Friday, May 25, 2007

Sharia-Supporters and Transvestites of the World Unite!

The Fjordman Report

The noted blogger Fjordman is filing this report via Gates of Vienna.
For a complete Fjordman blogography, see The Fjordman Files. There is also a multi-index listing here.

[This post appears without the usual fine illustrations the Baron includes in Fjordman's posts. Since he is away, I don't have access to Command Central -- thus no images this time. --D]

I was planning to take a break from writing about Sweden, but I just couldn’t help it. Swedish journalist Kurt Lundgren had a noteworthy story on his blog this week. A friend told him about a magazine published by Lärarförbundet, the Swedish Teachers’ Union, the largest union for teachers and heads of schools in the country. The magazine, aimed at preschool teachers who take care of children between the ages of 0-6 years old, included recommendations to not only promote “gender equality” but also “sexual equality” at this tender age. Mr. Lundgren considers the suggestions that are sent out to kindergarten and preschool staff to be clear-cut sexual abuse of children:

“A three-year-old doesn’t have to learn queer theory, a four-year-old shouldn’t have to be force-fed lectures on gay sex by some sex freak from the Teachers’ Union. Children are supposed to play and discover their roles entirely on their own. Children are defenseless and shouldn’t be exposed to indoctrination, neither regarding sex nor politics.. (…) One wonders whether parents are aware of the abuses against preschool children that that Teachers’ Union’s magazine Pedagogiska magasinet is encouraging.”

In a kindergarten in Stockholm, the parents were encouraged by the preschool teachers - apparently ideological pioneers - to equip their sons with dresses and female first names. There are now weeks in some places when boys HAVE TO wear a dress. Lundgren considers this sexual indoctrination as worse than the political: “The political nonsense is seeking to alter opinions - the sex freaks seek to alter the children’s personality, their mentality and their entire constitution.”

After posting this, Lundgren soon received a threatening email: “I have been in touch with the Teachers’ Union. They are considering reporting you to the police for what you wrote about queer and gay sex as abuse of children.”

Lundgren wrote in reply: “To give sex education to preschool children, to force them to have an opinion on gay sex and queer (lesbians, transsexuals, bisexuality, fetishism, cross over, sex change etc.) I regard as abuse of children. (…) Little children, we are talking about three to six-year-olds here, cannot in the preschool protect themselves from these sexual assaults. Their parents are not there, the children are totally left to themselves. (…) Little children need to be left alone, they are supposed to play without adult supervision.”

Some comments left by his blog readers:

“There won’t be a police report about this. The Socialist Teachers’ Union will probably think twice before doing so. There could be a backlash if the media start writing about queer [theory] directed against children and the parents will open their eyes to what’s going on with their loved ones.”

“My 11-months-old son will never be allowed to go to a kindergarten. I and my cohabitant reserve the right to raise our son into a thinking, rational and independent individual. He will definitely be allowed to wear a Superman costume, play with cars and build wooden houses if he wants to. I will never force him to wear a princess costume against his will. Presumably it won’t be long before parents like us will have our children taken away from us, to be raised in accordance with sound, Socialist doctrines.”

“My 13-year-old son had ‘equality day’ [in school] and had to listen to a transvestite. I have myself never encountered or talked to one during my considerably longer life. Why is this important? Today’s children know nothing about the crimes of Communism, but everything about the sexual orientation of transvestites.”

This last comment is quite literally true. A poll carried out on behalf of the Organization for Information on Communism found that 90 percent of Swedes between the ages of 15 and 20 had never heard of the Gulag, although 95 percent knew of Auschwitz. “Unfortunately we were not at all surprised by the findings,” Ander Hjemdahl, the founder of UOK, told website The Local. In the nationwide poll, 43 percent believed that Communist regimes had claimed less than one million lives. The actual figure is estimated at 100 million. 40 percent believed that Communism had contributed to increased prosperity in the world. Mr. Hjemdahl states several reasons for this massive ignorance, among them that “a large majority of Swedish journalists are left-wingers, many of them quite far left.”

