Sarah Maid of Albion has published the second installment of her “Genocide by Stealth” series. Some excerpts are below
In the first part of this essay I argued that vast social changes resulting from deliberate acts by the governments of Europe and all other, one time white, Western nations have succeeded in meeting at least one of the United Nations definitions of what constitutes an act of genocide against an ethnic group.
Easy, free, and officially encouraged access to oral contraception, the legalisation of abortion, effectively on demand, and changes to the economic structure which have forced the average family unit to cease consisting of one breadwinner and one child carer, but instead to become formed of two breadwinners, have resulted directly in a catastrophic reduction in the birth rate among whites of native European origin.
All three changes have resulted directly from deliberate social or economic engineering on the part of post war governments, and it is impossible to argue that a reduction in births was not a primary aim, at least of the first two or that a reduction in births has been a direct result of the third.
Therefore, I would submit for your consideration the fact that, whether through ill will or otherwise, measures have been put in place intended to prevent births within the targeted group. That targeted group being white native Europeans. This means of Genocide is clearly defined in Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
Meanwhile, as I argued in part one, during the same period, monumental efforts have been made, by those same western governments to increase the birth rate amongst other races and ethnic groups.
Some may argue that counter measures, such as welfare benefits, and, indeed child benefit itself, have been put in place which actively encourage childbirth. However, as the figures clearly demonstrate, they have not had this effect, at least, they have not done so amongst the target group. White wage earners may welcome child benefit, but it is only those whites at the very lowest social levels who might consider welfare benefits an incentive to breed.
On the other hand, given that the welfare state in Britain and similar welfare arrangements Europe are among of the primary incentives for mass inward migration and that it is primarily amongst immigrant families in receipt of welfare and child benefits that a significant growth in birth rates has been seen, far from counterbalancing that damaging effect of other policies, this has, if anything, in fact added to the damage done to the native European people.
That is because, the inward migration honey pot created by a free for all Welfare state is one of the many ways by which a further act fitting the description of genocide has been committed. That is the deliberate infliction on the targeted group of conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.
I would contend that the mass third world immigration into every single Western nation has created conditions which will lead to the destruction of the native European peoples, at very least in part.
[…]
It is often lamented that the sparrows are vanishing from London, but who dare admit so are the Cockneys?.
If the indigenous population of any other region of the world were being deliberately replaced, the word “genocide” would be on the tofu stained lips of every liberal. The UN security council would be in session and Hoxton high street would echo to the shrieks of horror, as Giles and Penelope recounted tales of vacations in Cairo or Bangkok where the locals had been forced out and replaced by people from Porthcawl and Billericay. However, as it is the people of European origin who are being supplanted its considered acceptable.
[…]
It may sound bizarre to claim that our media and our educators have created a fake history and then set about brainwashing us into feeling guilt about things which never happened, or which did not happen in the manner in which our children, and indeed most of the post 1960 generations are taught, but that is actually what is happening.
What out children are being taught in school about our history and our society are lies, pure and simple, and that has been the case now for decades.
This is accompanied throughout childhood and into adulthood by a constant barrage of propaganda forced upon us day and night through our entertainment and news media. Not only are we relentlessly confronted with depictions of the same fake history with which our children are being indoctrinated, but also a fake present, depicted in popular drama, entertainment and through the heavily sanitised and selective spin which now passes for news.
The news is arguably more shameful even than the drama, because it pretends to be objective and truthful when it is the exact reverse. Anything which can be spun to support the fantasy of a multicultural Utopia, the perpetual narrative of non-white victimhood or intrinsic white badness is highlighted with great prominence. Meanwhile anything which could undermine the multicultural dream, reveals whites as victims or exposes badness amongst non-whites is distorted, lied about or suppressed altogether.
[…]
Once one appreciates what is happening you are confronted with it relentlessly, but sadly very few actually realise what is happening, it is, after all, what they have always known and what they have been taught to believe. They hardly even notice when they see themselves being replaced, not least in TV commercials, where progressively the average Briton is portrayed not by a white person, or indeed a black person, but by someone of mixed race, with the subliminal message that this is the new reality they should aspire to.
The outcome is the a flabby, bovine, nation of people who care only for trivia and possessions, who actively believe that the history of their race is shameful, that their country owes a debt of guilt to other nations, and crucially, who do not care if their people were to vanish from the face of the earth.
Worse than that, for many, something in their subconscious tells them it might even be racist to care.
And here I have mentioned the word which has become one of the most deadly weapons used against the European race and the most poisonous agent of their destruction.
“Racist”, that dishonest, multi-purpose, multiple application little word has been used to bully, intimidate and hector our people for decades now as a means of forcing a cynical political agenda upon us which they would never have achieved democratically. We, the most tolerant and benevolent race on Earth, the people least guilty of racial, tribal or xenophobic animus on the planet, have, exclusively, been so terrorised by that little word to the point where we would rather see our own race destroyed than dare be called it.
