Friday, May 02, 2008

An Offense Against Multiculture

This account from Sweden was reported to me by a reader who says, “This condensed story is 100% true.” The man who was charged in the events described below is still awaiting the disposition of his case.

I have redacted the place names, and for the name of the accused I use the term “person of Swedish background”, because that is the official designation given to indigenous Swedes by their own government, as if they were merely another ethnic group in the glorious rainbow patchwork quilt that is our modern multicultural society.


An almost typical day in multicultural Dhimmistan/Sweden

Swedish MuslimaPut quite simply: a typical person of Swedish background meets a typically clothed Muslima in a cramped area. He feels provoked to say to the Muslima standing almost in front of him: “Haven’t you lost your way?” (“Har inte du gått vilse?”).

The question is obviously not understood, as it seems, so the person of Swedish background delivers the elucidation: “I mean, in such clothing shouldn’t you be in the Middle East — what are you doing in this inhospitable country (ogästvänliga land)? Travel back to Lebanon or Dubai!”

Evidently the Muslima gets upset. She consults someone on her cellphone. The person of Swedish background continues on his way.

The Muslima chases him. After some hundred meters the person of Swedish background turns his head and says: “F**k off, stop chasing me!”

Now the Muslima starts screaming at the person of Swedish background: “This will be your final evening! Just you wait, you’ll be sorry for this! Now it is finished!”
- - - - - - - - -
Suddenly two Muslim men appear and join the Muslima. All three continue to chase the person of Swedish background — who is not running, but walking as fast as he can — through a housing area for a few hundred meters, yelling at him to stop because they have called the police.

The person of Swedish background is well-informed about how the multicultural system functions, and that ethnic Swedes are never proved right against the culture-enrichers — at least is that the practice — so the police is are no option for him.

Finally the person of Swedish background arrives at an underground locked garage, which he unlocks and enters. The self-closing doors work slowly, so the Muslim trio enters after him.

The person of Swedish background demands that they leave the “private premises”, and the Muslim trio refuse — one of the men says: “We live here!”

The person of Swedish background exits the garage, with the Muslim trio still hanging after him, two or three meters behind his back. Then the person of Swedish background makes a rush for the garage, gets in and hurries through the garage some 150 meters to a locked door with the Muslim trio close upon his heels.

The person of Swedish background manages to unlock the door, to get through and finally to push with all his might to shut the door with the Muslims pressing on the other side of the door. Click, the door is locked and the pursuit is over.

The reason why the person of Swedish background couldn’t get rid of the Muslim trio, run away or anything, must be mentioned: the whole time he was accompanied by two unleashed dogs, who did not understand at all this strange behavior of their master.

The only thing the person of Swedish background had said during the chase and since he asked the Muslima to: “F**k off, don’t chase me!” was in the garage: “Get out — you have nothing to do here!”

Later — that is ten months after this episode — the person of Swedish background is picked up by an armed three-man police patrol and brought to the police headquarters, where he learns that the Muslims that same day had visited the landlord’s agent’s office to identify the person of Swedish background, he with the two small black and white dogs. Then the Muslims went to the police to report the person of Swedish background for:

(1) threatening to kill the Muslima,
(2) chasing her,
(3) cursing at her,
(4) calling her names,
(5) offending (kränkt) her sensible Muslim soul, and
(6) being the reason why she had to seek treatment for her weak heart the next day.

The Muslima demands SEK 50,000 ($8,000) in damages.

The police investigation is continuing.

This person of Swedish background would very much like to live the rest of his life in a Muslim-free place. Is there any such place on this globe?

20 comments:

eatyourbeans said...

If you haven't seen this You Tube video yet, a guy in the UK gets arrested for singing a song.

http://britishnationalism.org/forum/showthread.php?t=412

The arresting cop's accent is quite thick; perhaps one of our Brits would be willing to translate?

ScottSA said...

Both of those episodes are outrageous.

Gregory said...

He should have knocked the cell phone out of her hand and then stomped on it. If she bothered him further, he should have knocked her on her ugly ass. The swedes have lost all their backbone. As vikings they are nearly dead.

thll said...

The cop's a northerner but there's a hint of midlands in there too, similarly with the guy he arrested - my guess is derby, coventry, nottingham.

