As I have said before, these discrimination lawsuits are part of a systematic and continuous process of low-grade jihad that is going on across the entire West. In the aggregate, they are much more serious than bombings and other violent jihad attacks.
They are not only lucrative for the plaintiffs, they provide a way for Islamic radicals to demoralize the businesses and governments of the West, and to further weaken societies that are already reeling from the combined effects over several decades of socialism, postmodernism, multiculturalism, and political correctness.
Here’s what LN had to say:
I realize that I perhaps was not detailed enough in my description of the specific Swedish situation - which, according to the DO [Discrimination Ombudsman], is that “discrimination shall cost”. From the “customer’s” side, that discrimination is a very good business concept.- - - - - - - - - -
Any infringement that can be linked to (1) ethnic or (2) religious discrimination is worth money. In common legal cases, a person who is suing somebody for damages must be able to prove that an infringement or something similar has occurred. This, however, is not the case with the “law of discrimination”, since the plaintiffs enjoy evidence relief — and free legal assistance. The infringed person needs thereby only to point out “circumstances” that give reason to assume that discrimination has occurred.
For example, a recent case that the DO is examining is about a Muslim women of Somalian origin who was taking part in a “self-defense” course at a training center in Gothenburg. At the fourth training occasion she was urged to take off her veil otherwise she would not be allowed to go on with the course. The women refused and reported the incident to the DO; in the end, it will probably lead to the training center having to pay the Somalian lady damages of some SEK 20,000 to 50,000 ($2,900 to $7,200). Tax-free income.
A good business concept would be, at least for a woman, to convert to Islam and start getting discriminated against.