Thursday, May 26, 2011

The Religion of Rape

Cultural Enrichment News

We reported last year on the fact that culture-enrichers seem to have a monopoly on rape in Oslo. The latest figures have come in, and the situation hasn’t changed — for the past five years, in every single case in which the perpetrator could be identified, the rapist was of non-Western origin.

Let’s be honest: that means they were Muslims. The vast majority of non-Western immigrants in Oslo are Muslim, and I’d bet money that none of those rapists were Hindus, Buddhists, Baal-worshippers, etc. The victim interviewed in the news story below reports that her attacker told her that his religion allowed him to do what he did. Do you think he was a Mormon?

What’s more, virtually all the victims were women and girls “of Norwegian background.”

This trend is not centrally planned, organized, and directed, but it is systematic nonetheless. It is part of the system called “Islam”, and it’s what a Western country can expect when it imports Muslims en masse. The systematic rape of infidel women is part of the process of Islamization.

Many thanks to Kitman for translating, subtitling, and YouTubing this clip. The video and a transcript are below the jump:


Transcript:

00:01 In Oslo all sexual assaults involving rape in the past year
00:06 have been committed by males of non-western background.
00:10 This was the conclusion of a police report published today.
00:13 This means that every single rape assault in the last five years,
00:16 where the rapist could be identified, he was a man of foreign origin.
00:22 The young girl we are about to meet was raped about two years ago.
00:27 As she entered her apartment she was assaulted and endured
00:30 hours of the threats and violence and rape by a man unknown to her.
00:34 She will be struggling with this experience for the rest of her life.
00:37 I have found it difficult to go out shopping on my own because I felt anxious.
00:41 I was simply too afraid to go out the door, and had problems contacting
00:45 and speaking to friends and family and simply live a normal life.
00:51 In April a few weeks ago, four women were assaulted and raped on the same night.
00:57 None of the perpetrators has yet been found.
00:59 Today Oslo police presented the total figures
01:02 revealing how in the past year, all sexual assaults involving rape
01:06 have been committed by men of non-western background.
01:09 These are troubling statistics
01:11 From 2005-2010 a total of 86 sexual assaults involving rape were reported.
01:16 In 83 cases the man was described as having “non-western appearance”.
01:20 These are all the cases in which the perpetrator could be identified by the victim
01:25 Many of the perpetrators who commit these rapes are on the edge of society,
01:30 often unemployed, arriving from traumatized countries.
01:33 In the past five years it has often been asylum seekers.
01:37 This girl was raped by a man of Pakistani heritage.
01:40 She is an ethnic Norwegian as is almost all victims who are assaulted and then raped
01:46 “He said, that he had the right to do exactly as he wanted to a woman.”
01:51 Why? “Because that is how it was in his religion.”
01:55 “Women did not have rights or opinions, he was in charge.”
02:00 The way women are viewed is at least one of the questions we have to ask
02:07 in order to understanding the motive of the perpetrators.
02:10 It should not stand on its own, as a stigma,
02:13 but it is an element we must have the courage to address.


For a complete listing of previous enrichment news, see The Cultural Enrichment Archives.

26 comments:

Egghead said...

"The way women are viewed is at least one of the questions we have to ask in order to understanding (sic) the motive of the perpetrators. It should not stand on its own, as a stigma...."

Why not? Why should Islam - a Satanic totalitarian "religion" that sanctions rape (especially gang rape and pedophile rape) of infidel women and children (in addition to Muslim women and children) - escape stigma?!

philip.zhao said...

Is" Non-Westerner" used here an euphemism for Muslim ?

Ex-Dissident said...

Having the courage to protect your children and kick the vermin out would be preferable.

latté island said...

The news report was excellent because it didn't avoid the issues. Not only the ethnic angle, which is absolutely not mentioned on American tv, but also the fact that the perp used his religion as an excuse. This is never mentioned on American tv either.

Also, the attitude of the police, that we have to understand the perp's motivation, and that it shouldn't be a stigma. Wow! Is she really saying we shouldn't stigmatize rape, as long as the rapist has a good excuse? She seems to think law enforcement is like social work.

Gary said...

The rapists should be castrated and deported to their sharia compliant hell-holes of which there are 57 to choose from.

Cyrus said...

It should be a full Chinese style castration at that so as to remove the offending implement.

gsw said...

tut tut, all these calls for castration, not nice, I prefer the more human solution of a bullet through the head.
Well, ok, castration for child rapists - and then a bullet through the brain.

philip.zhao said...

On second reading of the transcript, I noticed that the rapists were " asylum seekers".
Good, send them to the asylum where they belong. In fact, the whole Europe has become an asylum !

Sagunto said...

Meh, all these calls for bullets and castrations.. far too considerate i.m.o.

I'd say: take 'em to Detroit!

After a few days, they may come and beg for less sophisticated means of torture.

;-)
Sag.

idomeneo said...

i am surprised that this phenomenon is getting coverage by the P.C. norwegien press. perhaps this is progress. it takes the rapes of how many innocent women by these subhumans before atttention is given, i doubt if any of these "asylum seekers" will be deported however. this makes my blood boil, the only way to fight these people is with brutality, turning the other cheek is a suicidal notion.

Nick said...

Oh for the days of the birch rod on the Isle of Man. Having these beasts bent over, with their bare behind there for all the world to see (naturally this would be filmed and shown on TV and youtube) then flogging their buttocks until they cry and beg for mercy - then they have to serve their jail sentence afterwards. That might not cure the world of this phenomenon - but it'd be a start.

Nick said...

And it goes without saying that it would be a woman wielding the birch rod. How fitting.

Terp Mole said...

Have all Vikings gone to Valhalla?

Where is the martial spirit of this once proud nation?

jon said...

"Arriving from traumatized countries?"

That had me SHOUTING. I'm in a traumatised community. Never raped a muslim once. Or any other religion.

1389 said...

I would suggest that Norwegians of native extraction, especially women and girls, start carrying loaded guns at all times - even if it's illegal at the moment - and be prepared to use them on rapists and murderers without a second thought.

rui said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Lawrence said...

systematic

Is it "Systematic", or is it "Systemic"?

It is Systemic of Islam to put women in their rightful place as secondary to and/or lesser than men.

It is Systematic of Islam to employ rape, beating, oppressive clothing, murder, what-have-you, to force women into submission.

Women in Islamic society who travel alone (without escort or protection) are subject to attack, and they are then judged at fault for that attack for allowing themselves to travel un-escorted.

So why would we think Muslim men would treat non-Mulsim women in any different?

It has very little to do with their race, it is mostly about their gender.

Egghead said...

Mohammed through his words and deeds gave Muslim men the "right" to rape and enslave non-Muslim women captured in war - and the whole world is considered to be at war until the entire ummah is ruled by Sharia Law.

P.S. The woman was raped in her home where the Muslim man brought the jihad battlefield to the infidel woman.

Baron Bodissey said...

rui --

Gates of Vienna's rules about comments require that they be civil, temperate, on-topic, and show decorum. Your comment violated the last of these rules. We keep a PG-13 blog, and exclude foul language, explicit descriptions, and epithets. This is why I deleted your comment.

Use of asterisks is an appropriate alternative.

----------------------

rui said...

the police is not trying t ounderstand the motives; they're trying NOT to understand the motives. OWN UP TO IT, nobody else believes in PC [foolishness] anymore!

Hesperado said...

Gary wrote:

"The rapists should be castrated and deported to their sharia compliant hell-holes of which there are 57 to choose from."

I'll see you and raise you:

They should be shot on sight as enemy combatants who are exempt from being treated according to the Geneva convention.

MissC said...

Profiling because of religion when the free exercise of such is allowed to infringe on the rights of others? Shame. How un politically correct. Oslo needs to look at arming their citizens and girls and women need to take self-defence courses.

As to the smart-alecky comment about 'Do you think he was a Mormon?' I find that mildly annoying and insulting. I am not going to call for a retraction, but point out that Mormons and Muslims treat their women and women in general, very differently.
If you are referring to a polygamist, then so specify. Thank you.

Baron Bodissey said...

MissC --

Don't bruise yourself jumping to conclusions.

I used "Mormon" as an example to point out how absurd it would be to imagine that any religion but Islam would sanction such barbarity.

I could just as readily have named "Zoroastrian", "Shinto", or "Wiccan", but "Mormon" happened to be what popped into my head.

Hesperado said...

Mormons used to be a problem, during their first approximately 50 years or so, in the 19th century, when they caused considerable "fitna in the land", sufficient to get the attention of the governor of Missouri and in turn for him to convince the federal government to contribute troops to fight, kill and expel Mormons further Westward.

But Mormons have shown themselves capable, in a matter of mere decades after that, and continuing to this day -- of doing something Muslims have not shown any capacity for in the past 1400 years: to change, to calm down, to maturely and productively assimilate into non-Mormon society.

Sure, some Mormons can be annoying at times, and they do hold kooky ideas; but they don't explode like Muslims do -- and that's all that matters to me.

If tomorrow Mormons, or Zoroastrians, or Wiccans, or Buddhists, or Hindus, or Shintoists, or Druids, or Wittgensteinians, or fans of the National Hockey League began doing (and continued doing) what Muslims are doing all over the world, I wouldn't hesitate to condemn them and advocate the same reasonable measures of self-defense against them that I do against Muslims.

David said...

While I feel very sorry for the victims of these atrocious rapes, Norwegians have only themselves to blame for permitting this state of affairs to arise. Instead of tackling the sociopathic behaviour of their new immigrants, they attempt to buy off their depraved conduct by condemning Israel for protecting itself and Jews in general with anti-semitic comments which go so far as to suggest that Norwegian Jews deserve to be beaten up in the streets because of the perceived treatment of Palestinians by Israel! Wake up Norway!! When all your Jews have left, who will then be blamed for the fact that Norwegian women can no longer leave their homes without fear of being raped or worse.

Sagunto said...

David -

wrote:

"Norwegians have only themselves to blame"

If you'd written "Norwegian political elites", I would have agreed completely. Now, with the suggestion that it is actually the Norwegian populace who is to blame, I have strong reservations about this type of comment. Why not distinguish between ordinary people of a country and the political elites who supposedly represent them?

Kind regs from Amsterdam,
Sag.

MissC said...

You will be glad to know that I am a tad thicker-skinned than that.

The context you provided was helpful. I do come here to read the latest, since the media isn't reporting the truth.

The reason I found the comment the way I did was because there are too few people who make the distinction between a polygamist and a Mormon, and forget that Muslims practice plural marriage.
Hence the difference in treatment and practice.
I do enjoy reading your blog.
Thank you for the clarification and letting me respond.

@ Hesperado: The Extermination Order was rescinded in the 1970s. For Missouri, that's progress.

Back to the 'rape at will' the Norwegians are dealing with; are there laws against people protecting themselves with guns?

What is being done to strengthen any right to self-defense laws? I know that here in my home state of Georgia we have laws that permit people to kill in self-defense. Would rape be covered under such a law? Explain, please.

Thank you.