Read the rest at Sarah’s Albion Blog. Excerpts from Part 1 are here.
8 comments:
"The news is arguably more shameful even than the drama, because it pretends to be objective and truthful when it is the exact reverse. Anything which can be spun to support the fantasy of a multicultural Utopia, the perpetual narrative of non-white victimhood or intrinsic white badness is highlighted with great prominence. Meanwhile anything which could undermine the multicultural dream, reveals whites as victims or exposes badness amongst non-whites is distorted, lied about or suppressed altogether."
It's the same way in the US, especially with regard to white Southerners. Case in point: Celebrating Secession
A very good book for people to read and also recommend to their PC MC friends is "White Gold: The Extraordinary Story of Thomas Pellow and Islam's One Million White Slaves" by Giles Milton.
As the 43 yr. old mother of nine children (the youngest turns one year old, Lord willing, this January) I find the reality of the disapperance of Western European children to be much less conspiratorial and much more basic-- my generation does not want to do that hard work associate with raising a bunch of kids. They don't want to make the sacrifice of time and money, they don't want to dedicate that time and money to raising kids as a primary activity of life.
Why don't we want to? Because we've been told it's stupid to do so. We've been sold a bill of goods, that it's more enlightened to have fewer children than it is to have more.
As I've gone through 18 yrs. of child bearing and child rearing, a married woman through all of them, I didn't find anyone saying "wow, wonderful on you for resisting the oppression of Western peoples and the reduction of your race" or anything remotely like that. What I got was "is your husband a brute? How come he makes you have all these kids, is he trying to prove he's a real man? How do you get Time For Yourself (that is huge)? Don't you know the world is overpopulated? How can you be so selfish? Well, that's ok for you, you have easy pregnancies (what a laugh!). Well, your husband makes money, you can do that if you want. I don't have the patience for kids, you must be a saint (that's a huge laugh, lol). How will you put them through college? Aren't you smart enough to get a job? I couldn't spend my day doing nothing but changing diapers" and on and on ad nauseum.
What I'd like to see is less talk and more babies. Every married person of childbearing age with a concern for the loss of what they consider their people or their race should put action to their words and have a minimun of five children. If they are unwilling to do so, their talk is empty.
Full disclosure-- I didn't have lots of kids because I'm worried about the loss of my race, unless one wants to say I was worried about the loss of the Christian race.
Quote:
On the other hand, given that the welfare state in Britain and similar welfare arrangements Europe are among of the primary incentives for mass inward migration and that it is primarily amongst immigrant families ...
end quote.
But such social service networks do not have to serve as incentives at all.
They can be preserved if a set of conditions is arrived at for their distribution that does not favor the immigrant over the indigenous Western person.
Democratic discourse can be restricted without being abaondoned altogether.
I would suggest we restrict it according to our needs for the preservation of the West against Islam.
I came across this recently:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_Room!_Make_Room!
It's a dystopian novel about a world with a population of 7 billion and the USA at 344 million and how that is such a horrible level of overpopulation and this is what will happen if we don't stop having kids RIGHT NOW DAMMIT.
The guy got the idea in 1946, he says.
Well, today, the world is at around 7 billion and the USA at over 300 million and the planet is not so overpopulated. Just certain third world hellholes, and the parts of Western cities given over to third worlders. Try driving around in small towns in the countryside, you'll see abandoned buildings and houses all over the place. Also of course massive carbon-copy little-boxes houses and townhouses springing up like mushrooms on the farmland that used to surround the cities, but that's bad design, not overcrowding.
The conspiracy interpretation doesn't seem to hold water. It's just a wrong idea that a lot of people had, for similar fundamental reasons.
The _result_ of this false idea is pretty much genocidal, though.
Having been brainwashed, post-WW II, by anti-Western idiots in their schools and media and politics with the fatally simplistic view that their own historical and moral flaws [colonialism, warfare in general, etc.) are the only serious flaws on Earth worth considering, or "paying for", the suicidal folly of the taught-to-be-self-loathing Europeans continues.
As if every other culture did not have the exact same flaws, being human, the Europeans and West in general have exonerated the "non-Europeans" of their historical crimes and madnesses and predations because the "non=Europeans" claim that they are "victims".
And are thereby "allowed" to destroy those whom they claimed "victimized" them, and colonize and take over their countries, as "compensation".
People who are so historically and psychologically blind to the nature of human reality are being suckered into extinction.
And deserve it if they can't reason any better than this level of duped imbecility.
In hoc signo vinces
Meanwhile putting aside the trojan Arbeit Macht Frei v welfare debate and getting back to the real business of counterjihad large numbers of British citizens are converting to Islam.
Wonder how many are Thatchers bitter childless career women.
I'm with you on all this, brothers, but I do eat tofu (as well as meat), and politically I am a conservative.
Not offended, but just find the association somewhat chilling.
Post a Comment