Meanwhile, Antifascistisk Aktion in Sweden, a group that supposedly fights against “racists,” openly brag about numerous physical attacks against persons with their full name and address published on their website. According to AFA, this is done in order to fight against global capitalism and for a classless society. They subscribe to an ideology that killed one hundred million people during a few generations, and they are the good guys. Those who object to being turned into a minority in their own country through mass immigration are the bad guys.

British historian Roland Huntford wrote a book in the early 1970s about Sweden called The New Totalitarians. Huntford notes how equality between the sexes was aggressively promoted from the late 1960s and early 1970s:

“When sexual equality was promulgated, and it was decided that a woman’s place was not at home but out at work, there was a rapid change in the language. The customary Swedish for housewife is husmor, which is honourable; it was replaced by the neologism hemmafru, literally ‘the-wife-who-stays-at-home’, which is derogatory. Within a few months, the mass media were able to kill the old and substitute the new term. By the end of 1969, it was almost impossible in everyday conversation to mention the state of housewife without appearing to condemn or to sneer. Swedish had been changed under the eyes and ears of the Swedes. Husmor had been discredited; the only way out was to use hemmafru ironically. Connected with this semantic shift, there was a change in feeling. Women who, a year or so before, had been satisfied, and possibly proud, to stay at home, began to feel the pressure to go out to work. The substitution of one word for the other had been accompanied by insistent propaganda in the mass media, so that it was as if a resolute conditioning campaign had been carried out. Very few were able to recognize the indoctrination in the linguistic manipulation; in the real sense of the word, the population had been brain-washed.”

This was closely linked to a campaign for sexual liberation:

“Indeed, the word ‘freedom’ in Swedish has come to mean almost exclusively sexual freedom, product perhaps of an unadmitted realization that it is absent, or unwanted, elsewhere. Through sex instruction at school for the young, and incessant propaganda in the mass media for the older generations, most of Sweden has been taught to believe that freedom has been achieved through sex. Because he is sexually emancipated, the Swede believes that he is a free man, and judges liberty entirely in sexual terms. (…) The Swedish government has taken what it is pleased to call ‘the sexual revolution’ under its wing. Children are impressed at school that sexual emancipation is their birthright, and this is done in such a way as to suggest that the State is offering them their liberty from old-fashioned restrictions.”

By old-fashioned restrictions, read Christianity and Christian morality. Huntford notes that this came together with efforts to downplay or attack Western culture prior to the French Revolution. According to Mr. Olof Palme, who was Swedish Socialist Prime Minister until 1986: “The Renaissance So-called? Western culture? What does it mean to us?”

“The State,” in the words of Ingvar Carlsson, then Minister of Education, “is concerned with morality from a desire to change society.” Mr. Carlsson, who was Swedish Prime Minister as late as 1996, has also stated that “School is the spearhead of Socialism” and that it “teaches people to respect the consensus, and not to sabotage it.”

“We have no ethical standards in education, and no rules for sexual behaviour,” in the words of Dr Gösta Rodhe, the then head of the department of sexual education in the Directorate of Schools, and thus in some ways the executive officer of government sexual policy. “You see, since there’s a lack of tension in Swedish politics, younger people have got to find release and excitement in sexual tension instead.”

This was in the early 1970s. Things have gotten worse in the two generations since then. Socialists and state authorities present this policy as liberation of women and sexual liberation. What it is actually about is breaking down rival sources of power: The traditional Judeo-Christian culture and the nuclear family. This leaves the state more powerful, since it can regulate all aspects of life and, most importantly, can indoctrinate the nation’s children as it sees fit, without undue parental influence. The state replaces your entire nuclear and extended family, raises your children and cares for your elderly.
- - - - - - - - - -
As writer Per Bylund observes: “A significant difference between my generation and the preceding one is that most of us were not raised by our parents at all. We were raised by the authorities in state daycare centers from the time of infancy; then pushed on to public schools, public high schools, and public universities; and later to employment in the public sector and more education via the powerful labor unions and their educational associations. The state is ever-present and is to many the only means of survival — and its welfare benefits the only possible way to gain independence.”

