally enriched areas of major British cities.

As a result, “in the interests of community cohesion”, the police asked the press not to cover the trial. When word of the attempted suppression leaked out, the news spread via the Internet, and various nationalist groups staged a demonstration in front of the Crown Court when the defendants were brought in. Videos of the occasion were posted on YouTube, but nothing appeared in the newspapers.

The story was too hot to be kept quiet indefinitely, and has now broken out into the MSM. The video below comes from Sky News. Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this clip:


Here are some excerpts from the accompanying article. You’ll notice that the case has a Mohammed Coefficient of only 20%:

Grooming Trial: Girls ‘Plied With Drugs’

Eleven men have gone on trial accused of sexually exploiting underage girls who had been plied with drugs and alcohol.

The five youngsters - aged between 13 and 15 when the alleged abuse began - were thought to have been “passed around” among a group of men in Rochdale and sometimes subjected to violence.

A jury at Liverpool Crown Court has been told that one of the girls became pregnant at the age of 13 and had to have an abortion.

The court heard another girl “very quickly became regularly and heavily drunk, depressed, incapable of getting herself out of the situation and resigned to what was happening to her”.

Prosecutor Rachel Smith said: “She did not always cry or protest or tell the men that she did not want to have sex with them although she often did both.

“But she was persistently coerced or forced into submission by them.”

[…]

She also claimed that one man would pull her hair and grab her neck if she resisted and had threatened to cut her with a razor blade if she refused to have sex with him.

[…]

The jury heard police missed an opportunity to intervene earlier when one of the alleged victims disclosed what had happened but officers decided at that stage not to take the matter further.

The defendants are Kabeer Hassan (25), Abdul Aziz (41), Abdul Rauf (43), Mohammed Sajid (35), Adil Khan (42), Abdul Qayyum (43), Mohammed Amin (44), Qamar Shazad (29), Liaquat Shah (41) and Hamid Safi (22). [emphasis added]

Another defendant cannot be named for legal reasons. All deny the charges against them.

Many other men, who have not been identified by the police, are said to have been involved in the exploitation. The trial continues.

The Daily Mail has more details:

Eleven Asian Men ‘Plied Girls of 13 With Drink and Drugs to Use Them for Sex’

A group of 11 Asian men plied girls as young as 13 with drink and drugs so they could use them for sex ‘several times a day’, a court heard today.

The five girls, who were aged between 13 and 15 when the alleged abuse began, were passed around by the men ‘who acted together to sexually exploit the girls’, a trial at Liverpool Crown Court was told.

The offences are said to have happened in and around Rochdale, Greater Manchester, in 2008 and 2009. All the girls were from broken homes and one was in care.

Liverpool Crown Court heard that some of the girls were raped and physically assaulted and some were forced to have sex with ‘several men in a day, several times a week’.

Opening the case, prosecutor Rachel Smith said: ‘Some of you may find what you are about to hear distressing. The events and circumstances described by the girls are at best saddening and at worst shocking in places.

‘No child should be exploited as these girls say they were.’

Miss Smith said the girls were given alcohol, food and money in return for sex but that there were times when violence was used.

‘There were also occasions on which one or more of the girls were so incapacitated by alcohol and/or drugs that they were incapable of having any control over whether or with whom they had sexual intercourse,’ she said.

The court was told that some of the defendants paid the girls and took payments from other men to whom they supplied the girls for sex.

[…]

Miss Smith said: ‘The prosecution say that what this girl was describing was the group activity of a number of adult men, including these defendants, who had spotted the opportunity to sexually exploit children who were vulnerable to that sort of exploitation and were taking it.’

One 13-year-old victim fell pregnant to one of the defendants and had the child aborted, the jury was told.

[…]

One girl, who was 15 when she met the defendants, told police that she was initially ‘flattered’ by the attention of the men. She said that she thought it meant that she was ‘attractive and they thought she was pretty’, the court heard.

However she quickly became regularly heavily drunk, depressed and ‘incapable of getting herself out of the situation’.

She told police: ‘At first I was scared, then after that it....just didn’t bother me anymore...At first I felt dead bad and horrible but then I didn’t feel anything anymore.