The cop said that in his opinion the guy was singing 'a racist song' and that he was arresting him for it.

Afonso Henriques said...

Well, despite the fact that the muslims lied and were not correct, I must highlight that the Sweden could have been more polite, couldn't he?

Just wondering...

Bob said...

"Well, despite the fact that the muslims lied and were not correct, I must highlight that the Sweden could have been more polite, couldn't he?

Just wondering..."
---

And how do you get rid of bullies (the swede in this case)?

You ignore them. What the muslims supposedly did is not helping their case (of course, that's the point). I'm tempted to go piss off some muslims just to see what they do and record the whole thing a la Dateline's "To catch a predator" series.


(If you haven't seen that, Dateline is a USA news show and on that series they had a girl pose as underage and invite old men to have sex with her via the internet)

Saulius said...

"Well, despite the fact that the muslims lied and were not correct, I must highlight that the Sweden could have been more polite, couldn't he?

Just wondering..."

Regarding bullying - it is correct about ignoring it as the best option.

Now consider you (if a woman) or your girlfriend being called a slut by certain folks (not very unfrequent in Scandinavic countries). Now make a thought experiment, how the (symmetric to that of article) situation would develop.

Afonso Henriques said...

Saulius,

"Now consider you (if a woman) or your girlfriend being called a slut by certain folks (not very unfrequent in Scandinavic countries)."

And do you think that this happens only in Scandinavian countries?

I have female friends (of a certain ethnicity) that had to leave some certain schools because they didn't felt safe over "certain folks".

When a minority gets a majority and the used to be majority "men" can not behave as they should because the "bullies" are too powerfull, then, if some certain "beauties" of the used to be majority are desired and seen as "the ultimate" sign of status for the used to be minority, then, some girls may be at risk.

And they don't have to be muslims, it is almost natural to happen if one takes females of a certain "ethnicity" to be more desired or "superior" to the other ones.
I believe it happens in "La Raza" majority public schools in L.A. or other schools across the United States. It is almost Universal.

If you want me Saulius, I can quote some declarations of a "kind" of immigrant girl that was forced to be in a school of "other kind" of immigrants. I remember those words as I was shoked by hear them.

Charlemagne said...

I wouldn't have been nearly so polite. I would have beat the Hell out of the two Muslim men and left them bleeding in the street. Since I am a gentleman the Muslima would have had to settle for a stern warning.
When will Europeans throw off the Marxist shackles of their oppressive government who seem little more than enablers of Islamization than protectors of the peace? Europe needs to eject the Muslim hordes or they are quite simply finished. War in one form or another, as discussed often here, is unavoidable. The Muslims will press every advantage the European dhimmi courts have seen fit to give them in the name of advancing multiculturalism. Indigenous Europeans are guilty until proven innocent and have the deck increasingly stacked higher and higher against them. This is becoming much too much like a live version of Orwell's Animal Farm.

Charlemagne said...

comment

Anonymous said...

Indigenous Europeans are guilty until proven innocent and have the deck increasingly stacked higher and higher against them.

Maybe after Bush leaves office, the enablers won't have something to prove (like "look how enlightened we are compared to you Yanks") and reality will set in, and policymakers will quietly move to reverse all these trends.

Zenster said...

the whole time he was accompanied by two unleashed dogs, who did not understand at all this strange behavior of their master.

... he with the two small black and white dogs.

[emphasis added]

This is why I own a wolf hybrid. He thinks small dogs are swell appetizers. Anyone making such a concerted effort to invade my personal space would receive an unmistakable and not-so-subtle warning from my 70 pound (34 kilo) half-size wolf. If they persisted, he would not hesitate to remove flesh as needed.

Mind you, my animal is very well-trained. On command, he will drop food that he is chewing on and even leave off chasing a cat.

Scandinavians in general all need to begin owning the very largest dogs they can afford to house. Muslims hate dogs and every effort should be made to expose them to our canine friends whenever possible. I urge anyone who does get a large dog to have it security trained so that it will properly defend its master and put a major hurt on any would-be assailant. This is but one way of making our lands Muslim-unfriendly.

Mikael said...

# Zenster,

I understand pigs also make excellent pets, though one would probably need a garden for them to oink in.

