Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Make Way for the Redeemer

It’s O-Day at last, and I don’t feel very much like posting anything…

Do you remember Minister King Samir Shabazz and the New Black Panthers of Philadelphia? It seems that the Panthers have been tossing Republican election observers out of polling places in Philly. Go over to Fausta’s blog for a report.

“The black man is going to win this election, no matter what.”

Here’s a Fox News video on one of the incidents:


Philadelphia freedom!

[Post ends here]

39 comments:

spackle said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
spackle said...

Maybe the panthers could be part of Obamas new army?

"We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

Barack Obama July 2, 2008 Colorado Springs

And we think ANTIFA is a problem. I believe it was Dymphna who said it the other day. This must be how it felt in Berlin in the early 30s.

Armance said...

The worst expectations regarding Obama now prove little by little to be true. The Black Panthers - gee. What's next? North-Korean kind of propaganda. Half-jokingly in the past, pure reality tomorrow.

Unknown said...

One of the Black Panthers said he was tired of white supremacy. Does that mean that Americans blacks will view themselves as supremacist if Obama wins? Will they begin to act as violent masters the way they do in Zimbabwae and South Africa? We won't have to wait long to find out.

Fjordman said...

Armance: What's almost worse than Obama is seeing how the big media outlets throughout the Western world have systematically distorted the information presented about him. They see an anti-white fellow Marxist whom they want elected. Marxists control our media. They lie and lie and then lie some more, and don't think twice about doing so. They're Leftists, which means that lying for a Greater Cause is their birthright.

Whiskey said...

Perhaps, Fjordman, but the deeper question is WHY are the media Leftists?

Why?

This is the question that I have thought on for a long, long time. It has puzzled me, because it was not always so. A guy like Murrow, might have had some liberal views, but today he'd be an arch-conservative.

How did that change?

In my view, only broad and deep social changes can account for it.

mikej said...

I'm going to post something optimistic for a change. Obama's election is not a foregone conclusion. The polls could be wildly inaccurate. People who have jobs don't allow pollsters to waste their time, and anyone who has a job, and therefore pays taxes, would be awfully stupid to vote for Barry the Bolshevik. As Fjordman says, the leftist "news media" invariably predict a Marxist victory. The election won't be over until the last lawsuit is settled and the last recount is done. Cheer up, Baron!

Conservative Swede said...

Why don't they show the real clip:

"Black Panthers" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly

I posted it here about an hour ago. Got it from Drudge. Always follow Drudge on an election night.

Darrin Hodges said...

Video of dude with night-stick: http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU (via drudge)

Anonymous said...

Malo,

The Intrade futures market has Obama at 93. That's 93 to 7. This is not a poll.

As I have been betting people for a year, the Democrats win this one.

Conservative Swede said...

"Black Panthers" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly

Btw, since this is a link to youtube, Czechmade will be able to go to its list of associated links, and find a fake video with a phony title (since this is the Internet), and based on that claim that what I just posted is not at all true, but all propaganda. It's not even required to look at the video I posted, to make such a claim, apparently.

Conservative Swede said...

Whiskey,

Perhaps, Fjordman, but the deeper question is WHY are the media Leftists?

Why?

This is the question that I have thought on for a long, long time.


Excellent question! Maybe the most important one. And I have also thought about it for very long. And it's just because of that that I bring up the problem with Christian ethics. I don't do it for fun. But it is the only answer to be found when digging deep enough.

But people just don't want to hear about it...

Afonso Henriques said...

Man, after seeing Conservative Swede's video, I followed the link given in youtube to the electionjournal.com. There, you can see this, for instance.

Is this America??? Is this the new American Dream? Because I've just seen what apears to be a country singer supporting for Obama screaming "I want my dream back"!

Sickening.

Conservative Swede said...

Thanks for the link Afonso,

And the typical wimpy, effeminate white guy reporter says "I think that's against the law [voting several times], but that's OK." (servile, somewhat nervous, smile to the camera)

aileen said...

At first I asked myself why those people were blocking access to the polls, voting more than once, voting dead people, brandishing billy clubs, etc., inasmuch as all the indications have been pointing to a big victory for Obama in an honest vote. They don't need to cheat or intimidate, so it would be in their interest to display how honestly they'll have won. But it's not a contradiction when one realizes that they are behaving as they intend to behave after the election. The thuggish behavior is not to prevent people from voting for McCain; it's to show who's boss from now on.