Socialist pioneer Alva Myrdal is the hero of the modern Swedish preschools. She wanted comprehensive education for special child carers who could provide children with competent guidance all day long. What the social engineers discovered later was that despite decades of state-sponsored gender equality propaganda, boys and girls still behaved differently. This disturbed them. Instead of concluding that maybe there are genuine, innate differences between the sexes, which sensible people would do, they decided to indoctrinate children more thoroughly, starting at an even earlier age, to eradicate gender differences.

Toy researcher Anders Nelson at Sweden’s Royal Institute of Technology has warned that toys have become increasingly gender-segregated over the past fifteen years: “People often explain [their toy purchases] by saying that boys and girls want different things. But in order for children to be able to reflect on [the toys] they receive, adults have to open their eyes to [inherent gender] structures. To children, these [gender] roles are more unquestioned and instinctual.” Mr. Nelson encouraged parents to give more gender neutral Christmas presents. In other words, no Barbie dolls for girls and no cars for boys.

The Swedish Consumers Association reacted angrily to a star-shaped,pink ice-cream because it represented gender-profiling. “Girlie, GB’s new ice pop, is pink and has make-up inside the stick. It says a lot about what GB thinks about girls and how they should be,” the association said in a statement. According to them, Sweden does not need more products that reinforce existing prejudices about sex roles, so they asked the producer to make the product less gender specific.

Again, this has thus absolutely nothing to do with “tolerance or diversity.” It’s done in order to break you down and to mold you into a new human being. Great emphasis is placed on destroying the Christian heritage of the native population. Pupils are taught that they have been liberated from the superstition and oppression of Christian nonsense. However, while Christianity has been ridiculed and demonized for generations, so much that some Swedish Christians complain about persecution, Islam is presented in textbooks as a benevolent and tolerant religion, and Islam is granted a high degree of respect in the public sphere.

A bus driver in the increasingly Muslim-dominated Swedish town of Malmö has been fired from his job following revelations that he stopped a woman from boarding his bus because she was wearing full Islamic face-covering, which made her hard to identify. In Sweden, it is thus unacceptable if girls are presented with pink ice-creams or Barbie dolls because this reinforces gender stereotypes, but the burka is just fine. Meanwhile, Sweden is in the midst of the most explosive rape wave in Scandinavian history, largely caused by immigration. While Swedish girls are called “whores” by Muslim immigrants, Swedish boys are told to wear a dress and study queer theory.

Sweden is supposedly the most “gender equal” country in the world. It’s also one of the nations most eagerly (at least officially, all other viewpoints are banned) embracing Multiculturalism. Promoting “sexual equality” alongside a rapidly growing Muslim minority is going to become an increasingly challenging balancing act. Sharia-supporters and transvestites of the world unite!


togo said...

Stunning story. It deserves the widest possible circulation.

Ron Van Wegen said...

I agree with "wily marmot". Frightening realities indeed. Well done.

Profitsbeard said...

As if kids don't have it hard enough without being used as sexualized brainwashing fodder for the pimps of any passing popular propaganda?

Let them determine their own personas.

At their own pace.

Girls are not boys.

Boys are not putty.

Nature is wiser than its children.

(Especially adult ones... who act worse than children.)

Ypp said...

What strikes me most is that Sweden neither was ruined by World wars, nor had a significant minority population. It is a perfect example of a purely white prosperouus country, which kills itself for no obvious reason. What's wrong with us, people?

Ypp said...

Teachers, librarians, academy, professional unions, socialists, feminists, transvestists, homosexuals - altogether counts to maybe 90% of population. It is not arrogant elites, it is a whole society. From this article, it seems that the reason is the belief that the man, if he wants to, can enforce the law, which is against nature or against God. Specifically, we want all people to be equal, period. Isn't it what we all believe in?

Anonymous said...

What's wrong with us [Sweden], people?

Between the 1840s and 1920s 1.3 million Swedes -- one-third of the Swedish people -- emigrated to the USA:

Imagine who left -- especially at that time when immigration was not simply a matter of less than one day's airplane journey followed by the loving care of some Nanny State. The Swedes who emigrated then had some guts and possibly a desire to live life they way they wanted.

Who got left behind? People who either were in a comfortable position in life and didn't want to leave it behind (leaders) -- and people who had no guts (sheeple who prefer to be led).

