Saturday, January 12, 2008

A Declaration of War Against the People of Europe

This is the big year for the European Union.

It’s the runup to the implementation of the Treaty of Lisbon, which will codify the permanent dictatorship of the Brussels bureaucracy over what is to become Eurabia. An accompanying propaganda blitz from the governments of Europe and their related quangos is attempting to soften up the subject populations of the European “provinces” and grease the skids for their acceptance of the new regime.

As Bat Ye’or said in her speech to Counterjihad Brussels 2007 (pdf format):

…the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union chose for the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue (2008) the themes of racism, xenophobia, asylum, immigration and multiculturalism. A multiplicity of programs on intercultural dialogue in numerous sectors was planed to combat exclusion, racism and xenophobia.

A constellation of these groups known as “The Alliance of Civilizations” is about to have its first forum in Madrid on January 15th.

This morning Exile directed my attention to the FIOE, the Federation of Islamic Organizations in Europe, which is undoubtedly a proud member of the alliance. Read the inclusive and tolerant boilerplate on their “About” page, and you’ll see how multiculturalism, bureaucratese, and Islam are all being stirred together into one big sleep-inducing soup.

FIOE logoFIOE’s slick website with its logo of the big hand holding onto the little hand conveys the a subliminal message: “Don’t worry about us! We’re just like you, only we wear funny clothes and pray five times a day!”

Yes, the mandarins of the EU would like you to believe that the Muslim immigrants and future overlords of Europe are just like you and me, regular people, ordinary citizens of the new stateless continent of Europe.

But they’re not. For a more nuanced and inclusive view of Islam in Europe, see the following article, which was posted yesterday at Snaphanen. Kepiblanc has kindly translated it from the Danish for Gates of Vienna.

A Declaration of War Against the People of Europe
by Kirsten Sarauw, theologian

01/11/2008 in Kristeligt Dagblad [Christian Daily]

Kirsten Sarauw Last year in Vienna a conference was held about so-called Euroislam (pdf, German). Here the prominent Muslim delegates formulated a common strategic vision about a Europe dominated by Islam. At the event Mustafa Ceric, Grand Mufti of Bosnia, envisioned an “upcoming Islamic era which, modeled on Moorish Spain and Osmannic Southern Europe, will take over after Christendom”.

Among those present was the ubiquitous professor Tariq Ramadan. He advised that the more long-sighted intentions of Euroislam should remain hidden from the general public.

The conference was in agreement about the first and foremost goal, namely the introduction of religious Islamic jurisprudence (sharia) in Europe “in the beginning at least as a parallel system alongside national laws in European states”. As to the real meaning of sharia they all agreed to avoid publicity as far as possible.

One might wonder why the declarations from that conference did not attract wider attention than they actually did. Could it be that such forecasts for Islam are so far-fetched that nobody takes them seriously? Or could it be that forecasts such as this about Euroislam are so deviant from the wishful thinking of the otherwise so self-asserting cultural elites in Europe that they prefer to ignore what was really said?

Tariq RamadanThe same could be said about the problematic professor Tariq Ramadan who proclaimed the most worrying statement: The real intentions of Euroislam must be concealed from the general public. Quite a harsh and frank statement, considering that he must anticipate being quoted in the media. But maybe he just cynically relies on the negligence of “the infidels”?

Although much embarrassing criticism has been published about Tariq Ramadan and his version of Euroislam, it hasn’t done much harm to his reputation as a modern and moderate European Muslim who sincerely wants to work for the peaceful integration of Muslims into Western societies. Tariq Ramadan continues to be a frequent and acknowledged guest at official conferences all over Europe, not least in the Nordic countries, where he lately has been used as an expert on countering the radicalization of Muslim youths, among other things. He is held in high esteem among young educated Danish Muslims.
- - - - - - - - -
Especially interesting in this respect is the influence of Tariq Ramadan within organizations such as “Critical Muslims” headed by Sherin Khankan and “Muslims in Dialogue” with high-profile Muslims like Mona Sheikh, Asmaa Abdol-Hamid and Abdul Wahid Pedersen.

Essentially Islam forbids Muslims to live in the lands of the infidels. The one and only valid exception to this is their public devotion to Allah and the prophet. In other words: mission, first and foremost Islamic confession, and visibility everywhere in society. Furthermore Tariq Ramadan suggests that the term “House of War”, the term traditionally assigned to regions of infidel influence, should be replaced by “House of Confession”, the better to describe that it’s more a question of mission rather than real war.

