More than forty years ago, when I was in high school, I lived in the region of England described in the following book review by Ivan Winters. In those days it was called the West Riding of Yorkshire, although the redesigners of Britain have since torn up and replaced the ancient structure of England, and it is now known as West Yorkshire or North Yorkshire, depending on the exact location.
I lived in Harrogate, which is not far north of Leeds, but might as well be on a different continent, given the intensive cultural enrichment that has enveloped Leeds, Bradford, Wakefield, Keighley, and Sheffield in the more than four decades since I used to visit those places. In the interim all the old industrial cities of the West Riding have largely been converted to Pakistani outposts, a process that was only just beginning during the mid-1960s.
The Islamic Republic of Dewsbury describes the gritty reality of recent events in that part of Yorkshire. A slightly different version of this review has appeared previously on the blog ‘Musings of a Durotrigan’.
The Islamic Republic of Dewsbury
by Danny Lockwood
The Press News Ltd. £14.95 • 2012 • 314 pages
Kindle Edition £7.20 (UK) • $9.99 (USA)
Reviewed by Ivan Winters
The Islamic Republic of Dewsbury is a very interesting book which reaches some interesting conclusions, although not necessarily the conclusions that readers of this review might expect. Two things come through immediately upon reading this book. The first is Danny Lockwood’s intimate knowledge of Dewsbury, and the second is his own personality. Whenever people or places in the area are mentioned, Danny is encyclopedic in his knowledge and often offers interesting historical background. This contributed to my good opinion of this book, as some of the people and places mentioned are also known to me.
Two obvious examples: First, his references to a local pub called the ‘West Riding’ at Dewsbury Railway Station, where I have spent many a happy hour in the West Riding drinking from their interesting range of real ales. The second is Colin Auty, who one of several people mentioned in the book who known to me, and also well-known to political activists in West Yorkshire.
Danny makes clear from the very start of his book his personal affection for Dewsbury and his two great loves, Rugby League and Journalism (yes, I have got them right, Rugby League comes first!).
Danny began his career as a trainee reporter at The Dewsbury Reporter, moved to other parts of the country to work on other titles, and then returned to Dewsbury as editor-in-chief of the Reporter. Since then he has set up his own newspaper, The Free Press (Dewsbury) along with some Rugby League titles.
When I was dealing with political activists in the Dewsbury area, the comment was regularly made to me by persons such as Colin Auty, David Exley etc. that ‘we always get fair coverage with the Free Press’.
His book has the staccato writing style of short sentences that marks a journalist-turned=author. I seem to remember a claim that journalists at The Sun were trained to get their point across in eleven words or less. Presumably journalists working for The Sun on Sunday have a shorter word limit, as many of their readers will still be hung over from Saturday night!
Some of the chapters in The Islamic Republic of Dewsbury are self-contained. Other chapters in the book have a narrative running through them, and some link to events in later chapters. Two examples of the latter are references in early chapters to a court case described in detail in a later chapter where S Malik (at the time, the Dewsbury Labour MP) sued The Press for libel (the jury could not agree a verdict in this case and the two then settled out of court), and Danny’s regular references to Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, who of course is from the Dewsbury area[1].
A couple of the early chapters give some interesting history of the area, and refer to local persons who have become nationally known. There is a typo in this listing on page 66: Danny refers to such well-known figures from Dewsbury as Eddie (‘oop and under’) Waring and Mike Stephenson (‘Stevo’), both Rugby League commentators; in politics he refers to Baroness Betty Boothroyd, the first female speaker in the House of Commons and, er, ‘former Labour politician Sir Marcus Fox MP’. He had better not tell the good Tories of Shipley who elected Sir Marcus as their MP for 25 years — he ended up as Chairman of the backbench 1922 committee.
I referred above to some interesting conclusions this book comes to, and the most important one that runs through it is that everything in Dewsbury is not a case of ‘White good, Paki bad’ like some sort of West Yorkshire version of Animal Farm. Danny strongly makes the point that, yes, there are persons in the Asian community who are venal, criminal, or both, although of course there are also persons in the non Asian community to which those words could be applied. In fact he names some of the venal/criminal Asians, but he also names Asian community leaders — including some Asian Councillors — who have at various times spoken out about the fractures between the two communities, who is behind it and what should be done.
And the real point is that Danny identifies ‘who is behind it’, as did some of those Asian leaders who spoke out, and writes about in forensic detail. Yes, there are some Asian leaders who are part of the problem — after all the Markazi Mosque and Shahid Malik MP do not get nice write-ups from Danny — but the biggest part of the problem identified by him is the ‘professionals’ in the ‘race relations industry’. It is in the race relations industry’s interest that there be ‘race relations problems’ for them to have to sort out. After all, if there were no such problems then the ‘professionals’ would be out of work, and, sure as hell, turkeys do not vote for Christmas.
As co-defendants on Danny’s charge-sheet you can add the local Council, Kirklees MDC and the local police force, the West Riding Constabulary. Living in Bradford I am well aware of the ‘institutional incompetence’ of the West Riding force[2].