Selection, folks. That is a large part of why Sweden (and Norway -- and other European countries that had large emigrations) is the way it is today.

Great post, Fjordman, thanks. Absolutely ridiculous. I'm all for letting individuals live the way they want to live (as transvestites or whatever) -- but this is indoctrination, plain and simple. No other way of looking at it. Insane.

Unknown said...

" Selection, folks. That is a large part of why Sweden is the way it is today."

Bullshit! This 'queer/trans/fagot-philia' and 'gender-identity-hokum' seems to be an almost globally spread phenomenion -- from Boston to Calcutta.
- - - - - - - - - - - -

Police send four police officers to imvestigate 11-year-old primary school pupil George for a 'very serious' homophobic crime - he had called one of his schoolfriends 'gay'.

Something wrong here with the linking?

X said...

JCS, I'm glad you said that. I was trying to think of a way to say the same thing.

Between 1849 and 1920 sweden was a fairly libertarian parliamentary democracy, a constitutional monarchy. It was largely agrarian, and only had, I believe, one university.

Why did people leave? Two reasons. The first was, it was fuggin cold. The second was overpopulation. Despite is relatively huge size, most of Sweden is not good for growing food and at the time most of the population depended on the land. There wasn't enough land to go around to the point that, in some areas, people were subsisting on tiny scraps of land that were the end result of subdividing homesteads across the generations. Then there was a string of crop failures in the 1860s.

Basically people left because they wanted food and space. The people that stayed behind also wanted food and space, but they wanted to have that food and space in their own country. And they got it, because suddenly there was a surplus of land from all those emmigrants moving to the US...

But never mind all that, because we want to score cheap points against the 'euros'. After all, Ireland had an almost identical emigration pattern at around the same time and it's turned in to a quasi-socialist nearly-failed state too. Oh wait, no it hasn't.

Sweden is lead by socialist crazies but that isn't the result of 'selection'. I suspect that many of those 'sheeple' left with the emmigrants because everyone else was doing it, which implies that the reason for sweden's current behaviour lies elsewhere. It's the result of those socialist crazies taking advantage of national guilt in the aftermath of world war 2, coupled with other guilt about sweden's rather violent historic past. The Swedes used to have an empire that stretched to the far shores of the baltic. They were quite nasty to their neighbours. It's very easy to lay a slab of post-colonial guilt on their shoulders if you know where in their history to look. And if there's no direct historical events to make people feel guilty about you simply keep repeating the mantra that they're part of a wider culture of colonialism and racism. Eventually the constant repetition, coupled with a lack of information from other sources, will be enough to convince people to feel guilty without ever really understanding why.

Anonymous said...

"Ireland had an almost identical emigration pattern at around the same time and it's turned in to a quasi-socialist nearly-failed state too. Oh wait, no it hasn't."

Ireland's economy is currently based on providing low-cost workers for international corporations, and vast amounts of easy credit that's gone into creating one of the largest housing bubbles in the world.

Now that interest rates are rising the housing bubble is bursting, which will knock out much of the economy, and cheap labour from China, India and Eastern Europe is knocking the bottom out of the cheap Irish labour market. So, economically at least, it's very much heading into failed state territory.

As to the theory of emigration causing socialism, I can see some justification for it, but in Britain socialism seems to cause emigration, rather than the other way around.

X said...

It wasn't my theory. :)

Robohobo said...

Archonix said:

"After all, Ireland had an almost identical emigration pattern at around the same time and it's turned in to a quasi-socialist nearly-failed state too. Oh wait, no it hasn't.

I beg to differ, yes it is. The dole is big, big. Multiculturalism has struck there and hard. The Irish have become smugly intolerant of anyone who does not agree with them. Ireland was a neutral country from the founding of the Republic (The South). They fought in no wars, officially. They have a very small defense force. The think they are Swiss like. 'My people' are lost along with the rest of the EUropeons. Crime is rampant in Dublin. You cannot go into some of the immigrant neighborhoods safely. The situation there just does not get much notice. It is, after all, a very small island.

The Hobo

X said...

Well after the EU got its claws in that was pretty much inevitable...

R. Hartman said...

I think this directly links to the Frankfurt School... That movement appears to be far from dead.