Below are the official questions posed by Dutch MP Geert Wilders to the Prime Minister concerning the recent attack on him by the OIC.Many thanks to the PVV for sending this translation.
Wilders to Dutch Prime Minister: Distance yourself publicly from OIC statements
Written Parliamentary questions of Geert Wilders MP (PVV) to the Prime Minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs about the statements of the OIC on Dutch politicians and the intimidating statement of the OIC secretary-general about me:
| 1. | Have you seen the intimidating statement of the OIC Secretary General, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, about me and the OIC report “Fourth OIC observatory report on islamophobia” about statements made by various Dutch politicians? | |
| 2. | Do you agree that the OIC has vastly overstepped the boundaries with these intimidating statements and do you agree with me that a Dutch politician should have the right to criticise Islam and multiculturalism in a public debate, as was confirmed during my political trial by the court decision of June 23rd? |
| 3. | Are you prepared to explain to the OIC member countries that criticism of Islam and freedom of speech are essential in a democratic society under the rule of law? If not, why not? | |
| 4. | Do you share the opinion that criticism, such as that of an organization like the OIC, is hypocrite and despicable given that the OIC in article 24 of its own Cairo Declaration on Human Rights explicitly states that all rights and freedoms are subject to Islamic Shari’ah law? If not, why not? | |
| 5. | Are you prepared in the short term to distance yourself publicly in strong wordings of this report and of the intimidating statement of the OIC secretary general? If not, why not? | |
| 6. | Will you make it clear once and for all to the OIC that the Netherlands will not accept to be lectured by an institution such as the OIC which makes human rights subject to the barbaric Shari’ah, and that we will not allow our fundamental freedoms and our freedom of speech to be restricted? If not, why not? | |
| 7. | Are you prepared to answer these questions this week? |
16 comments:
Go Geert.
Much is happening in Europe and I detect, or hope I detect, a serious fight back finally.
Maybe GoV will soon need to rebrand as GoE (Gates of Europe). Maybe GoV or GoE will soon be unnecessary
@Bewick'
I think your hopes are well founded,this man is a genius!
6. Will you make it clear once and for all to the OIC that the Netherlands will not accept to be lectured by an institution such as the OIC which makes human rights subject to the barbaric Shari’ah, and that we will not allow our fundamental freedoms and our freedom of speech to be restricted? If not, why not? [emphasis added]
One small word with so much meaning. It is vital to recognize how Wilders slips in these signals to alert Western minds that Islam's Neanderthal mindset is not and will never be compatible with free and open societies.
Let Holland's Prime Minister come back and try to argue with Geert that shari'a is not "barbaric" and watch the fireworks begin. Thus does Geert consciously expand the reputation for inhumanity by which Islam is known.
This is no minor issue, especially not in Europe with its abominable restrictions upon Free Speech. Incrementally, Geert and others like him will gradually widen the denigrating vocabulary with which Europeans can legally describe Islam.
This is a war of attrition that seeks to match Islam's "protected" Hate Speech against Infidels until there is some sort of parity in the war of words. Do not underestimate just how important this propaganda war is. Muslims are past masters in this battle and people like Geert have put their very lives on the line to make sure that Europeans are given a growing toolbox of weapons with which to fight the Islamic enemy.
GO GEERT!
Geert is dragging the multiculturalists into reality.
Go Geert Go!
Bewick's right. Much is happening in Europe. There's quite a lot in Die Presse about 'Integration' in Austria. If someone with better German than mine and time for more than a cursory skim of the articles wanted to do a (partial) translation or report on them, I'm sure the Baron, Dymphna, the general readership and I would be grateful.
Western PC MCs (in sufficient numbers -- i.e., as a majority) will come around to the rational conclusion: condemn Islam and all Muslims who support Islam.
The question is only when; not whether. And we have the fanaticism of Muslims to thank for that; for, they will push it far enough to wake up Western PC MCs.
As to the when question, that's where pessimism comes in: it is reasonable to suppose that this will occur only after tragically unnecessary numbers of us (far more than we can enumerate to date) will be mass-murdered and maimed.
Hesperado: As to the when question, that's where pessimism comes in: it is reasonable to suppose that this will occur only after tragically unnecessary numbers of us (far more than we can enumerate to date) will be mass-murdered and maimed.
The "when question" is quite easy to answer. Think of it more as a "tipping point". As in the following equation:
THE TIPPING POINT WILL BE REACHED WHEN IT IS MORE TROUBLE TO LIVE WITH MUSLIMS THAN IT IS TO LIVE WITHOUT THEM.
It's that simple. Not so simple is the horrific butcher's bill required to permanently reprogram PCMC mentality.
Have you noticed that the OIC's website is strikingly similar to the UN? And that its emblem is also identical? Hopefully the majority can see through this Taqqiya and realise that the OIC is simply a front for world Islamic domination wolf, wearing UN clothing. But the "Islamophobia" conferences strike me as desperation. The best thing that can be done is to disband the UN altogether, and the OIC will lose its power at the same time. There is no more need of the UN - WW2 finished 70 years ago.
My god we have an article in the Daily mail now with the BBC admitting,i quote "BBC executives have also in the past conceded the corporation was guilty of promoting Left-wing views."I would post the whole thing,but am not sure if it is allowed? Whats going on??
Geert Wilders is not only a genius, but also a man of rare courage. I stand with him.
Zenster,
PC MCs have different tipping points than do rational people.
In addition, PC MCs are capable of amazing feats of denial, further strengthening their ability to resist the logic of the tipping point past the point of reason.
That's precisely the reason why there will be tragic loss of life before the tipping point is reached; because the current majority throughout the West is and will most likely remain PC MC during the decades ahead during which Muslims will continue to metastasize.
"There is no more need of the UN - WW2 finished 70 years ago."
The PC MC West is still fighting WW2 (particularly in Europe): that's why we can't begin to fight WW4.
(WW3 being the Cold War which PC MC has ruled a paranoid delusion by excessively Communist-phobic right-wingers: PC MC's persistent WW2 paradigm thus tended to undercut our victory in WW3: the same PC MC mentality that derides the seriousness of (or even vilifies those who took seriously) Anti-Communism during the Cold War, is the mentality that now derides the seriousness of the concern about Islam).
This WW2 paradigm remains, and is directly preventing us from, among other crucial things, seeing the danger of Muslims, because by that paradigm the New Hitler cannot possibly be an Ethnic People (which is how PC MCs think of Muslims) -- and to even begin to go down that slippery slope toward thinking such bad things about Muslims is to end up becoming "another Hitler".
Thus, the bitter irony and bizarre paradox: Our dominant and mainstream paradigm whose raison d'etre is to prevent a new Hitler is -- precisely by doing so in the way it does so -- positively enabling the next Hitler to rise up.
@Hesperado,
That'd make for a good blog post.
Thanks 1389; I might do that.
I'd like to second 1389's last comment.
Sag.
The UK needs a Geert Wilders, urgently.
Post a Comment