Pigs and dogs, keep the Muzzies away! (No, that didn't rime, I'm aware of that!)

Thiagan said...

03/05/08

Thiagan says:

As a Hindu from India, the Westerners should appreciate the difficulties in managing 200 million muslims amongst us for over 1000 years. We have managed them and here are a few suggestions:
> Go back to Christianity and the Church. It is a good religion and it is worth defending. Defending Christianity is better slogan than defending an abstract like freedom of speech, democracy etc.
> Throw out the socialist scoundrels from politics and the left lunatics from the academics
> Force the Conserve Party to become Christianity supporting party; it is unlikely that the Church will exert any undue influence in the government and it is a an issue that can be remedied.
> Scrap the welfare pay outs except for the aged. Welfare only encourages the unproductives and undesirables.
> Make extradition easy and it should be for the entire family; the convict will be jailed say for a period of five years but the family will be thrown out immediately on conviction
> Influence the judiciary, by fair and foul means, to give tougher decisions.
> The police force should be brainwashed against muslims and should use violent methods to control. In India the police does and people brush aside the resultant Islamic jingoism.
> The Conservative party should accept national security as the main plank
> Re-install death penalty
> Once in five years there should be riots in which thousands of muslims will be killed. Sounds barbaric; the alternative is being consumed by barbarism. In India we retaliate and it is called constructive response.
> Separate them physically in secluded areas; that is better than to permit them to live in all areas, which they will contaminate. This will be handy at the time of riots.They will never assimilate and do not attempt at it.
> Stop muslim immigration and substitute with Hindu labour; they are law abiding and will integrate admirably well. Hindus are the second richest and most highly educated minority in USA. There is a not a single case of a Hindu being profiled for wrong reasons.
> Teach the children to hate the muslims; they any way are doing the same thing.
> Follow the Hindu way of life; live life and accept death as inevitable; live for the children and for their future. Sex is only a side attraction and wealth is only incidental.
> Consign all the human rights character to Saudi Arabia, that is the place where they should practice their profession; tell them human lives are more important than human rights
> Get out of EU and preserve your right to protect your country and its culture. Earlier you had a country and culture to be proud of and now EU has converted the countries into anonymous entities
> In India we have a main stream political party for protecting the majority rights; create a similar one, since otherwise the secular fanatics will abandon the majority

VinceP1974 said...

thiagan: thanks for your comment.

As an American i like to say that for most of my life I had no real knoweldge of the history of India beyond that of the British colonial era.


Later on , after 9/11, I discovered the history of Muslim conquest in India and I felt ashamed that we don't teach this history in the United States. Since knowing about the horrors Muslims have committed against the peolpe of india i have become a vocal supporter of India to my family and friends.

Zenster said...

Thiagan: As a Hindu from India, the Westerners should appreciate the difficulties in managing 200 million muslims amongst us for over 1000 years.

As the world’s largest English-speaking democracy, there are many lessons for the West to take away from India.

Go back to Christianity and the Church. It is a good religion and it is worth defending. Defending Christianity is better slogan than defending an abstract like freedom of speech, democracy etc.

While Christianity is—by all measures—a more honorable form of worship than Islam, it is no replacement for a healthy pluralistic society. The sterile homogeneity of Islam should be sufficient example of why this is so. However less likely, a wholly Christian society is still capable of breeding up a “tyranny of the majority”, as has been seen in the past. While liberties like Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion or democracy may seem like “an abstract” to you, in reality, they are the fundamental bedrock of viable human culture.

Be assured that nowhere do these vital liberties admit the need to tolerate something so seditious and barbaric as Islam and shari’a law. It’s just that our world is far too varied in thought and belief for one religious mindset to provide all of the answers. Again, Islam has given more than adequate proof of this.

Throw out the socialist scoundrels from politics and the left lunatics from the academics

Absolutely. After winning World War II, America and the West went on to root out and penalize the perpetrators of that ghastly conflagration. After winning the Cold War, our communist enemies were allowed to fade back into the fabrics of our societies where they continue to do untold damage in their media and academic capacities.

There is also a modicum of blame that must be borne by conservative and independent forces. Only with the Internet’s advent have there arisen voices that loudly defend both liberty and free-market democratic republics. It is difficult to overstate how important it would have been for captains of industry to have stepped forward during the Vietnam War and explain why communism was so vile and a crime against humanity in general.

Force the Conserve Party to become Christianity supporting party; it is unlikely that the Church will exert any undue influence in the government and it is an issue that can be remedied.

Again, your admixture of Church and State is not entirely welcome. It is unhealthy in the extreme for any political party to identify solely with one group or faith. This tends to polarize politics—especially in a two-party system—and, unlikely as you may think it to be, can most definitely lead to inappropriate pressure being brought to bear against government. America is already trying to deal with churches being used as political pulpits and this is not healthy for our nation.

Scrap the welfare pay outs except for the aged. Welfare only encourages the unproductives and undesirables.

Eliminating a social safety net has too many negative implications for a large civilian population. Better that participation in Social Security be voluntary with those who opt out being required to provide for their own retirement. Clearly, previous incarnations of the American welfare system rewarded single-parent illegitimate children and joblessness, thus perpetuating the exact problem it was intended to cure. That need not be the case as recent reforms have shown.

Make extradition easy and it should be for the entire family; the convict will be jailed say for a period of five years but the family will be thrown out immediately on conviction

Given the plethora of ills inflicted upon society by illegal immigration, this proposal—draconian though it may be—is gaining increasing merit. As it stands, too often, illegal aliens bring with them the very worst attributes of their native lands. Seeking to surreptitiously insinuate themselves into free societies, in doing so they frequently import a culture of corruption, bribery, graft and theft typical of their home countries.

Influence the judiciary, by fair and foul means, to give tougher decisions.

WRONG! Once a judicial system is allowed to run amok it can trample the rights of all. Elimination of lifetime appointments to the bench and making elected officials sensitive to the will of the people is a much more effective way of obliging our legal system to act against threats to the common weal.

The police force should be brainwashed against muslims and should use violent methods to control. In India the police does and people brush aside the resultant Islamic jingoism.

WRONG! Why should brainwashing be necessary? Shari’a law is a massive violation of human rights and Islam is an ongoing crime against humanity. The law of all free nations should vigorously oppose any imposition or practice of such ideological filth. All that is required is to brush away the scales of moral relativism that government and liberal academia continue to blinker public opinion with. As with your “foul means”, allowing police forces an unrestrained and heavy hand only leads to unequal application of the law and corruption of the judicial system.

Muslims should not be subjected to selective law enforcement, as that is a recipe for disaster. Once police are given undue personal discretion in how to apply the legal code it opens the door for myriad abuses of power. Instead, Islam must be recognized for the violent and abusive screed that it is and subjected to forceful curtailment and abolition.

The Conservative party should accept national security as the main plank

Any political party that refuses to recognize national security as its prime directive should go the way of the dodo. To do so is nothing short of treason.

Re-install death penalty

Fortunately, here in America, we do not have that problem. Quite curiously, the EU seems to be overcoming its own scruples about the death penalty as well. Although it certainly appears as if Article 2 of Protocol No 6 to the ECHR: may not be destined for application to Muslim terrorists.

“Article 2 of Protocol No. 6 provides that a state may make provision in its law for the death penalty in respect of acts committed in times of war or of imminent threat of war.”

My guess is that Article 2 will be used to execute those who engage in civil war with Europe’s Muslims, but that’s just me.

Once in five years there should be riots in which thousands of muslims will be killed. Sounds barbaric; the alternative is being consumed by barbarism. In India we retaliate and it is called constructive response.

WRONG! A “constructive response” is to deport or intern Muslims in order to humanely repatriate them to their respective Islamic utopias. In India’s case, she will probably have to lead the way by simply banning Islam altogether and deporting those who refuse to observe that ban or imprison them.

Make no mistake about it. Islam is destined for history’s scrap heap. It is wholly incompatible with modern civilization and possesses absolutely no redeeming features. For those reasons, there is simply no cause for other cultures to tolerate this violent and misogynistic philosophical dungheap.

Separate them physically in secluded areas; that is better than to permit them to live in all areas, which they will contaminate. This will be handy at the time of riots. They will never assimilate and do not attempt at it.

Such separation in the form of internment may well prove necessary for a country like India with its large indigenous Muslim population. Isolation in ghettoes is likely to be much less successful as their borders would become war zones.

Stop muslim immigration and substitute with Hindu labour; they are law abiding and will integrate admirably well. Hindus are the second richest and most highly educated minority in USA. There is a not a single case of a Hindu being profiled for wrong reasons.

Without going into any details or disagreements with respect to how America needs to curtail ALL immigration for a “recovery” period, I’ll agree that Hindus make far better citizens.

Teach the children to hate the muslims; they any way are doing the same thing.

“Hate the sin and the sinner?” While not a Christian, I’d still rather see the sin hated more. Muslims must be given some sort of chance to abandon Islam. Just not on the West’s time and dime. They can return to the MME (Muslim Middle East) and begin reconstructing it into a peaceful Christian, Hindu or Buddhist utopia—I care not which—just so long as Islam is eradicated.

Follow the Hindu way of life; live life and accept death as inevitable; live for the children and for their future. Sex is only a side attraction and wealth is only incidental.

So, what happened to the Christian way of life? You still seem to suffer from a bias towards religious governance versus a democracy’s constitutional rule of law.

Consign all the human rights character to Saudi Arabia, that is the place where they should practice their profession; tell them human lives are more important than human rights.

I could not agree with you more. Export all of these bleeding hearts to what should be the absolute focus of their concerns. Once they have successfully spread their message of peace, love and brown rice to Islam’s core, let them ship off to Burma then, Zimbabwe, the Sudan and successive other hot spots until they succeed or perish.

Get out of EU and preserve your right to protect your country and its culture. Earlier you had a country and culture to be proud of and now EU has converted the countries into anonymous entities

The EUSSR is just that. Enough said.

In India we have a main stream political party for protecting the majority rights; create a similar one, since otherwise the secular fanatics will abandon the majority

Again, you seem a bit hazy about the dangers arising from a tyranny of the majority. It is minority rights that are more frequently in danger. I’ll ask that you consider the plight of Christians in outlying areas of India. Please do not confuse my concern for minority rights with and worries about Muslim rights. According to Islam, unbelievers have no rights, so neither should Muslims when they seek to colonize non-Islamic lands.

VinceP1974 said...

Christianity and it's respect for individual dignity and individual conscience is what created the modern secular pluralistic State.

And as the Christian roots get dissolved, you will see a breakdown of civil society because the freedom that comes with the rights that a free people have from God can only be maintained by a moral and just people.

Europe is facing a future it created by rejecting God.

jillosophy said...

Good ideas for fighting back, all of them. BUT we only need to do ONE SIMPLE THINGS: OUTLAW ISLAM IN OUR COUNTRIES.

So far they have been making the advances, but they won't get truly aggressive until we start to fight back.
It's been easy, until now. We haven't yet begun to fight.
OUTLAW ISLAM. ITS ALL WE NEED TO DO.

Anonymous said...

I´m from Odense, Denmark. And we have a case here where a family were involved in a minor traffic accident. The guy in the other car, who was driving crazy, was sure enough a young muslim immigrant. When the muslim got out of the car - furious and ready to kill someone - he planted a knife in the familyman from the other car, infront of his family + lots of witnesses. Then it happened that the police, after they arrested the young muslim, made a administrative mistake of some sort, and the charges against the muslim man had to be dropped - despite the many witnesses (who he had also tried to threat to silence). Then again, since no case was made, the "logic" of the system is that he was prissoned as a nonguilty, so now he can walk away as a free man with a giant smile on his ugly face, and further more, now he can make a demand of whatever he must desire from the man he coldblodded knifed down who is also suffering from PTSD. That is how it is like here in Europe these days...

angelica said...

We need more men like Charlmagne (Read his comments above). Real patriotic men with guts yet gentlemen also.

I was gobsmacked by the other video posted. How dare that policeman arrest that man for singing an innocent line!?? Is there not enough proper criminals committing genuine crimes like burglary, theft, assault, and murder that he has to go around like the bully he is and arrest innocent people based on his own terrified marxist pre-conceptions of what the pc-police should do. What a vicious coward. I hope he's lost his job after this. Does anyone know the constable's name as I personally feel like complaining about this. With all the genuine crime that happens in this country, the despotic pc-police set their teeth into gagging the general population on freedom of speech and innocent drunken sing-song instead. Gobsmacked.