I reported on Friday that an “Australian” imam named Feiz Mohammad had issued a fatwa calling for the beheading of Geert Wilders. Needless to say, this is bad for business as far as the Religion of Peace is concerned.
Now the “moderate” imams of Australia are rushing to try to put out the fire lit by Mr. Mohammed. And what are they saying? Why, that imprudent and headstrong young fellow, he’s… he’s… he’s as extreme as Geert Wilders!
Here’s a report from The Sydney Morning Herald, kindly sent to us by our Danish-Australian correspondent Anne-Kit, who follows it with her own commentary:
Preacher’s call for beheading condemned by Muslim leaders- - - - - - - - -
A CONTROVERSIAL Australian Muslim preacher, Feiz Mohammad, has refused to comment on reports he called for the beheading of the Dutch anti-Islamic politician Geert Wilders, as Muslim leaders in Sydney condemned his comments.
Sheikh Feiz yesterday declined to confirm or deny to the Herald that he made the threat that anyone who “mocks, laughs or degrades Islam” like Mr Wilders should be executed “by chopping off his head” in a speech at a sermon in Campbelltown last week.
However, senior Muslim sources said there was some doubt whether the speech, which has been posted on the internet, was made in Sydney or in Malaysia several years ago.
Sheikh Fedaa Majzoub, the vice-president of the NSW branch of the National Imams Council, said that wherever the comments were made, they were “completely rejected by us as Islamic authorities” and were just as extreme as those made by Mr Wilders.
“I have no doubt that greater Australian society would not be at all welcoming to Wilder’s [sic] Islamophobic rants,” Sheikh Fedaa said. “Addressing Wilders should only take place through dialogue … within the legal framework that governs our fair nation.”
The comments were reported in a Dutch newspaper, De Telegraaf, late last week after Dutch intelligence officials were tipped off about the threat to the politician. The circulation of the comments by Sheikh Feiz follows the broadcast of a recent interview with Mr Wilders on SBS TV’s Dateline in which he revealed he was planning to visit Australia.
Sheik Feiz was investigated after the discovery of DVDs of his sermons in which he urged children to become holy warriors and made derogatory comments about Jews.
He was also condemned for a speech in Bankstown in 2005 when he said a rape victim had no one to blame but herself for wearing “satanic skirts”.
Sheik Feiz left Australia later that year and has spent the intervening years living and studying in Malaysia and Lebanon. He is believed to have returned to Australia this year.
The outspoken Sheikh Taj el-Din al Hilaly, the former mufti of Australia and imam at the Lakemba mosque, said that the comments were stupid and idiotic and only caused harm to the Muslim community.
“These stupid threats from Feiz will unfortunately only serve to draw more Islamophobic people to Wilders’s hate-filled cause, giving it value when it has none,” he said.
A spokesman for the Islamic Friendship Association, Keysar Trad, said the comments were appalling and only “gave oxygen” to Mr Wilders.
Anne-Kit has a few thoughts of her own on the matter:
“ … senior Muslim sources said there was some doubt whether the speech, which has been posted on the internet, was made in Sydney or in Malaysia several years ago”
Does it really matter?? He is unlikely to have changed his mind.
“Sheikh Fedaa Majzoub, the vice-president of the NSW branch of the National Imams Council, said that wherever the comments were made, they were ‘completely rejected by us as Islamic authorities’ and were just as extreme as those made by Mr Wilders.” (emphasis mine)
Now, let’s see: Mr Wilders wants to stop immigration from Muslim countries and ban the burqa.
Feiz Mohammed, on the other hand, wants to chop off the heads of people who disagree with him.
In PC la-la-land, one is apparently as extreme as the other. Stop the world, I want to get off!
“Sheik Feiz left Australia […] and has spent the intervening years living and studying in Malaysia and Lebanon. He is believed to have returned to Australia this year.”
Surely from immigration records we should be able to tell if the nutter is here or not? We do have to fill in immigration cards whenever we return from a trip abroad …
5 comments:
Isn't it funny how these MSM outlets giving taqqyia-peddling imams airtime would never talk about their own PC-MC-induced blindness, typical of mahound-loving leftards in general these days, which has turned an ardent supporter of human rights (and freedom of speech, gay rights and women's rights in particular) into an "extremist" or "far-right extremist"?
By the way, this is off topic, but if anyone is interested in the inspiration for my new Blogger avatar, here is where I got the inspiration for it.
Sometimes I have to remind myself that certain aspects of mahoundianism aren't too absurd to be true because, well, most everything concerning that sick little cult is just that way.
Ah yes out come the so called moderate muslims, namely:
1 The outspoken Sheikh Taj el-Din al Hilaly - who was caught out saying that uncovered women are just meat in the eyes of men. of course like everything translated from arabic to English when they had no intention of what they say reaching unislamic ears, it's all "out of context". Heard that before. Yawn.
and
2 Spokesman for the Islamic Friendship Association, Keysar Trad - the mouthpiece of taqqiya and khitman in Australia. Whenever an islamic issue arises in Australia the media automatically go to him for a soothing quote and a smile. When of course quoted anywhere but the lamestream media reveals support support for Hezbollah, shariah, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, suicide murder bombings against Isreal.
The usual 'moderate muslims'.
Hilali was removed from his role as spokesman after the uncovered meat for cats comment, and Trad is one of the favourite go-to guys.
He's the one who used to work for the Tax Office, then went off on stress leave or some such idiocy, and has been sponging off the taxpayers ever since.
No thanks for the jizya, of course, since we owe it to him.
This blog hasn't been updated in forever, but there's still plenty of very interesting stuff here about Keysar.
Also, if I recall correctly, Trad wanted another wife, but his current one objected.
The fact that it's against the law here is obviously irrelevant.
Sheikh Fedaa Majzoub, the vice-president of the NSW branch of the National Imams Council, said that wherever the comments were made, they were “completely rejected by us as Islamic authorities” and were just as extreme as those made by Mr Wilders. [emphasis added]
Just in case Anne-Kit's final and most important point eluded anyone, as in:
Now, let’s see: Mr Wilders wants to stop immigration from Muslim countries and ban the burqa.
Feiz Mohammed, on the other hand, wants to chop off the heads of people who disagree with him.
In PC la-la-land, one is apparently as extreme as the other. [emphasis added]
Please note how the supposedly "moderate" imams are seeking to establish moral equivalency between Geert Wilders' anti-Islam stance and Sheik Feiz's call for premeditated murder.
Taqiyya's siren song continues luring Muslims into revealing the total moral corruption of Islam. After all, what difference is there between Wilders' political defiance of Islam and Islam's politically sanctioned death sentence?
Clearly, it is impossible for Muslims to simply condemn one of their own for effectively issuing a murder contract upon some unbeliever. That simply will not suffice, no matter how appropriate or functional such an action might be.
Instead, they just have to try and establish linkage between justifiable opposition to Islam and the usual murderous spewings of Muslim programmers.
Let us also not forget their attempt to absolve Sheik Feiz's incitement to violence by playing up his role as a poor, innocent Muslim victim. Wilder's own extremism obviously drove the sheik into issuing his death fatwa. If only everyone had just accepted their dhimmi status without rebellion or mischief, all of this horrible Muslim bloodlust could have been handily avoided.
As always, the West's own refusal to submit is the source of so much misery and suffering. Everything would be so much nicer if it weren't for our rejection of Islam's beneficent invitation.
Has everybody had their fill of this crap already?
Post a Comment