The noted blogger Fjordman is filing this report via Gates of Vienna.
For a complete Fjordman blogography, see The Fjordman Files. There is also a multi-index listing here.
According to the news website The Local, members of the only significant (but still small) party in Sweden critical of mass immigration live under constant threat of violence. Sweden is witnessing the greatest explosion of street violence in its history, and a woman is raped every two hours. The national newspaper Aftonbladet links the massive increase in rapes to the warm weather. The state-sponsored organization Expo, which lists a dozen employees at its website and receives backing from the media and the major parties, has been campaigning against the Sweden Democrats for years. Expo’s Daniel Poohl states that it’s “not undemocratic” to deny the SD access to political influence. The writer Bruce Bawer says that “Sweden Democrats have been the targets of events that recall China’s Cultural Revolution. Staged ‘people’s protests’ by members of the ‘youth divisions’ of other parties have led to the firing of Sweden Democrats from their jobs. A few weeks ago, a junior diplomat was dismissed when it became known that he was a member of the party and had criticized his country’s immigration policy. On several occasions, thugs loyal to the ruling parties have broken up Sweden Democratic meetings and beaten up party leaders.”
The Local: Sweden Democrats under constant threat
Leaders of the far-right Sweden Democrats live under constant threat of violence, according to new report from the Swedish security service Säpo.- - - - - - - - -
Säpo reports that it receives an average of 4.5 reports per month of cases of threats made to Sweden’s district and county councillors.
The threats are systematic, often involve violence, and come from autonomous groups across Sweden. Media exposure and engagement in controversial issues often increase the incidence of threats, Säpo reports.
“This is a democratic problem as it happens that politicians leave their posts as a result of having received threats,” said Säpo analyst Johan Olsson to news agency TT.
Threats are most commonly made via email, letters and on the telephone and typically come from disgruntled citizens.
How the West Lost the Cold War
The girlfriend of a politician from the Sweden Democrats, a small party critical of mass immigration, was recently attacked at her home outside Stockholm. The young woman was found bound with duct tape in the apartment block where she lives with Martin Kinnunen, chairman of the youth wing of the SD. Three men had forced their way into the couple’s apartment and held the 19-year-old at knife point. Kinnunen tells of several threats and anonymous phone calls to the family. He blames the media for systematically portraying the SD as monsters and thus for legitimizing aggression against them, and claims that the Swedish democracy is a sham.
Antifascistisk Aktion, a group that supposedly fights against “racists,” openly brag about numerous physical attacks against persons with their full name and address published on their website. Only a week after this group harassed a Swedish judge and vandalized his house, members demonstrated alongside the Swedish police, the Swedish government and the Swedish media establishment during Pride Week, Stockholm’s annual gay celebration, in August 2007. At the very end of the Pride Parade marched a group of black-clothed and masked representatives of AFA. Adjacent to them marched a number of policemen, including members of the Swedish Gay Police organization.
[…]
According to Politikerbloggen, AFA have produced a manual about how to use violence in order to paralyze and hurt their opponents, and they encourage their members to study it closely.
The Death of Sweden
A judge who hears migration appeals had his house vandalized by left-wing extremists. Threats were sprayed on the walls, red paint was poured over the steps and an axe was left outside his home.
[…]
The group Antifascistisk Action (AFA) writes on its homepage that the attack was motivated by the situation of Iraqi asylum seekers.
[…]
AFA openly brag about numerous attacks against persons who get their full name and address published on their website. According to them, this is done in order to fight against capitalist exploitation and for a global, classless society. Their logic goes something like this: If you protest against Muslim immigration, you suffer from Islamophobia, which is almost the same as xenophobia, which is almost the same as racism. And racists are almost Fascists and Nazis, as we all know, and they shouldn’t be allowed to voice their opinions in public. Hence, if you protest against being assaulted or raped by Muslims, you are evil and need to be silenced. If a native Swede is really lucky, he or she will thus first get mugged or battered by Muslims, and then beaten up a second time by his own extreme Leftists for objecting to being beaten the first time. The state does next to nothing to prevent either.