In this respect Tariq Ramadan differs a bit from militant Islam, at least in method, although not in the final outcome; both are all about Islamic dominance. Tariq Ramadan opposes the Muslim’s use of violence in Europe because in the long run violence might be devastating to the prospect of Euroislam. But Tariq Ramadan’s statements about Islamic violence are ambiguous, to say the least.

Yussuf QaradawiQaradawi is one of the most influential Sunni-Muslim scholars in the Middle East and with a longstanding affiliation with the radical Islamic movement The Islamic Brotherhood, founded 1928 in Egypt by Tariq Ramadan’s grandfather, Hassan al-Banna. Besides that he is a prominent member of the European Council for Fatwa and Science, which aspires to be the authoritative judicial board for European Muslims. Qaradawi has claimed that the final goal of Islam is the dominance over Europe as well as America, achieved through mission, propaganda and influential lobby groups.

Qaradawi probably set his heavy fingerprint on a document called “The Project” presumably authored by Said Ramadan, Tariq Ramadan’s father, he too a central figure in The Brotherhood. “The Project” , dated 1982, outlines a long-term strategy (100 years), a detailed roadmap for Islamic infiltration and the final grab of power in Europe (and the USA), and accordingly is in compliance with the declarations from the conference in Vienna last spring.

The paper was discovered (November 2001) while ransacking a luxury villa in Switzerland owned by Yossef Nada, an old friend of the Ramadan family, an international leader of the Muslim Brotherhood and the financial director of the Al-Taqwa Bank, Lugano, which is believed to fund Islamic terrorism such as Al-Qaeda and Hamas.

According to Tariq Ramadan it is precisely this missionary endeavor which will enable the Muslims of Europe to regain their self-confidence, dignity and feeling of having a purpose in life, so regrettably absent for many young Muslims. Muslims must abandon their defensive positions and take part in public life as active citizens and let their Muslim voices be heard everywhere in national democracies in their fight for greater “justice”. It should be underscored, that by “justice” Tariq Ramadan invariably means “Islamic Justice”, in other words sharia, which is a divine judicial order of religion as well as social life. This kind of active participation is one of The Project’s very central strategies of infiltration.

Tariq Ramadan’s call for active citizenship, confession (mission) and political struggle for greater “Muslim Justice” has had tremendous impact on many young Danish Muslims who increasingly like to flash their religious affiliation in public.

Asmaa Abdol-HamidWhen Asmaa Abdol-Hamid insists on wearing a headscarf in parliament it is just a test for political Islam on how far sharia can go. For radical Islam the headscarf is the symbol of sharia acceptance in its entirety, and it spreads out wherever the ideology of The Muslim Brotherhood gains ground. To control the women is a fundamental tenet of political Islam. It’s interesting to notice an article in The Project’s roadmap regarding the European left wing which must be exploited as a temporary stepping-stone and provisional ally in the struggle towards the final Islamization of the West. Concealment and denial of the final objective is specifically mentioned in this manual.

Bassam TibiThe original idea of Euroislam, invented by Bassam Tibi (former professor in Goettingen, Germany) stated that Islam in Europe should join the European democratic and cultural tradition and thus be forced into the necessary showdown with sharia as a political system. Tariq Ramadan and the Islamofascist brotherhood adopted that idea, but turned it upside down; now Euroislam is the vision of Islam’s religious and political dominance over Europe.

Wild fantasy? Maybe, but it’s not the first time a resolute fantasy has taken Europe by surprise. The new factor is that this vision of an Islamic takeover is now founded on a deluge in immigration unprecedented in the history of mankind, in numbers as well as in speed. In reality the conference in Vienna last spring is a Muslim declaration of war on the indigenous people of Europe. When will the responsible intellectuals and politicians of Europe see the writing on the wall? The doom of Europe might yet be prevented.

Hat tip for the Snaphanen post: LN. The photo of Kirsten Sarauw is © Steen.



Eleven years ago!
- - - - -
1997 on the 12th of February the then Swedish Foreign Minister LENA HJELM-WALLÉN (socialist) declared in the Swedish Parliament:
"The project "Euroislam" continues. It is a peace project that in the long term gives a possibility for Sweden and Europe to develop their relationships to our muslim neighbouring countries. Concurrent it contributes to a deepened understanding for the many people in Sweden and Europe that has a muslim background."
- - - - -
"Peace project", she said, not herself realizing that it actually is a "War projekt".

AngleofRepose said...

Geez. "sleep-inducing soup" is right, until you get to this part:

Upholding the rights of Muslim women within the European society.


Might wanna work on that in your own home countries first, bub!

You know what has to be one of their greatest worries to these insidious plans? The internet..

Thanks Al!

Holger said...

