Why Is This Not Treason?
by Paul Weston
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague. — Cicero
On the 3rd of January 1946, William Joyce, better known as Lord Haw-Haw, was the last man in Britain to be hanged for the ancient crime of treason. Unless a future government changes the law it is unlikely that traitors will ever dangle again, after Tony Blair rather conveniently repealed the death penalty for such a crime in 1998.
That is not to say treason no longer exists. Now the full extent of Labour’s thirteen-year rule has become apparent, an increasing number of Britons are volubly accusing the Labour Party of wilfully and cold-bloodedly betraying Britain and deliberately jeopardising our children’s future.
Lord Haw-Haw of course sided with the Nazis during the hot war of 1939-1945. The recent Labour government might not have been operating in a hot-war theatre, but they certainly carried out a warm-war against the British (principally the English) via mass immigration from one of the most hostile and anti-Western countries in the world, Pakistan.
Consider some of the following statistics:
- Only nineteen percent of Pakistanis have a negative view of Al Qaeda and by default the Taliban, whilst seventy-five percent wish to see Sharia law implemented. British-born Muslims make an estimated four hundred thousand trips a year to Pakistan, where as many as thirty threats against Britain are being monitored at any given time.
- Thirty-three percent of Muslim students in Britain think killing in the name of Islam is permissible. Only thirty-seven percent oppose the introduction of Sharia law and only twenty-five percent oppose the creation of a worldwide Muslim caliphate.
- MI5 believe there are up to four thousand potential terrorists and thirteen thousand Al Qaeda sympathisers living in Britain. The CIA devotes an astonishing forty percent of their anti-terrorist homeland security operations against suspects not in Afghanistan or Waziristan, but in Britain itself — a country described by one CIA operative as “a swamp of Jihadis.”
- Barack Obama’s counter-terrorist advisor Bruce Riedel recently stated: “The British Pakistani community is recognised as probably Al Qaeda’s best mechanism for launching an attack against North America.”
All in all then, it would seem less than prudent to allow any more bearded ideologues into Britain, yet the Labour government — and this must sound quite insane to most people — actually went to the extraordinary lengths of advertising for foreign colonisers from the very same country the Home Office was paying Danegeld to in a typically limp-wristed appeal to stop it from blowing us up.
The British Embassy in Pakistan distributed glossy pamphlets entitled “Multicultural Britain — a Land of Immigrants” which gave a raft of arguments as to the benefits of living in Britain such as well paid jobs, plain old welfare, and the prospect of inviting over the entire extended family (sans goat) once a British passport had been acquired.
And of course there was the rather unpleasant — nay, treacherous — implication that there was no such thing as a homogenous Britain, no such place as an English homeland, just an indeterminate area of land settled by a vague mongrel collection of disparate peoples including any number of rag-tag colonial racists awaiting divine racial redemption from those they once oppressed.
So desperate were the Labour traitors to destroy Britain that, having secured power, they immediately carried out two political acts which could only place our peaceful future in doubt. The Human Rights Convention was immediately incorporated into British law and immigration rules were relaxed to allow an open-door policy of mass Muslim immigration.
A few thousand people who could gently assimilate were of little use to the Labour government. To ensure the success of their revolutionary plan, they urgently needed inassimilable millions and were quite prepared to deceive the British public about the real number of Muslim immigrants — and the real reasons Tony Blair wanted them in Britain.
And once the floodgates were opened, it became supremely important not to turn anybody away. Of the 2 million visas issued every year, fifteen percent of them were “processed” when they should not have been in order to hit “productivity targets,” with immigration officials placed under intense political pressure to issue visas rather than reject them.
One man who took advantage of Blair’s treachery was Abu Baseer, the spiritual advisor to Ansar ul-Islam, a jihadist organisation linked to Al Qaeda. Baseer was originally based in Iraq prior to settling in West London, from where he issues various fatwas calling for death to British soldiers and the overthrow of the West. He had this to say on the subject of immigration:
“One of the goals of immigration is the revival of the duty of jihad and enforcement of power over the infidels. Immigration and jihad go together. One is the consequence of the other and dependent upon it. The continuance of the one is dependent upon the continuance of the other.”
The next stage in Labour’s war against Britain and its indigenous people was to make sure the foreign colonisers maintained their 7th century ideology and customs through a curious yet highly effective liberal process called “multiculturalism.” This guaranteed their non-assimilation and thus provided Tony Blair and his friends with a hostile and ever-growing tool with which to incrementally erode traditional Britain.