Conservative Swede said...

Fjordamn;
They lie and lie and then lie some more, and don't think twice about doing so.

And still the people here generally believe that the same media is telling all the truth about Russia and other things. But those news are baked in the very same oven!

As they say "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." How about "fool me a thousand times" - then shame does not quite cover it, does it? People are such suckers for media. Media can lie to them hundreds of times on one issue, and they know they have been lied to, still they take it as the highest truth what the very same lying media says on another issue.

I pity the humans.

Conservative Swede said...

Fjordamn

Oops, how did that happen? I believe a Lizard must have hacked my computer :-) Poor guy, you have already been called so many things.

Conservative Swede said...

Aileen,

But it's not a contradiction when one realizes that they are behaving as they intend to behave after the election. The thuggish behavior is not to prevent people from voting for McCain; it's to show who's boss from now on.

Excellent point!

And I would also add as an explanation: It's in their nature.

Unknown said...

Perhaps, Fjordman, but the deeper question is WHY are the media Leftists?

This article by Paul Weyrich notes a comment by one of Boris Yeltsin’s officials that the KGB’s plants in American media were still there long after the Cold War ended.

Sample quote:

"When the Soviet Union was disintegrating, President Boris Yeltsin appointed a free-market economist, Igor Gaidar, as his Premier. At that time I was a virtual commuter to Moscow so on one of those trips my close friend Arkady Murashev arranged for me to meet with Gaidar. I was confused. I had been not just in Moscow and Leningrad, now Saint Petersburg, but all over the Soviet Empire. In the American media I kept on reading about how the Russian people were starving, that ordinary household items were beyond their reach and that the streets were filled with beggars trying to sell a family heirloom for an American dollar. I saw none of this and, mind you, I was covering some of the backwater streets as I was photographing Moscow’s tramway system. So I asked Gaidar why it was that he thought free-market efforts in the Soviet Union were being trashed by American media when the reality was far different from what I was seeing.

He replied with a stinging answer, one I never will forget. He said, “Well, the Soviets spent millions of dollars infiltrating your media. Just because the Soviet Union went away doesn’t mean these people have gone away. They are still there.
"

Conservative Swede said...

Very good story Islam'o'phobe.

Anyway, the problem is not Marxism. That's an insufficient analysis. George Soros is an anti-Marxist Bernard Henry-Levy is an anti-Marxist, and these are the kind that are bringing us down. And it is exactly these people -- who see Marxism as the problem -- who pushed for invading Serbia.

We stand for something third. We have to oppose both the Marxists and these anti-Marxists, both the left and the right, all forms of internationalism. We need to identify as Kafircons, not anti-Marxists.

Unknown said...

Swede,

Soros's funding Anti-Communism is deceptive until you realise the Cold War world was one of frozen borders. When the Iron Curtain was in place there was not as much free movement.

The U.S.'s problem with illegal Mexicans was only 5 million interlopers when Ronald Reagan signed an Amnesty in 1986. A lot of West European countries did not have mass immigration problems until the 1990s.

That the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 was followed so closely by the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 makes me think the Marxist and non-Marxist internationalists may have a profound connection as Vladimir Bukovsky suggests.

Afonso Henriques said...

Conservative Swede,

"George Soros is an anti-Marxist Bernard Henry-Levy is an anti-Marxist, and these are the kind that are bringing us down."

Are those "Capitalists"? How can we name them? Will we have to do like Bela and name it "Jewery"? I think that there is even a lack of words to qualify that kind of internationalism. I just wonder what you think about Bilderberg.

"We need to identify as Kafircons, not anti-Marxists."

Or Nationalists or something of the sort. Kafirconservatism is anti and we have to stand for something. Let us not be based on hate but on love. Between, have you read the last essay from Takuan Seyko at the Brussels Journal? I think that is the way to go...

Conservative Swede said...

Afonso,

They are all internationalists, so if we are going to conceptualize what we are against to include them all, that's it. As a minimum criteria we need to be anti-internationalists / anti-universalists. Which fits fine with being a nationalist, as you mentioned. And I like the term civlizationist. We need to be something more than just nationalists.

Are those "Capitalists"? How can we name them? Will we have to do like Bela and name it "Jewery"? I think that there is even a lack of words to qualify that kind of internationalism.

Well, Soros, BHL etc. are cultural leftists, that is leftist radicals on cultural issues (multiculturalism, mass immigration, special interest groups, anti-religion etc.), but much less of economical leftists (such as the Marxists are). And it's exactly the cultural issues that are killing us, welfare statism is benevolent in comparison. However the kinds like Soros and BHL are quick to ally themselves with the socialist (Soros backs Obama). And by combining mass immigration and welfare statism the most deadly brew is created. Soros and BHL are also quick to ally themselves with the neocons (Soros support also McCain). They play the whole internationalist field. They do it easily because people are fools and believe that internationalist left and internationalist right are opposites, that Democrats and Republicans are opposite, etc. They, and their kind, get their will through (fairly easily) and the result is extreme internationalism and cultural leftism/radicalism.

Kafirconservatism is anti and we have to stand for something. Let us not be based on hate but on love.

Geez, have you been watching Oprah or what's the matter?

Anyway, what we will stand for, what we will be, will have to be recreated. The components will be found in our historical past. Then a strong leader will have to forge it. As it has always happened in history.

costin said...

usa it's Europe's last hope. I pray it remains sane at least 4 years starting tomorrow and that i'm right when i think that obama will be forgotten by January

senatortombstone said...

One of the complaints and fears of the first Americans was the presence of large standing army in times of peace. I wonder what sort of crimes Obama's civilian military police would be looking out for? Dissent?

Conservative Swede said...

OK, both Pennsylvania and Ohio projected for Obama. If we assume that the west coast goes to Obama (which we can safely assume), it's all over. It doesn't matter if McCain manages to turn-around the situation in Florida (yes Florida seems to go to Obama).

Virginia and North Carolina are very tight, but it doesn't matter now.

The only chance for McCain now is if the projection in Ohio would be wrong and he then takes all of the remaining states (still assuming all of the west coast going to Obama).

Tomorrow starts the year of the one. The first Olympiad of our new planetary chronology, aka change. Well, actually it starts in January, but it will feel like it starts tomorrow. If Obama toured the world as a celebrity president when he was merely a candidate, imagine the royal tours he will be making once he's won the election.

Conservative Swede said...

According to Drudge the popular vote is very tight. It would be sort of fun if McCain won that. To hear all the Dems explaining emphatically how how the popular vote has no relevance...

Kathy said...

There is one consolation in all of this, and that is that those who voted for Obama have chosen the agent of their destruction. Do you remember the first Ghostbusters movie, where Gozer the Gozerian told them they had to choose the agent of their destruction, and Dan Aykroyd chose the Pillsbury Doughboy because he figured it would be the "safest" thing to choose? This is what this whole election reminds me of, people choosing the agent of their own destruction. Oh, and don't worry about those thugs in Philly. No doubt they don't know we've just declared war on Syria, and in the next year Obama will have shipped their asses to Syria, or Pakistan, or Iraq, or wherever we have chosen next to spread "democracy," and no one will have to worry about them anymore.

Conservative Swede said...

Dan Aykroyd chose the Pillsbury Doughboy because he figured it would be the "safest" thing to choose? This is what this whole election reminds me of, people choosing the agent of their own destruction.

Ha ha, brilliant!

But people are just clueless (deeply in hypnosis). Obama is described as a left-centrist by the media pundits. I wonder what the Chileans thought when they elected Allende? But they were not as stupid as the Westerners of today (no not only Americans, all around the world!), Allende only got 34% of the votes.

Btw, Obama was not elected -- he was chosen. The One has been Chosen. The Child!

One Obamessiah to rule them all, one Obamessiah to find them, one Obamessiah to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them.

ɱØяñιηg$ʇðя ©™ said...

What is it the prophecies say about Anti-Christ? That he will survive a deadly wound from an assassination attempt? Well, we will find out soon, but them it will already be too late...

Conservative Swede said...

But if the Pillsbury Doughboy is assassinated he will become a martyr, and the power of Gozer the Gozerian might grow even bigger, even to immense levels.

Czechmade said...

Sorry for annoying. In late ninities I let stay for free a Russian Ukrainian art teacher from Perma (south east of Moscow) in my house. She payed teaching me Ukrainan and gave me some old Bible in Old Church Slavic, she smuggled

She dicribed the starvation in her city, people shooting the pigeons...

In early nineties I remember TV ads
on various German channels "Herz fuer Russland" - exhorting people to send food packages to Russia.

Please advice me, should I dismiss it as a propaganda or am I automatically a propaganda tool - remembring all that?

Did she lie to me and why did the Russians accept millions of packages from Germany?

Advice me, before i make some silly use of free speech again.

bruce said...

A conservative Swede! Conservative Czechs??

I just stumbled upon this reading Gateway Pundit (an American neo-con blog). I must say, I'm kind of shocked. Explain to me, how does one grow up to be a conservative in Europe? Where are the conservative intelligensia still present in Europe to spread these ideas? My impression was that European education, media and government had all embraced progressive ideals.

I'd really like to know this! Right now America has a real chance to establish a permanent progressive majority, the last thing we need is some resurgent conservative movement comming out from out where. Let alone a newly conservative Europe endangering what I hope will be a new détente with middle eastern countries.

And about Obama's national service or defense corps, you guys have it all wrong. The idea is to give people support in their mission to help one another and teach Americans the virtue of progressive ideals. I'm going to be one of the first to sign up, I'd be honored to serve in a leadership position in such an organization!

Unknown said...

Rosa sat so Martin could walk.
Martin walked so Barack could run.
Barack ran so our children could fly.

We will be the wind on the back of a Kenyan goat-headers son.

Henrik R Clausen said...

Explain to me, how does one grow up to be a conservative in Europe?

Read books. Real ones, not the cooked-over versions we get at school. Learn about history, philosophy, logic and common sense.

It's not so difficult, but too few bother. Understanding fascism - and finding it revolting as I do - helps, too.

no2liberals said...

It's gonna be a bumpy four years, and much damage will be done, but I am encouraged by history.
We survived Jimmy Carter once, and we will again.
Without something to compare it with, too many were unable to understand how good we have had it for the last twenty eight years.
Fortunately for us, the Senate isn't filibuster proof, and can block some/most of the worst legislation he attempts to pass, if they will have the strength.
If any are deluded enough to think that this poseur will be able to, or even want to, unite this divided country, they are completely mistaken. He won this election based on racial divisions and obfuscation. He was unchallenged by the adoring media on nearly aspect of his bizarre background, even his origins, and he must be bemused that he has been able to pull off this scam in plain sight.
I got your unity, B-HO, swirling down my porcelain perch.
I will extend to our new President, at least as much courtesy and respect, as the left has shown President Bush for the past eight years.

Afonso Henriques said...

"And I like the term civlizationist"

Me too.

"But if the Pillsbury Doughboy is assassinated he will become a martyr, and the power of Gozer the Gozerian might grow even bigger, even to immense levels."

Look to Che Guevara... I don't think he's a bigger danger than he is a fashion object. The JP Sartres of the world are more powerfull than any Castro, Che, Stalin or Mao.

Between, I think it would be wrong to kill Jesus now but I also have in great vallue the American saying that the Tree of Liberty must be "refreshed" with the blood of Patriots and Tyrants.

The media here is pushing for a black president here already. Damn, don't they have Sarkozy already? Is he not "foreign" enough.

Armance said...

The media here is pushing for a black president here already.

The same here: the media morons have already asked the question if we are prepared to have a gypsy president (my sides are splitting with laughter).
Which leads to another disturbing aspect of the story: enthusiastically emulating "the greatest democracy in the world", the media in various countries might promote on unprecedented scale the election of political leaders belonging to minorities. Now it's American, fashionable and cool. Like we don't have enough of a disaster already.

Afonso Henriques said...

Really Armance?

Here they went to intreview "the people" in a market of Lisbon. The questions varied. They only asked (well, the people on the market were) blacks and gyspies. Then they came to a white men who answered:

"Who I want to win? I want the nigger to win. He looks ok. He looks a reasonable men and he apears to be highly intelligent. So, that's not because he is a damned nigger that we the gypsies won't support him, I think we the gypsies could be presidents some times, it doesn't matter if you are black, white, red or blue, everybody has to be president some day."

Fancy. This was comical. But what disgusted me the most were some blacks answering "No... that would never happen here in Portugal. People are too racist here..."
Are you kidding me??