‘I didn’t like it but it didn’t bother me....Because, it had been happening every day. Most of the time I was just dead drunk so that when it happened I wouldn’t feel as bad.’

[…]

Another alleged victim, who was 14, said she would get ‘proper hammered’ and she ‘lost count of the number of times she had had sex with men when she did not want to do so’.

Miss Smith said: ‘She was unable to describe all of the men but said she would regularly find herself drunk to near-unconsciousness, waking up with men having sex with her.’

The same girl said she was raped by Abul Aziz in his taxi in December 2009 and afterwards he told her she no longer needed to pay a taxi fare.

I’ve omitted the most sordid portions of the article. See The Daily Mail for the full story.


For a complete listing of previous enrichment news, see The Cultural Enrichment Archives.

Hat tip: Gaia.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

"...had threatened to cut her with a razor blade if she refused to have sex with him."

Just so we ALL understand the real depth of this threat, below is an article with an example of the way that an immigrant Somali girl cut an infidel English girl's face with a razor blade - with the purpose to completely ruin her FACE.

Here, a picture is worth a thousand words:

Supervision order for girl who slashed classmate's face - with picture of slashed face

Egghead

Nemesis said...

I think we can all appreciate the mandatory behaviour that is generally expected from the male Muslim toward the young native white girls of Europe, and any other predominatley white nation that has permitted the followers from the 'religion of peace' to settle within its border.

This could not have occurred just 50 years ago when the Western family was still regarded as worth something. The slow disintegration of family life since then has given us the white female victims that the Muslim now finds so easy to manipulate.

50 years ago, those now being tried for their part in this sordid and degrading criminal enterprise, would have been ejected from the country after serving their time. But, don't hold your breath on that one!

100 years ago, the media would have been whipping the public and the families of the victims into a such a frenzy, that only the promise of a hangman's noose would have quelled it. Again, don't hold your breath on that one!

And so today, we now have the spectacle of the farce that now hides behind human rights, rights which will ensure that when those 'misunderstood Britons' are sentenced, the accommodating Judge will stress that their stay in prison is not to be overly taxing to their health and well being, and that the religion that they have relied upon, and that has guided them in their criminal enterprise, is upheld to their satisfaction and to the nth degree!

George Pal said...

The Mohammad coefficint may be only 20% but the UHI (uswa hasana (model of conduct) index) remains a constant100%.

Anonymous said...

Here is another case about 30 miles west of Rochdale, and is currently being prosecuted.

http://casualsunited.wordpress.com/2012/02/22/another-rape-gang-in-brierfield/

This one has a Mohammed coefficient of 50% - 3 out of the 6 rapists were called Mohammed.

These abusive gangs have been getting away scot-free for at least a decade. It was in 2003 that the Labour MP Ann Cryer went public about cases about 30 miles east of Rochdale. There are cases now from Blackburn to Birmingham, and from Liverpool to Leeds.

If I was a Somali muslim or a Bangladeshi muslim, I'd be wanting to distance myself from the Pakistanis who are in their greatest concentration in England in the north.

Anonymous said...

I rather think that the Muslim men should be tried in one of their many English Sharia Courts as adulterers or fornicators. What would be the punishment in the West of Muslim men who would be subject to lashing, hanging, or stoning in their home countries?

Ah well, the Muslim men would walk away as we know because the Sharia Court would rule the Muslim men 'innocent' with it being their divine right - neigh mandate - under Sharia Law to violently conquer and enslave local non-Muslim women and children as war booty and sexual concubines.

A Sharia Law outcome would be tremendously instructive for an apathetic English population insistent on keeping its eyes tightly closed to the EVIL of Islam and Sharia Law.

And, Sharia Law WILL conquer the traditional English court system as more and more English juries and judges are Muslims deciding the guilt and innocence of their fellow Muslims based on Sharia Law.

The indigenous English can look to the fate of the Egyptian Copts for a taste of their own future as non-Muslims living, suffering, and dying under Sharia Law.

Egghead

Anonymous said...