Despite the obvious violence that emanates from massed Muslims wherever they are in the world, the Labour government went to great lengths to portray Islam as The Religion of Peace, even as Christianity was mocked and defiled, and decent, moral and patriotic Britons were re-cast and criminalised as Islamophobic, race-hating Nazis.
Not even our children were safe from Tony Blair’s thought police. The propaganda arms of the BBC and the state educational service tried to convince our children that their race, culture, religion and history consisted only of genocide, racism and evil. The spectre of Adolf Hitler was also constantly invoked with the quite deliberate intention of linking any resistance to the religious and ethnic colonisation of Britain with the actions and ideology of the Nazis.
And while third-world immigration continued apace, the Labour Party lied to cover up the attendant serial catastrophes. We were told that they were peaceful, that they committed little crime and that they were a benefit to the economy. None of this was true, as detailed by the exposure of Labours’ various lies and distortions, which showed a negative cost to the economy and a disproportionate level of crime including rape and murder — and of course, terrorism.
Nine out of ten new jobs were taken by immigrants, along with eighty-five percent of new housing. Muslims are grossly over-represented within Britain’s jails and within Britain’s welfare state, which supports fifty percent of Muslim males and seventy-five percent of females who reproduce like belt-fed mortars rather than going out to work.
To further bolster the Muslim demographics, Britain’s laws against polygamy were overlooked in the case of Islam. Muslim males could thus legally amass four imported wives, twenty to thirty children and a large house (or houses) in which to raise them, all paid for by the Labour state — right down to the satellite dish tuned into the various sources of jihad beamed direct from the East.
Only two out of three babies born in Britain today are classified as white British. Twenty percent of mothers are first generation immigrants, and a further twenty-five percent second or third generation immigrants. The idea that there are only 2.4 million Muslims in Britain is therefore ridiculous. There is strong evidence to suggest the numbers could be somewhere between 5-10 million.
The welfare-funded Muslim birth-rate has already rendered English children a minority in many city schools. In London, white school children now enter their first year as an ethnic minority. Figures from the Office of National Statistics suggest that British people of all ages will become a minority by 2066 with the young becoming a minority far earlier, and the young English earlier still.
These apocalyptic figures led Professor David Coleman of Oxford University to state that the transition of white Britons to a minority was likely to be: “unwelcome… and would represent an enormous change to national identity — cultural, political, economic and religious”.
Professor Coleman is quite right, but what is scarcely believable is that these enormous changes were precisely what the Labour Party had in mind in 1997. This was made apparent when Peter Hitchens recounted his dismay regarding a fellow hack who jumped ship in order to work for the Labour Party:
“I asked him why he had done this awful thing. He replied: you have no idea at all just how enormous the New Labour Project really is.”
Other people were all too aware of the size and direction of the Labour Party juggernaut, but still managed to hold onto their naiveté as to its ultimate destination, which appears to be the cultural and racial eradication of the English people. This genocidal policy was explained by Tony Blair’s speech-writer Andrew Neather in 2010, when he rather foolishly came out with the following treasonous nuggets:
‘It didn’t just happen: the deliberate policy of ministers from late 2000 until at least February last year was to open up the UK to mass migration… to make the UK truly multicultural…the policy was intended to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date… this shone through even in the published report: the “social outcomes” it talks about are solely those for immigrants’
There were two main reasons for such treachery. The first was held by Labour’s minority hard-left who wanted to destroy utterly the hated traditional establishment, and in this respect they had no choice but to declare war on their own people. To the hard-left, the enemy was the conservative, Christian, capitalist West of liberal-democracy Western civilisation — or, in other words, the majority of the English.
The second reason, held perhaps by the majority of Labour apparatchiks, was to ensure a socialist government in perpetuity via the imported foreign vote. Research into voting patterns conducted for The Electoral Commission in May 2005 showed that Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshis voted 56%, 50% and 41% for Labour. The equivalent figures for the Conservatives were 11%, 11% and 9%
The Labour Party has form with this kind of gerrymandering. Ex-Communist Peter Mandelson’s grandfather, Herbert Morrison, who was Labour’s Deputy Prime Minister between 1945-1951, came up with the novel idea of constructing soviet-style concrete tower-blocks for the working-class to live in who would subsequently vote Labour and thus “build the f*****g Tories (Conservatives) out of London.”