Over my dead body! ...As long as there is gas available and glassbottles to fill it up in, I will not surrender to these imperialists! ENOUGH!
...I'm sure MANY feel the same way but are holding back, and then when someone eventually crosses the line and lights the match to physical resistance the effect will be explosive. Dammed up feelings of resentment will pour out and there will be chaos in the streets of Europe. Right now I think many, many frustrated individuals are standing and looking for someone else to make the first move. No one wants to be the first one or to go about it alone... That's the only thing maintaining the calm. But everyday it is ticking closer and closer to a furious showdown, and the Islamofascists should be aware that things are heating up.

Charlemagne said...

"Tariq Ramadan opposes the Muslim’s use of violence in Europe because in the long run violence might be devastating to the prospect of Euroislam."

I said some time ago that the only way to prevent mass bloodshed, expose Islam's plan for Europe, and shake more Europeans from their slumber is to provoke them into violent reactions all across Europe. To do this will require that key Muslim leaders in all EU nations under threat be removed with extreme prejudice. Time is not on our side, it is clearly on the side of the enemy and they grow stronger with each passing day.

Charlemagne said...

Forgot to say regarding my last comment that even Tariq Ramadan recognizes that Muslim violence would be a blow to Islamization. Seems like validation of my provocation scenario.

El said...

'As long as there is gas available and glassbottles to fill it up in, I will not surrender to these imperialist!'

ha ha! best line of the week! let's hope we can do better than molotov cocktails, though...

booboo said...

Is the idea of armed resistence wishful thinking?

I fear so.

jihadis are creating communication networks, training camps, the idea of tolerance (even of ideas--e.g., sharia law for those who want it) of ideas that eat at the core of our civilization---and no one does a thing.

songdongnigh said...

Islam's infiltration of the West is like a python coiling about it's prey. Every time the prey exhales (gives up a little bit) the python squeezes a little more. Pretty soon, the victim disappears down the python's gullet.

livfreerdie said...

As GoV has pointed out, and others, there are jamaat al whatever compounds across the USA. Never looked at possible strategic locations but they would be able to launch attacks or provide safe houses for those that did attack. Just hope the local LE guys don't shoot me if I show up to defend our country.

The biggest problems for a pitchforks and torches response would a leader and organization which would show up on the surveillance authorities radar.


Zenster said...

Holger: As long as there is gas available and glassbottles to fill it up in, I will not surrender to these imperialists! ENOUGH!

WORD, Holger. Right now, I cannot give better support than than to refuse any condemnation of your position.

SongDongNigh: Islam's infiltration of the West is like a python coiling about it's prey. Every time the prey exhales (gives up a little bit) the python squeezes a little more. Pretty soon, the victim disappears down the python's gullet.

Right and wrong.

A python constricts its prey until the victim suffocates to death. Only after its prey has expired does a constrictor finally consume the corpse. To our last dieing breath, all of us must resist being engulfed by the Islamic serpent.

. said...

Once again, the response of the Counter-Jihad alliance should not be the destruction of the EU. The goal of the alliance should be an actual strengthening of the EU, and its makeover into an organization that values Europe and Europeans above those from other regions and nations. And that will occur by taking power in the various nations of Europe, or at least influencing those currently in power.

There is one fate for Europe worse than that of the Eurabia nightmarish dystopia foreseen by those in the Counter-Jihad alliance. That fate is one where the EU is dismantled, and the strong nation-states of Europe lead the continent into ruinous warfare, both actual and economic, that almost destroyed the continent in the mid-20th century.

Charlemagne said...

Gordon I disagree. Here in the US it is the assumption of State's powers by the Federal government has led to the advancement of Leftist/socialist/neo-Marxist policies. With centralized power it is much easier to keep the masses uninformed and much harder for the voices of individual citizens to be heard. Power must be devolved to the lowest level possible for the function, e.g. defense at the federal level, education at the local level. The federalization of education for example has done nothing but lead to the publicly funded politically correct morass we now find our education system. What has Brussels done for Europe other than attempt to implement freedom suppressing hate speech laws?
Why would European nations engage in warfare if they weren't in the EU? I don't believe that would happen.

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Baron Bodissey said...

Western Goals --

We have a comment policy here at GoV. Comments must be:

1. Civil,
2. Temperate,
3. On-topic, and
4. Stay within normal decorum.

Temperate means "No exhortations to commit violence or foment insurrection, etc." If you feel compelled to discuss such topics here, you must use indirection and discretion so as to stay within these guidelines.

To learn more about our comment guidelines, see this post.

I attempt to err on the permissive side with commenters, but there are limits.