It has to be more than political correctness for covering it all up for so long. Perhaps it's because there are too many "high ranking" paedo men involved in this disgusting business ie, police( at the highest level),MPs, Lords etc etc OR is it because our financial system relies heavily on the SHARIA banks and this is why we have to pander to the Muslims!

Qualis Rex said...

As I've said before; if you don't care for English, don't worry-- they won't be around in another 100 years. Since they English have waged their PC war on Christianity, as a people they are now devoid of real values or human dignity, in favor of "anything goes...unless you are Christian". Mohammedans are simply filling the moral (hah!) vaccuum.

Anonymous said...

It's the oil.

England has no oil.

So, England submits to the Barbarians to keep the lights on - for the Barbarians!

Egghead

Qualis Rex said...

Anon, England has oil; ever heard of BP? They are only the 4th largest company in the world. Most of the oil they tap comes from US soil, so they don't need any reserves on British soil to supply the island. It's not about oil.

I personally believe it is about a guilty conscience and a social power-grab that happened in the 60's across Europe, headed by socialists.

Anonymous said...

I am a proud British Pakistani Muslim, if these men are guilty they should be handed to the Muslim community to be publicly be executed either by having their heads chopped of or stoning to death.
This is not a true reflection up the rest of us.
Also there seems to be more to this case as, it is impossible to clap with one hand. There are always to sides to a story.

Nemesis said...

Anonymous 9:23. You state there are always two sides to a story, yes, I would agree with that, however, this is not a story that requires two sides to protest their innocence,. This is a criminal enterprise that has been organized by adult Pakistani Muslim males to take advantage of young naive white females under the age of 15 to cater for their Islamic view of what they may do under Islamic Law to the infidel. The only thing that needs to be measured with this sordid enterprise is how many years jail the perps will recieve!

There is also a racist element involved in this criminal enterprise when Pakistani men pick white females as their victims, why have they not also included young Pakistani Muslim females? But, I would guess that you already know the answer to that one!

And I would put this to you; how would you recieve a number of white Christian males that did exactly what these criminal Pakistani's have done only to Pakistani Muslim females instead of white girls?

And I would bet that you do have the answer to that question.

laine said...

Despite Anonymous' claim that Muslims would mete out severe punishment to the rapists of underage girls, there's no evidence of that likelihood. However, there are numerous cases that demonstrate the usual Muslim judgment is to condemn the female victim to barbaric punishment such as lashing or community shaming or being forced to marry her attacker to restore her family's "honor" whereas the male perpetrators receive more mild punishment or none at all. One could say with Mohammed's example of marrying a child bride being followed in many present day Islamic countries that sexual assault of unwilling pre-pubescent girls is a feature of Islam instead of being proscribed and punishable. Where are the massive protests by Anonymous's otherwise very excitable co-religionists against this gang of predators and numerous others like it, chiding them publicly for giving Muslims a black eye? Crickets. As Fjordman informed us, the Norwegian rape rate has also multiplied steeply, with Muslim perpetrators and native women victims. Muslim men tried for such crimes have actually attempted the defense (a Pakistani Muslim in Australia recently) that sexual assault of an uncovered female was not illegal in their home culture so they thought they could do the same wherever they immigrated. Now there's one custom western immigration officials didn't think to specify in their introductory manuals "Do not rape a woman who's not veiled".

Anonymous said...

Muhammad Coefficient is 30%, Hamid is a form of Muhammad as it is based on the same H-M-D root.

Anonymous said...

"This is not a true reflection up [sic] the rest of us."

Right, because the rest of you are WORSE!

Right, because DEVOUT Muslim men 'marry' six year old Muslim girls in imitation of a Satanic prophet Mohammed instead of raping teenage white girls....

Right, because DEVOUT Muslim men kidnap Christian girls in Muslim majority lands away from their families, rape them, and then 'marry' them against their will.

Right, because DEVOUT Muslim men in Israel seduce young teenage Jewish girls and 'marry' them without their Jewish parents' knowledge or permission and prevent the young girls from returning home when the girls realize their tragic mistake.

Right, because DEVOUT Muslim men 'marry' up to four Muslim wives and take unlimited non-Muslim sex slaves as war booty.

Yes, we KNOW all about Muslim men and your 'side' of the story....

Egghead