19 comments:
AFA is indeed a group of people that could be considered fascists in it's own fascion. They use means of violence to spread their message and to force people in to hiding. Ironically- these black clad socialist shi* for brains does not realise that they in reality ideologically are on the same side as the neo- nazis. They have the same goal, the same message and the same way to spread it. They are just too stupid to understand it!
They are both supremasistic, protectionistic and plain said idiotoc ideologies, one thing they share with islam- of wich they both are ass kissing colloberatoures.
It is ironic that the teenagers involved in AFA does not understand that they are "fighting" fascism with the very same methodes that fascists uses- and with the very same goale... And they still don't get it!
Grrrrrr!
There is little less than nothing in the AFA ideology.
The whole purpose for the AFA is to do something other than sniffing glue or besides sniffing glue. What better is there than to 'protect' and 'serve' those who 'they' deem to be under 'them' in the wellfare foodchain. All in all, their whole 'political struggle' like marx said in monty python is solely generated in their warped fu**ing lalaland.
Have all Swedes' brains rotted like their disgusting putrefied fish dish Surstroming?
Sweden was always held up by the left as the first and foremost socialist paradise making it a role model but now a case study, soon to be a post-mortem.
Since Swedish socialism has always been on the leading edge, it appears that the natural history and end result of decades of socialism implemented in the most civilized way is a zombie-like state of cultural suicide, death by plunging birthrate and multicult.
The imported assassins rape the women while homegrown fascists beat those they perceive as disapproving of immigration. These thugs will happily convert and be the Taliban of the North so they can continue brutalizing while smugly moralizing.
The spindly little anti-immigration party is picked off one by one as most Swedes apparently lie curled up in their homes in fetal position waiting for orders from their new masters.
This curious Sleeping Beauty trance has seized their politicians, police, and entire media. There has not been any news of a sizeable native Swedish outflow so there is not even enough individualism left to save oneself or one's family by running away like the Dutch are doing, let alone resisting.
What a bizarre situation. Norway is following Sweden into this passive oblivion. Finland? Does it still have the gumption with which it fought off the Soviets or will it too be overcome by the Scandinavian stupor?
Denmark couldn't be more of a contrast and should have been the match that lit the way for the other Viking peoples but they are too deadened, like the frozen warriors in Lord of the Rings.
We are witnessing a truly horrifying sight - a once proud civilization opening its gates and being over-run by barbarians with utter passivity. I don't believe history has ever known its like.
Let us speak frankly. The reason the troublemaking foreigners in Sweden are a problem is not because of Islam but because they are genetically alien and thus unassimilable without radically altering the blood stock of Sweden. In others words- If the foreigners abandoned their violent thuggish and culturally-alien ways in the next generation and genuinely "assimilated", with the majority intermarrying with Swedes: Good or bad? ... When we speak about saving Europe, we are speaking about a saving peoples bound by blood, and no amount of euphemism will change that.
Pela68, how are the "neonazis" possibly on "the same side" as the antifas? They are direct opposites in terms of the important stuff (the 'National Question(s)'..). [Neonazis have some of the worst strategies and tactics, so do more harm than good, but that is another question.]
laine said...
"Have all Swedes' brains rotted like their disgusting putrefied fish dish Surstroming?"
- - - - -
laine's own more or less putrefied brain might refuse him to fully realize that the majority of human sculls irrespective of national borders are in a figurative sense filled with "surströmming". Just observe the behaviour of Muslims all over the world and the white, western response to it. Remember Einstein's alleged comparison between human stupidity and the universe. Already in antiquity even the gods were fighting stupidity in vain.
