It’s always refreshing to hear a dedicated Muslim speak out so clearly and truthfully about his faith.
Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:
At the siege of Vienna in 1683 Islam seemed poised to overrun Christian Europe.
We are in a new phase of a very old war.
Friday, February 17, 2012
“Apostasy Deserves Capital Punishment in an Islamic State”
Haitham al-Haddad is a “British” Islamic scholar who sits on the Islamic Sharia Council in London. The video below is taken from a Dutch TV debate and an interview with Mr. al-Haddad.
It’s always refreshing to hear a dedicated Muslim speak out so clearly and truthfully about his faith.
Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:
It’s always refreshing to hear a dedicated Muslim speak out so clearly and truthfully about his faith.
Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:
4 comments:
Such Muslims are never "British" or "American" or "French" etc. merely live in and create mischief for those naive foolish western countries that gift them citizenship. They are only Muslim, with loyalty only to the Caliphate for which they are colonizing and proselytizing (especially in prisons). It bothers me no end to see these wilful foreigners referred to as my countrymen when they are nothing of the kind and their loyalties lie elsewhere.
While I consider this man to be an Islamic lunatic, I appreciate the fact that he is willing to display it publicly.
I defy him to produce one western woman that wants to be stoned for the sin of adultry, which according to Sharia, is in many cases actually rape.
Most people that I know haven't a clue about Sharia. It would be very helpful if we had more discussions like this broadcast to the general public.
I laughed out loud when the female on the panel was asked what she would do with a woman that wanted to be stoned. "I'd take her to a doctor!" Absolutely perfect response.
This is some of the sloppiest debating I have ever seen in my entire life. This Muslim fellow in this video has perfected the art of dodging questions. I also must say that these other people at the table are the worst people to debate this topic. Clearly, they have have no idea how to have a constructive debate. Why didn't they push the women's rights issue (If there are circumstances where women have more rights than men, are there circumstances where men have more rights than women?) or the problems surrounding democracy (I suppose Islam has never killed anybody right?).
So in Islam, women have the right to "get frustrated very quickly" and thus be dismissed without further comment. Wow.
Unfortunately the other panelists haven't the mental wattage to take on this fellow, notwithstanding his patent dishonesty. But he has no other cards to play than refusing to acknowledge his own positions and refusing to acknowledge the questions of others.
Post a Comment