Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Submission For Our Time

When Vlad Tepes listened to David Cameron’s speech in Turkey, he realized that the Prime Minister was speaking in a language that many people can’t understand. Vlad volunteered to translate the text into English, and as a result most readers will find Mr. Cameron’s words all too familiar:



[Post ends here]

10 comments:

Zenster said...

What is it that has rendered these Vampire Elite™ so utterly immune to any sense of irony or even just the outright preposterous?

Time Point 1:20:00 − They think the problem is Islam itself. And they think the values of Islam can just never be compatible with the values of other religions, societies or cultures.

Here, Cameron summarizes in a nutshell all that is evil about Islam even as, with equal alacrity, goes on to dismiss such views as being those of "the prejudiced".

As always, the irony is so thick that you can spread it on toast. To this day, Islam remains one of the most, IF NOT THE MOST, prejudiced of all ancient institutions that have survived into these modern times.

The penultimate obscenity is how these effete little sodding wankers seek to take such self-evident truths and pervert them into knouts with which to whip against the backs of all who steadfastly refuse to guzzle down their appeasement-flavored brand of Kool-Aid.

That they somehow manage to get away with it, without suffering dire physical consequences, goes entirely beyond the pale.

With all of this Multiculturalist fawning over Islam, Cameron et al continue to make what can be nothing less than constant declarations of war against the indigenous European peoples.

ole said...

Mr Cameron seems singlehandedly to be capable of prooving that a british conservative can be more stupid than any other species in the known universe. Interesting to know if there was a lot of cousin-to-cousin mariages in his family ? Maybee he has more in commen with muslims than we thought ?

EscapeVelocity said...

Those damn misunderstanders of Islam!

4Symbols said...

In hoc signo vinces


Melanie Phillips has a interesting article on Cameron's Betrayal of Britain - Weep for Britain: 1940 this is not

NorseAlchemist said...

Where's a Churchill when you need him?

We face a great conundrum here, not just in the UK, but all through this great conflict. Few are willing to step up and be leaders, and those that do quickly are struck down as racists or simply struck down. We no longer have the power in democratic governments to fully effect change, especially in light that America might be facing the most massive case of election rigging every to exist, should certain research be accurate.

What are we left to do, in the face of traitorous leaders and an overwhelming threat of Socialism and Islam? I don't think armed uprisings are an option, nor even a desirable tool. Maybe I'm wrong. But I don't see people rising up en-mass with weapons till the rapists are at the door and children are murdered in their beds. Even then, seeing as that is already happening, I'm not sure what will happen.

I do not accept this end to all things, but I am stumped as to how we shall prevent it.

Ultra said...

When I hear the modern Quisling this comes to mind:

2 Thessalonians 2:8-12 (King James Version)

8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:

9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,

10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Strong delusions indeed; coming straight from the same Cameron who bought all of the lying wonders of Obamination.

Henrik R Clausen said...

What are we left to do, in the face of traitorous leaders and an overwhelming threat of Socialism and Islam?

Solid defence of private property. Use 1st & 2nd Amendments as much as possible.

Anonymous said...

Also, doing away with democratic governments would be nice.

NorseAlchemist said...

I fail to see how that would help anything Rebelliousvanilla. While one might think that a monarchy or dictatorship would have the power needed to fight Islam, just looking at the positions of the royal families in Europe shows us that they support Islam. Those most likely to form a dictatorship at this point are the very people we want to stop. All that would happen is we would be in a worse position attempting to stop them.

Anonymous said...

Norse, obviously that having the current fools in government form a dictatorship would hardly be the solution. But the solution is hardly democratic either. Also, outright dictatorship isn't the solution either and no country in Europe still is a monarchy. Just having a person that calls themselves king isn't cutting it for that.