The term “child rapist” normally describes an adult who engages in sexual activity with a child. When the Religion of Peace is involved, however, the phrase can take on an entirely different meaning, which is what happened earlier this year in the Australian town of Bendigo.
We reported almost a year ago about a culturally-enriched gang rape case in the state of Victoria. Seven suspects, three of them juveniles, were accused of raping a woman. The Mohammed Coefficient for the adults was 50%, but could not be calculated for the youngsters, since they remained unidentified in the press.
These three child rapists have now been convicted. According to ABC News:
Three boys found guilty of raping woman
Three boys have been found guilty of raping a 21-year-old woman in Bendigo in central Victoria.
The boys aged 14, 16 and 17 were charged with counts of rape and assault over the attack in the woman’s Flora Hill home in January.
They faced a hearing in the Children’s Court last month and today a magistrate ruled they were guilty of several offences.
They will be sentenced in February.
Four men charged over the same incident are due to face court in April.
It took almost a year to convict these little lads for their misdeeds, and the adults won’t even go to court until April. Why in the world does the process take so long? Australia is beginning to approach American standards of “justice delayed”.
By the way, just in case you were picturing these “boys” as normal high-spirited teenagers whose youthful capers got a bit out of hand, think again. Consider this description from last January in The Age:
The 16-year-old applied for bail in a children’s court. It was denied after the magistrate heard he had played a leading role in the alleged rape.
Detective Senior Constable Christopher Reed, of the sexual crimes squad, said the teenager had referred to himself as “gangster” throughout the incident and was alleged to have digitally raped the woman while she screamed for him to stop.
These “boys” aren’t just participants in crimes, they are leaders, and consider themselves gangsters.
And they’re good Muslims, too. They know the rule about what they can do with “cat meat” — Sheikh Hilaly explained the matter quite clearly a few years back.
For a complete listing of previous enrichment news, see The Cultural Enrichment Archives.
Hat tip: Salome.
7 comments:
They should be treated no different than any other rapist and prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Religion or culture is never an excuse for this type of hateful crime.
And right on the heals of seeing this posted at GOV, I ran across this link:
Recent Charges of Sexual Abuse of Children in Hollywood Just Tip of Iceberg, Experts Say
Has nothing to do with Islamist gangsters, but rather a general reflection of decadent mankind in this so-called moder age of enlightened thinking.
As an Aussie ex-cop I am familiar with the Australian judicial system and while I have no further information regarding this case, I could offer a reason as to why it has taken so long for these 'cultural enrichers' to have their day in court.
My guess would be that their defence lawyer has been delaying proceedings, and there could be many reasons for this to occur - such as gathering character reports or other evidence which could be in their favor, such as any predilection, or antecedents of an abnormal sexual nature that the victim may have from her background. Any evidence of this nature would then be used to mitigate the Defendants actions.
Obviously, the police Brief of Evidence is of sufficient strength to have warranted a trial by Judge and Jury (District or Supreme Court) for the adult Defendants who were released on bail.
The juvenile offenders will probably be taken to a Juvenile Justice centre for a six month or longer stay. Magistrates in the Australian system operate at Local/Childrens Court, or as in Victoria's system, County Court, and are only able to hand down a maximum two years jail time for any offence that is not considered to warrant a higher court.
I hope this alleviates some of your concerns.
In Islam, if a woman is not married, she is "public property".
This is one of the issues where I believe that Islam triggers warfare. It sure as hell would be as rightful a war to fight as that against slavery.
Digital rape is a muslim thing. There have been numerous instances of this lately. That's what happened to the American and French female journalists who were assaulted in Cairo a few months apart. I also remember such an assault on a French beach some time ago.
*IF* I understand this correctly, the point of all of this is to "spoil" the woman so no (oxymoron-alert!) self-respecting musloid would have her.
When "regular rape" is not feasible or desirable, "digital" means can still render her a "non-virgin" and thus "ruin" her as previously described.
Dear Dedicated_Dad: To clarify, the theological point of Muslim rape is to prevent a virgin from entering heaven. However, Muslims neither presume nor believe that Western women are virgins.
Indeed, Muslims label free women as Western whores without a Muslim tribe to protect them - and thus fair game as jihad war booty.
The example of Mohammed instructs Muslims to conquer all infidels, murder the men, and enslave the women and children as sex slaves.
Muslim men are TOTALLY fine with raping non-Muslim women as either war booty OR war strategy. The gang rape of Western non-Muslim women is a purposeful strategy used to demoralize the infidel enemy to 1) admit the superior status of Muslims, and 2) submit to Sharia Law - which formally codifies Muslim supremacy into eternity....
Post a Comment