Saturday, July 23, 2011

Gates of Vienna News Feed 7/23/2011

Gates of Vienna News Feed 7/23/2011There’s not much in tonight’s news feed, but do pay attention to Europol’s planned task force, which is being designed by “experts” to deal with non-Islamic terrorism in Norway.

Rahm Emmanuel isn’t the only one who believes in never letting a crisis go to waste. The Europeans have definitely caught on.

To see the headlines and the articles, open the full news post.

Thanks to C. Cantoni, McR, Steen, Van Grungy, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Commenters are advised to leave their comments at this post (rather than with the news articles) so that they are more easily accessible.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

2 comments:

Bo Malmberg said...

Fjordman denies that he has advocated violence. But this is what he wrote in Fjordman Report on May 3, 2010:

In many cases you can compromise, but in others you cannot. If somebody tries to poison you then you have to resist. It doesn’t matter in the long run whether those who do this do so because they deliberately want to kill you or because they are fools who accidentally kill you while intending to do something noble. The bottom line is: You die. You cannot be slightly dead, just like you cannot be slightly pregnant. If the Leftists and the Globalists have their way then our civilization will die, plain and simple. That’s why this ongoing struggle is likely to get ugly, because no compromise is possible. Since similar ideological struggles are taking place throughout the Western world, this situation could trigger a pan-Western Civil War.

Here Fjordman, clearly, is advocating civil war, and he specifically point out leftist and globalists as the target. My question is why he backs down when finally someone acts on the ideas Fjordman has put forward?

X said...

No he's not. He's describing a potential outcome. Nowhere does he say "we must start that war" or anything like it.