As the western doctrine is characterized by pretended decency, love, the other cheek, pathological feelings of goodness, of guilt and shame (slavery, and, and...) etc while on the other hand the muslim doctrine is distinguished by a religious and so called sacred decree of world conquest, delusions of grandeur, however, totally unjustified, and in its unchanging koranic dogma represents human stupidity 1400 years out of date, the tragic outcome of the ongoing struggle will in the end be a muslim thriumph.
During the period of 2050-2150 most probabely an all islamized Europe will be an accomplished fact. Not an iota will it help that admirable people like Baron Bodissey, lady Dymphna, Ali Sina, Robert Spencer, Hugh Fitzgerald, Fjordman and thousands of other meritorious people are propagating for reasons's and rationality's victory over the false doctrine of Islam.
Practical action is also needed, not solely discussions and argumentations; a modern Jan III Sobieski is needed, robustness against muslims is needed - kick out the doctrine of 'freedom of religion': muslimism has no domiciliary rights in christian/secular countries. No concessions to muslims, no appeasement - assimilate or get the hell out of here NOW, must become the message of today, not of tomorrow. Will it? You guess!
I think it is a fair question to ask, if race is not the issue, it is just these mean old muslims, which exact group of people should be imported into Europe? Out of the entire world, where should millions or hundreds of millions of non-white 'good immigrants' come from that Europe should welcome? Which race should replace Europe's race to prove we're not racist?
Or here is another question. If, overnight, half of all Europeans were replaced with a 500 tentacled bug eyed monster that nevertheless drank the same beer, sang the same songs, and approved of the same Constitution, with low crime and a strong work ethic, would this be a good thing? Would you welcome the day everyone in Europe became a 250 tentacled interspecies mongrel?
Would you be surprised that a British politician foresaw the practical downside of multiculturalism, based on his experience in India? In 1977 Rt. Hon. J. Enoch Powell, MP made a speech, The Path to National Suicide forecasting the UK's and indeed the West's current fate in a measured and scholarly tone and hence it has been conveniently forgotten. Luckily The UK's Guardian Newspaper has an on-line copy which begins:
... Throughout the last twenty years, locally at first, then nationally, one political subject has been different from all the rest in the persistence with which it has endured and the profound and absorbing preoccupation which it has increasingly held for the public. This is all the more remarkable because of the sedulous determination with which this subject has been kept, as far as possible, out of parliamentary debate, and the use which has been made of every device from legal penalty to trade union proscription to prevent the open discussion and ventilation of it. No social or political penalty, no threat of private ostracism or public violence, has been spared against those who have nevertheless continued to describe what hundreds of thousands of their fellow citizens daily saw and experienced and to voice the fears for the future by which those fellow citizens were haunted. The efforts that were made during the 1930s to silence, ridicule, or denounce those who warned of the coming war with the fascist dictatorships and who called for the peril to be recognized and met before too late, provide but a pale and imperfect precedent.
In all this suppression more than one powerful motive can be seen at work. On the one hand there is the primitive but widespread superstition that if danger is not mentioned, it will go away, or even that it is created by being identified and can therefore be destroyed again by being left in silence. Akin to this is the natural resentment of ordinary people, but especially of politicians, at being forced to face an appalling prospect with no readily procurable happy ending. The custom of killing messengers who bring bad news is not confined to the kings and tyrants of antiquity or of fiction. On the other hand there are at work the dark motives of those who desire the catastrophic outcome which they foresee. All round the world in various forms the same formula for rending societies apart is being prepared and applied, by ignorance or design, and there are those who are determined to see to it that Britain shall no longer be able to escape. I marvel sometimes that people should be so innocently blind to this nihilism. ...
Protestant:
They are both groups promoting isolationism, they are anti market echonomy. The goals of both groups are totalitaric states. Both groups are anti- American and they both hate Jews. Violence is a trade mark of both of the groups...
Should I continue?
"In"'s personal insult to me seems gratuitous as there is nothing in his comment that refutes mine nor that I would disagree with except the state of my brain.
"In" seems to have a very low opinion of humanity in general.
My hypothesis was that it is socialism that rots people's brains in the West and the poster country of socialism, Sweden is the first to show the ill effects. I would think that everything I've ever written on this site demonstrates that I believe Islam to be another system that serves humanity ill.
What is there in the above that brings the state of my own brain into question?
laine said...
"What is there in the above that brings the state of my own brain into question?"
- - - - -
Perhaps your high and mighty assumption full of implicit faith that ONLY Swedish sculls contain "surströmming" -- my well-founded opinion of general human stupidity does not need this time either to note an exception to the universal thesis. Pomposity rules forever.
Pela68: The similarities are notable and interesting, but you seem to be saying that economics matters above all else..
To my mind, only one thing matters at the end of the day- The National Question(s). When remembering historical events, no one remembers whether a particular king was more economically liberal or more statist. They solely remember developments relatign to the National Character of their country or broader civilization. No one cares what Sobieski's opinion of economics was. No one cares whether Charles Martel ruled in totalitarian manner. See what I mean?
Antifas favor giving our lands away to alien people and attacking nationalists; nationalists (including of the crude neonazi variety) favor chasing both the foreign colonists and the antifa-nihilists out of town, or worse. They are OPPOSITES in this way.
Someone who opposes antifas and nationalists equally forcefully is, at the end of the day, a social-democrat or market-liberal...the same people who got us into this mess.
Diamed wrote:
"I think it is a fair question to ask, if race is not the issue, it is just these mean old muslims, which exact group of people should be imported into Europe? Out of the entire world, where should millions or hundreds of millions of non-white 'good immigrants' come from that Europe should welcome? Which race should replace Europe's race to prove we're not racist?"
Great point. Really excellent. If we could replace all the dark-skinned Muslims in Europe with even darker skinned christians who worked hard and caused no crime and no problems and assimilated in perfectly [the definition of full assimilation is free intermarriage], in theory that should solve the problem being raised by this and other sites 100%. Except, our great-grandchildren would look nothing like our ancestors; i.e., the blood-stock of our nation(s) has been annihilated. Hmm...
No one has been able to explain why the following inconsistency has been able to gain ground:
Asia is for Asians.
Africa is for blacks.
South and Central America are for Hispanics.
Arabic/Muslim countries are for Arabs/Muslims
(all with immigration policies and law systems to keep them that way, all racist by definition)
Europe, Australia and North America are for everybody.
There can be no continent, country or even region left for white Europeans anywhere in the world because that would be the only racism that is intolerable.
Corollary: Cultural genocide of any non-white group is an abomination but cultural genocide of European whites is a good thing.
For those who think it's a good thing, here's a question: How likely is it that when Europe and North America are swallowed up and the third world still needs feeding the coming deficit in foreign aid is going to made up by the oil Sheiks of Araby or the warm and cuddly Chinese whose present foreign aid is selling arms?
I'm glad I won't be alive to see the world when Pax Americana ends (tottering now) but feel for my children.
Very apt title--while the public external battle was being fought and won the private internal battle was being lost.
Cultural marxism is designed to be anti-white in Europe because the majority culture is white. If they were operating in Japan they'd be anti-"yellow".
Sweden needs an organization that can physically counter these AFA people. The police won't help while the marxists control the state. The sort of people who will be willing to take those physical risks won't be very liberal usually. Catch22
Laine's comments of "3/09/2008 10:15 PM" are right on the mark. What needs to be understood is that the position written about there is the official one of US-Conservatives. Conservativism today is ultimately a corporatist movement concerned with free-markets, and opposes nationalism almost as much as the wildest antifa clown. [Think of the "LGF racism" crisis a few months back].
According to American conservatives, officially, no white population is to be allowed their own nation and to represent their own interests, and any white nation (or any nation at all) that opposes "McDonalds'ism" and thinks in ethnic/racial terms, is an enemy that should be bombed or ostracized. That's Pax Americana.
Correction to second to last sentence above- Nonwhite nations ARE allowed (and encouraged) by Pax Americana to think in ethnic/racial terms, but European nations are NOT and are obligated to bring in foreigners and "integrate" them. Thus, we can say that Pax Americana is "antiwhite", with justification.
Bert Rustle: From the 1977 speech by Rt. Hon. J. Enoch Powell, MP:
Where I part company with Mr. Fraser is that he identified what he called "discrimination" and "deprivation" as the causes of segregation and regarded measures for reducing and preventing discrimination and deprivation as calculated to prevent segregation. The opposite is the case. It is segregation that is the cause, and not the result, of discrimination and deprivation; and measures aimed at reducing discrimination and deprivation only increase segregation and enhance its destructive potential.
Please see below:
laine: No one has been able to explain why the following inconsistency has been able to gain ground:
Asia is for Asians.
Africa is for blacks.
South and Central America are for Hispanics.
Arabic/Muslim countries are for Arabs/Muslims
(all with immigration policies and law systems to keep them that way, all racist by definition)
Europe, Australia and North America are for everybody.
Dear laine, of course you must realize by now that white people settling anywhere else other than Europe or America is some form or another of, gasp!, COLONIALISM. Perish the thought that Muslims are actively engaged in the very same thing and all of us fair-skinned folk are supposed to bite our collective tongue and believe that—as Rt. Hon. J. Enoch Powell, MP quotes his erstwhile Primate of England—"the man with a colored face could be an enrichment to my life and that of my neighbors".
All well and fine except when that "man with a colored face" voluntarily engages in—if not insists upon—"segregation that is the cause, and not the result, of discrimination and deprivation". I refer you to the Bishop of Rochester, Dr. Michael Nazir-Ali’s “no-go zones”, that were the center of so much recent hue and cry.
This willing and self-inflicted apartheid that currently is so often being held up as "discrimination and deprivation" against Muslims by indigenous non-Islamic populations has become—and is nothing less than—Viscount Radcliffe's "alien wedge" for which the Rt. Hon. J. Enoch Powell, MP, in his time, faced the identical same charges of issuing; “Speech or writing [that] must be “threatening, abusive or insulting;” and it must also be speech or writing by which “having regard to all the circumstances, hatred is likely to be stirred up against any racial group in Great Britain.”
Lionheart, please take note of this and Powell’s entire speech. Especially where Powell states—rather early on—that:
One of the ordinary weapons for the suppression of free speech and of frank expression of opinion is to allege that those who warn of a danger, be they right or wrong, actually desire that danger; that those who warn of war desire war; that those who warn of the materials of hatred and conflict being heaped up desire to see hatred and conflict come about. This is why Churchill was denounced as a warmonger. Because he did not fear to envisage and express the possibility and even probability of war, he could be accused of wanting it.
The fallacy is obvious; for the interest of those who desire calamity would obviously lie in keeping silent till it comes, instead of crying out for means and measures to avert it. But the fallacy is nonetheless dangerous for that.
I fear that Pat Condell awaits a similar fate but that is another matter entirely.
Yet again: Thank you Dymphna and Baron for this wonderful site.
I'm not so sure Condell will suffer the same fate. The internet is a powerful vehicle for truth.
It's simple...do you love your country or your lifestyle? If things are more important to you than maintaining your cultural heritage, keep importing immigrants to do the work your forefathers did themselves.
Who do you want doing the work of your country, muslims or Scandanavians? Either have more babies and make do with less, perhaps even move back to the countryside and back to farms to grow more of your sustenance, or lose your country to people who will alter it forever.
You'll soon be wearing burkas and getting clitoridectomies if you don't act fast! You must send them all home. You must vote out the socialists and liberals. And you must get over your political correctness. How many more of your girls must be raped by muslims who hate you all, before you say, NO MORE!
Post a Comment