Tony Blair simply took it a stage further, and imported a “vigorously encouraged to feel oppressed class” from foreign climes to serve as cultural destroyers / Labour bloc-voters. This is a subtle re-working of Bertolt Brecht’s comment in the wake of East Berlin’s 1953 bread riots, when he suggested: “Wouldn’t it be simpler for the government to dissolve the people and elect another?”
Who would have thought this would one day apply to “democratic” Britain where the indigenous people are not so much being dissolved as replaced, and where “population replacement” is simply a more refined way of saying ethnic cleansing?
It was James Burnham who first coined the phrase “Suicide of the West”, but this is not a majority-ordained suicide. It is a minority-controlled murderous genocide. Let me be very clear about this: Tony Blair and the Labour Party declared war on their own people, and there is (as yet) no substantive reason to believe we can survive this century, let alone the long term.
The point of war is not about fighting and shooting and storming and gung-hoing; it is about gaining physical territory and taking political control of the defeated territory and its people. This is exactly what is slowly but surely happening to the English.
And because it is happening so slowly, many people are unaware of the situation. If a man is injected with a fast acting poison and dies minutes later, he has clearly been murdered. But is it not still murder if the poison were slow acting and allowed the man to live another twenty years?
It is the act of injection, knowing the consequences, which makes it murder, and Tony Blair injected Britain with a lethal cocktail of fast-breeding inassimilable aliens in the full and calculated knowledge that the country and its indigenous people would be incrementally destroyed as a result.
We can see this destruction today. Vulnerable girls in Northern towns were groomed and raped by Pakistanis for over eight years without any recrimination. The police simply pretended nothing untoward was happening. Much the same happened in Berlin in the mid 1930s to the Jews, who suffered tremendous persecution that was subsequently ignored by the authorities.
In London, entire areas are slowly coming under Islamic control. Tower Hamlets is now lost to the West as Jews, women and homosexuals are persecuted whilst English street names and the few remaining whites are systematically replaced. Soon to be lost, if indeed they are not already lost are Luton, Bradford, Oldham, Birmingham, Leicester, etc. Fjordman calls this Beheading Nations and asks the following question:
“Less attention has been paid to the fact that Muslims are beheading entire nation states. Although this is happening in slow motion, it is no less dramatic. Historically, the major cities have constituted a country’s ‘head’ the seat of most of its political institutions and the largest concentration of its cultural brainpower. What happens when this “head” is cut off from the rest of the body?”
When our racial / religious society cedes territory to a rival society, then we are losing a battle. When the state enacts laws to reward the aggressive incomer and to penalise the passive native, then we are losing a battle. When our children are brainwashed into the belief that they are evil and worthy only of displacement, then we are losing a battle. When our women and children are raped and abused whilst the state remains silent, then we are losing a battle.
And when finally we become too defeated even to breed whilst we pay the aggressor to demographically swamp us, then we have not just lost a battle, we are in the midst of losing a war, our homeland, and our civilisation. We are rapidly on our way to extinction.
We have been betrayed. Tony Blair and the Labour Party have committed treason. The British people were never asked if they wished Muslim immigrants to colonise Britain in such large numbers that it constituted invasion. Had they been asked they would have replied with a resounding No!
Although lawyers may argue over the precise meaning of the word “treason”, everyone else understands it only too well, including Tony Blair, which (along with the EU sell-out) is presumably why he repealed the treason laws. The Labour government was elected to represent the best interests of the British people, not those of Mirpur.
It does not really matter whether the third world was imported for revolutionary or electoral gain. All that matters is that Tony Blair’s Labour Party systematically allied itself with the massed imported ideologues of the Western world’s most persistent historical aggressor, and actively sided against Britain and the British people.
Rather than sign off with a furious tirade about the severe recrimination traitors should endure, I will leave you instead with a calm yet deeply poignant quote from Alex Henshaw, chief test-pilot for Vickers Armstrong during the Second World War. Despite test-flying ten percent of all Spitfires during their development stage, Mr Henshaw survived the war and lived a long life before dying in 2007:
“I feel extreme emotional sadness for the young men I knew that gave their lives willingly for a cause in which we all believed. And I often say to myself now if those young boys would come down now and walk through the villages, through the towns and through the cities and look around and see what is happening to us, they would say somewhere along the line we have been betrayed.”
Yes, Mr Henshaw. I am afraid you have.
Previous posts by Paul Weston: