'Vienna Viewed from the Belvedere Palace', by Canaletto, Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna

At the siege of Vienna in 1683 Islam seemed poised to overrun Christian Europe. We are in a new phase of a very old war.

 

                                       

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

The Emperor is Naked

by Baron Bodissey

The Emperor’s New ClothesGates of Vienna’s mission statement requires it to do battle with the Great Islamic Jihad in the realm of ideas.

We agree with Fjordman and many others that the Jihad is just a symptom, and that the enemy lies within. This war is a civil war within the West, between traditional Western culture and the forces of politically correct multicultural Marxism that have bedeviled it for the last hundred years. It is being fought in the back halls and cloisters of the culture, with untenured nobodies like me wielding a salad fork against the broadswords and maces of the fully-armored knights of the media and the academy.

Even so, there’s no doubt that the Emperor has no clothes. He struts up and down the esplanades of the culture with his full entourage, confident of his own splendor, but wearing his birthday suit.

Ours is the collective voice of the little boy in the crowd who dares to say, “The Emperor is naked.” It’s just not loud enough to be heard.

- - - - - - - - - -
*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

In the comments on last night’s post, Phanarath approached the issue with his usual cheerful optimism:

The good news is that once we have defeated the enemy at home, we might find that there are no serious enemies abroad. Just remove the funding from the leftinflated monsters and most of them turn to dust.

He’s right, but that simple phrase “Just remove the funding” conceals an almost unimaginably difficult task. It would be easier to cap Mount St. Helens than to stop the funding of the Left. The Marxist/Multicultural cancer has metastasized and multiplied its blood vessels in order to tap into government at every level, not to mention corporate, civic and charitable organizations. From the United Way to McDonalds to Microsoft, from your federal tax check to the entrance fee at a state park — more than twenty cents out of every dollar you spend nourishes, by one means or another, the ravenous and parasitic leftist behemoth that aims to destroy the culture it feeds on.

So, to quote Lenin: What is to be done?

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

In a post last week, commenter Vicktorya said this:

I’ve never thought of myself as an activist, and wouldn’t care for the title, but I do “get it”, and can read the writing on the wall, and KNOW that the MSM (aka left-leaning media) is killing us. There are some bright spots, of course. But the propaganda work is so pervasive and strong…

But I’m asking, what can we do, moreso, together? I wish to leverage our intention into effective action, and invite hints, suggestions, cooperation…

Well, what can we do, if we work together?

I have said before that the blogosphere is developing enormous power, but so far it has been a reactive power, and not a proactive one. When we swarm something, we have a real effect, and can collectively sway the course of events.

But it seems we’re always responding to something. First was Trent Lott’s gaffe at the Strom Thurmond birthday party. Then came Dan Rather and “fake but accurate.” We helped the Swiftboat Vets leverage their effort against John Kerry into an effective response. And the recent Fauxtography scandal was a bloggers’ triumph.

But all of these accomplishments are reactive. Even as we respond effectively to the enemy’s tactical moves, we cede him the initiative. This drains us of our energy to think and act strategically, to be innovative and creative, and thus surprise our antagonists.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Some of our readers are old enough to remember the conservative initiative back in the mid-’80s which aimed to organize the purchase of CBS and thus “become Dan Rather’s boss”. The effort caused some eye-popping alarm among liberals before it petered out later in the decade.

I’d like to revive that meme here, in a slightly different version. Back then, the takeover bid was to be funded by wealthy Republican individuals and organizations, and aimed to acquire enough shares to tip the balance in the CBS boardroom.

Why not hybridize that meme with the Swiftvets initiative? The Swifties had an enormous impact without attracting any wealthy contributors.

What if the blogosphere were to convince a few hundred thousand people to give $50, or $100, or $500 to a holding company established for the sole purpose of acquiring a controlling interest in a major organ of the liberal media?

Some of the law bloggers (Glenn Reynolds and Eugene Volokh come to mind) could set up a holding company for the assets collected. Bring in a business blogger like Larry Kudlow to help run the show. The full purchase price wouldn’t have to be amassed, just the marginal amount that would help leverage the rest.

I’m ignorant of both law and business, so there are probably dozens of reasons why my idea is a stupid one. I have no doubt that commenters will arrive in force to point out the details of my foolishness and offer their own more expert ideas.

But that’s the great thing about the distributed intelligence in action here — with enough knowledgeable and clever people at work on it, a viable idea can emerge and be implemented.

But — only if its time has come.

When its time has come, the meme will explode, and nothing will be able to stop it.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

I’ve said repeatedly that, if we want to win this war, we need to take back the culture. In order for that to happen, the organs of mass communication will have to change. The new media — of which this blog is a microscopic piece — will eventually supplant the old ones. Eventually Katie Kouric and Paul Krugman will become quaint historical artifacts, a set of wax statues at Madame Tussaud’s.

There’s no doubt that the Emperor has no clothes, and in due course everyone will become aware of it and start to snicker at his pale and flabby flesh.

But, thanks to the Jihad, we may not have enough time to wait for this process to unfold. We may have to put on our pajamas and go to work to help it along.

The siege of ConstantinopleWe really are at a cultural version of the Gates of Vienna. The enemy has driven the traditional culture back inside its fortifications, and is busy digging tunnels to undermine the walls. Many of our people have been captured or converted, and the remnant is just barely holding out, drinking rainwater from the rooftop cisterns and eating dogs just to stay alive.

Only this time there will be no King of Poland to ride down the hill in a glorious charge. This time there will be no Jan III Sobieski to save our sorry fundament.

We’re going to have to do this one ourselves.

So: if you like this meme, or any of the others you see here, spread ’em around. None of this will take off without the support of at least one of the major blogs, so hit Charles (or one of the others) upside the head with a two-by-four until he picks up the meme.

And if these memes die, more will be along later. Pay attention; watch for the one whose time has come, and then help spread it.

Also: have that hundred dollar bill ready to hand out to the right cause when the moment arrives.

 

Baron Bodissey | 9/26/2006 10:44:00 AM

Links to this post:

Create a Link

65 Comments:

 
To add a link in a comment, use this format:
<a href="http://mywebsite.com">My Title</a>
Blogger IMBch said...

I agree with your comments. I believe that it is almost too late and that the present situation could transform into aan open civil war within Europe. I really fail to understand until when the European will accept being insulted and coerced in their own countries by Islamo-fascists who take advantage of the democracy to implement their thein own agenda. It is also unacceptable to allow these people to continue in incite hatred and murder. Enforcing the laws should be a first. Those who are not appy to live by the local laws should emigrate to other Islamic paradizes such as Iran, Saudi Arabia or Pakistan...

9/26/2006 12:12 PM  
Blogger Mission Impossible said...

Above a certain threshold, advertisers would suddenly get self-interested. Once eyes on page numbers reach attractive levels, your idea would begin to take off under its own steam. At some point, I sense mainstream news-reports are going to have to consider contacting Bloggers for data and analysis, instead of un-recognized talking heads sent forth by academe or business.

In order to displace parts of the MSM, Bloggers (or a blogger alliance) will have to engage in marketing and push their agenda outwards. For this to happen, and be sustained, I expect some external financial backing would be required.

This would require all the usual marketing paraphernalia: logos, symbols, unified design, advertising, legal team, etc.

It's doable, but won't be if limited to electronic contact. What will be required soon is some kind of conference or convention, held annually, where the top conservative bloggers can meet over beers and work out a strategy that won't bruise too many egos. Coming out from behind our nom de plumes may be difficult for some, but it can be done.

Might be difficult to choose a leader, but just making the effort would be a big step forward. Maybe choosing an outsider would be the best way forward; say a TV or Movie personality to front the new movement?

A constitution of sorts will need to be framed to avoid one Blog riding roughshod over another due to jealousies, as the public limelight begins to shine on Bloggers.

For what they're worth, those are my reactive thoughts to your musings Baron.

9/26/2006 12:47 PM  
Blogger Zonka said...

I like the idea of the blogosphere become less reactive and more proactive, at the moment I think that we're more or less preaching to the choir, and granted opening the eyes a a few others. However, the main purpose at the moment if the anti-jihad bloggers is to give room for venting and reacting to the events that happen and the media, politicians and elites that closes their eyes to those events.

Don't get me wrong this is an important and useful function, however, it would be good to see the anti-jihad blogosphere starting focusing more on solutions as well. What can we do to stop the tide before it is too late, both the Islamic tide but also their sympathizers on the left.

I think it is self-evident that a lot of people are feeling powerless to do anything about it, short of talking about extreme solutions, simply because of the magnitude of the problem and because the media and the general public have been successful in portraying this conflict (to the extent that they have understood it properly) to be immensely complex and the magnitude unbelievable just by the sheer size of opponents. Whereas the truth is that it is a very simple conflict, we're facing an enemy that wants nothing but their way or the highway! And then unfortunately a lot of people who are either scared by that prospect, or thinking they can ride the tiger and control it to do the dirty job (the leftist collaborators) and those who just have a really hard time understanding that evil does exist, and that no everybody wants the same as us, and therefore cannot be reasoned with, simply because we lack common ground on values.

So yes, I think it's about time to move beyond reactive and becoming proactive.

9/26/2006 2:17 PM  
Blogger Knit Knack said...

Ron Silver might be interested in being a part of something like this. Or Patricia Heaton or Bo Derek. A call to Screen Actor's Guild and they will tell you who their respective agents are. Then you contact the agent and hope they will give you some kind of access to the actor.

9/26/2006 3:55 PM  
Blogger Canker said...

Baron,

First, don't write off Europe (or the Anglosphere if you prefer to be more picky).
I work (as an academic), live and blog in the UK, and I know that the tide is slowly, extremely slowly, turning (see the first half of my post
http://canker-canker.blogspot.com/2006/09/venezuelan-airport-blues.html
for some details).

Secondly, take what the Pope had to say very, very seriously. He described the wellsprings of Western civilization very simply and accurately: the synthesis of Greek philosophy and Judeo-Christian religion/sprituality.

With an understanding of these things we can, eventually, trounce the opposition.
When I speak to the young, the intelligent onest(the future movers and shakers) do not have much time for the indoctrination they've received from the left liberals. They are a major resource, provided we catch them before they are indoctrinated at university.

I think your `corporate ideas' are excellent, but they really need an ideological backing. This is where right wing bloggers are still having trouble-they know what they don't want; they may well known what they do want, but until they admit where it's coming from and embrace it, they sound a little unfocused.

9/26/2006 4:03 PM  
Blogger Titus Aduxass said...

The odious George Galloway is already ahead of you. Here in the UK it was reported that he had already been busy approaching the Saudis to buy out a quality (if there's one left), Brit newspaper and do a Murdoch.
The concept is right dear Lady and Baron, but time is short.
I would gladly give what little financial support I could to create an effective mouthpiece for common sense.
By the way there was an excellent piece of reportage/opinion transmitted on UK TV Channel 5 to night by journo David Arronovich.
It's a must view.
Harry's Place blog is asking if anyone cant get a copy on to YouTube.
I'll keep you posted.

Kind regards and keep safe Titus

9/26/2006 4:15 PM  
Blogger kepiblanc said...

Canker is right : The tide is turning. A recent example from Denmark (again, sorry) :

The hottest selling book title over here is "Islamists and Naïvists". It's very hard to get a copy because the books sell faster than the publisher can print them. The authors are two socialists - Ralph Pittelkow and Karen Jespersen. The former used to be a personal advisor to a PM and the latter a minister of internal affairs. And they hit the nail right on : the enemy to fear isn't the stupid, ignorant and incompetent Muslims, but our own nomenklatura - the useful idiots.

There is an excellent review here :
Danish wake-up call on Islam

9/26/2006 4:45 PM  
Blogger MrSmith said...

The contributors at A Tangled Web have been talking amongst ourselves about something like this. Perhaps a Euro-Anglo alliance could help somewhat? After all, it's our shared culture, history, and future on the line here.

9/26/2006 5:33 PM  
Blogger beyond_comics said...

Rather than just give the money, why not issue shares? This way, the manager would be accountable.

You propose a Holding Company that owns one stock (CBS). It would not have to be limited to just CBS, but any and all publicly traded media companies. Structurally, it would resemble what the mutual fund industry refers to as a ‘Sector Fund’.

The holding company could access the bond market in order to gain leverage. It would be similar to buying on margin in your brokerage account.

9/26/2006 5:40 PM  
Blogger Michael said...

I'd agree strongly with you that the home grown far left is millions of times more dangerous that Islamic radicalism, even if the latter does get lots of media coverage.
I have written on my blog in the past several articles relating to the leftists desire to subvert and destory Western civilization, in my article such as Revolutionary Defeatism:The key to understanding the far left I have also written other articles on my blog which deal with various ways liberals are acheiving this goal.
I would agree that we on the right are far too defensive at the moment. I wrote an article a while ago where I discussed tactics for culture war victoryTactics for Culture War Victory

In it I discuss possible strategic considerations.

9/26/2006 5:51 PM  
Blogger Beach Girl said...

As usual, I need to take notes when I read some of the posts and comments. Count me in financially. I will be naive here and state that legislatively, we (in USA) should not allow external investors (Saudi princes) to own any interests in our news media. That we are down to 5 publishing houses with a kazillion imprints does not speak well for "freedom" of the press, etc.

Canker has some good points about us seeming to be unfocused. And we are reactive but that is because we have not defined our goals and our plan for reaching them. I'm sure the jihadists have painstakingly finite plans for each mission no matter how small in scope. Each mission adds strength to the overall mission.

Maybe we are talking to each other right now but we are building a base. Perhaps we could decide on one small, measurable objective - aside from the focus of our individual blogs, like passing the Public Expression of Religion Act and getting behind that.

Another thing is to get public money away from NPR as an example. Ending our funding of the ACLU. I know these sound very minor but I think if we could cut off their funds or reduce the funds dramatically that would be a help. By funding the ACLU, as an example, we are using our own money to fund an organization that wants to "cut our throats". In effect, we are funding what some might call a "terrorist" organization with a little 't'.

Yes, our war is internal. If we had not been weakened by it, I submit we would not be having the jihadist boldness that we see today. They smell the blood in the water and want to get their cuts in too because if our nitwits buy into their victimology - you can't tell the truth about islam, we're all duck soup.

The corporate ideas are essential for us to have a voice. Ron Silver is a good choice. Can we begin to be proactive by choosing one thing we want to accomplish? Just one. Something that advances our cause, neutralizes an organization like CAIR, and let's us work as they do in our own way with our agenda. As someone said, we don't have an agenda. The thing about freedom is that you can't legislate everything that a person can do, only the much smaller list of what he can't do.

I'll help with my 100.00 or so. Let me know the legislation we want to pass. I'll help there too. About CAIR, et al, they are following the ACLU's lead and picking away one little chisel pick at a time. So, how do we pick back?

9/26/2006 5:54 PM  
Blogger Beach Girl said...

Went over to read Michael's links to his posts. Very good. Something to work with. Thanks.

Baron, you have the internation reader base. Maybe we could become proactive piece by piece but working from many nations at the same time. Why not?

We can have a list of assignments and then research and hammer away at a given issue. We are smarter than the left, even if they did pull a fast one in the Senate with needing 61 votes to pass anything. We are not as creative in our interpretation of the rules of the playing field. We think we know what the rules are then the libs change them on us. That is one possible reason why we are always reacting.

9/26/2006 6:06 PM  
Blogger Titus Aduxass said...

By a strange coincidence I opened a thread on the web forum of the British Humanist Association entitled 'The Kings new clothes?'. One of the group was unaware of how the threat of Islamic Fascism is taking grip in the world and asked me that if this was so, what would I do. This is my response ...

Re: The King’s new clothes? Posted: 26/09/2006 19:06:13 GMT
ted matthews

Ok, What should be done?

First of all, the situation has to be recognised by all countries in the EU and any measures agreed should be implemented universally and audited by external commissions.

Secondly, national borders need to reintroduced and controlled.

Third, establish the money trails to banks in the like of countries such as Switzerland, Lichtenstein and other financial sanctuaries that are scattered around the world and freeze the assets of the fundamentalists and their organisations.

Ban the introduction of new Muslim Charities, Fudamentalist groups or organisations and intensely scrutinise the accounts and activities of the present ones.

On the domestic front, stop all immigtation with the exception of EU nationals with required skills and or the means that will be of benefit to the UK.
With hold state benefits for the first five years of residence.

All persons in the UK to hold a UK passport only (No dual Nationality), and only then on condition of providing a DNA sample.

Reduce family allowance to benefit the first child only.

Reintroduce 2 years National Service for all males between 18 and 25.

So Bryan you have put me clearly on the spot and I have responded more or less with off the cuff statements or suggestions. Through clenched teeth, I expect strong criticism because I know these are extrenme suggestions. But if the future is as bleak as some of my fears, I take comfort in knowing that when this country was last fighting to survive, it did take extreme measures, stood its ground to give my generation at least, one of the best standards of living, social development and security than anywhere in Europe.

Let me put it back to you, or anyone else; What would you do?

regards tm

As yet I have had no comments but I shall continue to brandish my 'sald fork'

9/26/2006 6:19 PM  
Blogger shoprat said...

the blogosphere has already had more influence than the MSM likes. It was able to bring down Dan Rather, humiliate Bill Clinton, and now has the MSM being just a little more careful (though no less left wing). The work has already started.

9/26/2006 6:45 PM  
Blogger Michael said...

I think blogs have a major part to play. To me, the key to defeating the far left is to out-flank its MSM with alternative media, for example blogging. Another good strategy is to phone into local radio stations and debate issues related to the culture war. Local newspapers and radio stations tend to be more receptive to our views than the MSM left wing noise machine. Plus local outlets have lots of dedicated listeners.

9/26/2006 7:08 PM  
Blogger LA.Bueche said...

Another simple thing you can do. Cancel your subscription to your local, left-wing, MSM newspaper. I dropped the LA Times after I had my political awakening and I've really never missed it. Circulations of traditional, left leaning newspapers are already declining. Maybe when they get low enough, the owners will consider opening their minds, (and newsprint), to alternative, non- left POVs.

9/26/2006 7:15 PM  
Blogger unaha-closp said...

To destroy the Left requires destroying its core ideal - egalitarianism. This says that all people have equivalent inherent worth and they should be granted equal means to achieve to their abilities. The Left thinks that to actuate certain unalienable rights people need the means to do so.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness."

You have to prove that granting people resource to pursue happiness at their liberty is the greatest evil.

Jihad denies that people are of equal inherent worth. Jihad denies that people have a right to liberty, pursuit of happiness or even life. Jihad holds these beliefs to be the worthless scribblings of godless men on ragged old paper, not sacrosanct in any way. Jihad does not care for either liberty or egalitare. Yet you contend "that the Jihad is just a symptom" of egalitarianism, how do you make this leap?

9/26/2006 7:34 PM  
Blogger BJS said...

Lots of lovely ideas, but...

We will never win, until the end of the world. I am Catholic and I know that sin is in all of us and cannot be defeated. Any victory will be short, local and soon corrupted. Happily, that's true of any defeat, though corrected not corrupted.

But that ain't the point, which is that the fight is the point.

So, carry on. Hit 'em high, hit em low, kick em in the privates and...

Never Surrender.

That is true goodness.

9/26/2006 8:54 PM  
Blogger Beach Girl said...

Titus, way to go. Your suggestions are not extreme. They are, unfortunately, common sense. If you don't mind, I'll copy them to work with a bit. They are very good and can be refined into steps that are attainable. Not quickly perhaps but still something to work with.

Michael, I stopped taking my local paper long ago. They don't call me anymore either upon my request.

9/26/2006 9:08 PM  
Blogger Da Bear said...

To battle is to carry the fight into the enemies center mass; truth spoken at his schools, Islams's hate flickering daily on his TV and counter counter cultural dissonance in his newspapers and blogs.

Our Emperor needs not only to see a mirror to remove the vails of delusional mass denial.

Baron, yet again, succinctly postulates the improbable into the imaginable.

So, how exactly do you solve a problem like Maria? With smarts and money. Smarts to have a solid plan for battle, and the money to carry out the plan.

Let us look back at Lieut. General Albert Coady Wedemeyer. (background lifted from a Time cover article in 1945)

As a young officer, he was not distinguished. Five years later Lieut. Wedemeyer was sent out to the 15th Infantry at Tientsin, China. The vast, stirring nation, slowly shaping from revolutionary chaos into a modern nation under the hand of young Chiang Kaishek, fascinated the U.S. officer. He studied Chinese. But Wedemeyer turned down a chance for a career in the China service. In 1934 he was back in the U.S.

Somewhere along the routine line, something had happened to Wedemeyer. He began to study economics, foreign affairs, history and the new concept of air power. A mind that can be as cold and rigorous as a steel trap had found something to bite on. In 1936, Wedemeyer (now a captain after 15 years as lieutenant) graduated from the General Staff School at Leavenworth with such high honors that he was chosen to attend the German General Staff School, Berlin's famed Kriegsakademie. The minds inside the bullet heads of the Wehrmacht officers hit the receptive mind of the U.S. captain with the impact of a robomb. German officers,* he found, were less flexible than U.S. military men. But they lived, breathed and dreamed war. They understood war as politics and peace as politics.

Later the War Department frisked Wedemeyer's memory for tidbits about Hitler, Göring, Goebbels and other Nazis. It showed scant interest in his incisive opinions about the Wehrmacht's masterminds and master weapons. Only one man took the captain's technical report seriously—Brigadier General George Marshall, then assistant chief of staff of the War Plans Division. Marshall had a long talk with the military student from Germany. When he became Chief of Staff, he remembered Wedemeyer.

General's General. So in 1941, the year the Wehrmacht turned from its victories in the West to overrun the Balkans and penetrate Russia, Wedemeyer was assigned to the War Plans Division. His job was to draw up the first overall war plan for the U.S. After Pearl Harbor, his estimates became the basic pattern of the U.S. war effort. By 1942's end, Wedemeyer was a member of Marshall's inner group, a key figure in overall strategy. He had become a general's general. He accompanied General Marshall on all the great conferences from Casablanca through Teheran. He had an important hand in Allied Mediterranean strategy and in the planning of the Normandy invasion.

So what was the war plan that beat the Germans? Simply put, It was to create a mirror image of the Wehrmacht that would thrive under American ingenuity and improvisation, and unlimited American production that sacrified machines for men in every possible situation.

We too need to create our own Cultural Mirror, using the same reflections as the MSM to win victory for our values.

Asymmetrical warfare goes only so far...We need Patton and the 3rd Army roaring across the French countryside after smashing their Doppleganger ( the German 7th) in the Falaise pocket. Yea.... that's the ticket!

Da Bear

9/26/2006 9:38 PM  
Blogger Titus Aduxass said...

Da Bear, are you pissed or just a Saddo, you have contibuted nothing but crap to this quality website!
Sober up or get a new brain.

9/26/2006 9:55 PM  
Blogger Papa Ray said...

Yes, we could buy them out, but can we not force them to change their tune by other means?

I guess what I mean, is to remind everyone that one way to stop (or re-direct) behaviour in these United States (legally) is to hurt the offender in their pocketbook.

I suppose that could be counter productive in some cases, but in the case of the media, it is not.

Convincing citizens to not subscribe to certain newsrags or watch certain networks would take a large PR effort, using all available means.

A nationwide effort, by blogs, radio and ads in that same media, denouncing their bias and anti-american practices would cost money, but it would get the message out to the man on the street and the small towns of America.

A couple of examples would be to enlist AARP, NRA, the major magazines and the dozens of American agriculture magazines.

Direct mailings could be hired out to those that now flood our mailboxes with trash.

We have to remember that most Americans don't blog, don't get their news off the internet, and are not really aware of the danger and the damage being done by the Media's actions.

In the distant past, the message would be spread by preachers, messengers, activists, riding into town and holding meetings in the townhall or in the churches.

Which might still work in a lot of small towns.

Forcing the MSM to change their tune has got to be done. If this were Iran or most anywhere else in the world, it would be simple.

The Government would force it, or shut them down.

Which reminds me, didn't some newspapers get shut down during WWII?

There is another flank of this battle that must be won. The battle over the minds of our children.

We have to direct our anger and energys at the educational system of the United States. Our country has a low literacy rate as compared to other developed countries. Our reading literacy rate is good (not great) but in science and math, we rank below average in the developed nations of the world.

In the area of American History, our students only get the minimum and some of it is so slanted as to almost be re-writing history. I know this from personal experience and the reading of others opinion that have children.

I might mention that I am on a first name basis with my local school board and they know where I and many other parents in this area stand on all issues.

There is a reason why Homeschooling is a fast rising industry here.

The liberal, anti-american socialist teachings and leanings of our institutions has to be changed. Our children are being brainwashed and have been for many years.

Papa Ray
West Texas
USA

9/26/2006 9:56 PM  
Blogger The Real Sporer said...

the only way to change this is for conservatives and Republicans to get control on as many school boards as possible.

Our educational system is destroying our culture-primarily because is believes our culture is fundamentally evil and flawed.

Remember the Nazi inter-generational mantra "today your children, tomorrow the world"

9/26/2006 10:09 PM