In his descriptions, the vast majority of Muslims in Dewsbury are hard-working people who just want to get on with their lives, and he has a similar description of the non-Muslim community. As one of his examples of Asian leaders who have spoken out about the problems between the communities and identified who is behind them, he mentions (page 155-156) Tory Cllrs Khizar Iqbal and Imtiaz Ameen. Cllr Iqbal spoke out at a Council meeting in 2003 about the ‘absurd political correctness, this fear of addressing the tough issues of the day.’ Among other issues referred to in Cllr Iqbal’s speech was the issue of ‘second-language assistants in classrooms (they wanted English-only spoken)’. The result was a standing ovation from members of all parties. As Danny comments ‘The vested interests of the race industry… were never going to be diverted… so casually’ and so it has proved despite the fine rhetoric. Note in that quote he refers to ‘race industry’ not ‘race relations’; his phrase sets out the agenda of that industry much more accurately than the normal wording!
Another example Danny quotes is the case of Lee Massey (page 246 onwards). The incident in which Lee Massey was nearly killed (his wife was asked three times by doctors if they could turn off his life support machine) started with greed by Kirklees Council! The Council agreed, in return for a substantial payment from the Home Office to provide housing for Iraqi Kurds, ‘refugees’ from Saddam Hussein’s regime. Yes, other councils in England have provided similar housing for ‘refugees’ but the Council must have been well aware of the very volatile racial situation in Dewsbury. The Kurds were put into Islamic areas such as Ravensthorpe and Savile Town, among Muslim populations many of whom regarded Saddam as a hero and the ‘Western powers’ offering sanctuary to the Kurds as ‘Satans’. The Kurds are described by Danny as ‘dissolute, non-English speaking’ (page 250-251) and soon were in conflict with the local Muslim community[3]. In the Lee Massey case a gang of up to twenty of them attacked a group of drinkers at the Royal Hotel Ravensthorpe. When other drinkers came out of the pub the Kurds ran away. Two of the Kurds then jumped into a car, a Honda Civic, and drove it at the drinkers, hitting Lee Massey.
Why have I particularly mentioned the Lee Massey case? As Danny Lockwood goes on to write (page 255) ‘Suddenly there were detectives and coppers and patrols all over Ravensthorpe… most of the Kurds had abandoned ship… to stay with “cousins” and friends across the country.’… ‘The community of Ravensthorpe, British white and Muslim together, suddenly found a common cause and a united front.’… ‘They marched together from Ravensthorpe to Dewsbury town hall to protest against Kirklees Council’s policy of housing migrants and illegals and creating such a combustible mix. For the most part they were making a decent fist of living alongside each other; the last thing they needed was another incendiary ingredient being poured into an already unstable mix.’
I have given above two examples out of the many vignettes that Danny writes about with great accuracy and detail in his book. The book is not a history of ‘How those nasty Muzzies wrecked my beautiful home town’. It is more a fascinating insight by a local journalist who on occasions had serious pressure put on him to change his reporting of events, an insight into how a mixture of civic authorities, race relations ‘professionals’, media, police and politicians failed in their public responsibilities. He is particularly scathing and forensic in his details about how local politicians of all parties and ethnic origins used, abused and then betrayed local communities for political gain. Anyone, particularly from the ‘mill towns’ of the North reading this excellent book could easily cut out the various names involved in various incidents and insert the names of persons from their local community — that is how relevant this insight is!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Notes:
| 1. | For non-UK readers I must explain that Baroness Sayeeda Warsi is an educated Asian woman (she is trained as a solicitor) from an upwardly mobile Asian family. Her father, as she boasts, ‘was an uneducated mill worker from Rochdale’; her family now run a business making beds and divans in the former wool mills of the Dewsbury/Batley area. She decided to make her name and fortune getting into politics in the Leeds and Dewsbury area. Danny quotes her admission that it was a ‘toss up’ whether she hitched herself to the Tories or to New Labour — she apparently made the decision while sitting in the hairdresser’s! Cameron made her part of his shadow ministerial team with special responsibility for ‘community cohesion’. To permit her to be a shadow minister when she was not an elected MP, he had her awarded a life peerage at the age of 36. In his first Cabinet he made her a Co-Chairman of the Tory Party. In 2012 she was appointed a senior Minister at the Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO). Danny admits that she used him (and other local journalists) as part of her career and also in a family matter. |
| 2. | Since this review was written it has been announced that Sir Norman Bettisson, Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, is to retire in March. His retirement follows the publication of the New Hillsborough Enquiry into the deaths of 96 Liverpool supporters at the Hillsborough Stadium Sheffield over 20 years ago. The enquiry found that there had been a systemic failure by the police on the day of the Hillsborough tragedy, and that middle-ranking and senior police officers had colluded to cover this up and blame the dead Liverpool supporters. Sir Norman has been accused of being a part of this cover-up, which is now being investigated by an independent police team. |
| 3. | Danny Lockwood does not get the detail of the ethnic rivalry and hatred between Kurds and other Muslim groups. He assumes simplistically that it is simply that ‘Sunni-Shia… trump Muslim-Christian every time in the hate and violence game,’ (page 251). Er, no, a bit of simple research (I used Wikipedia) shows that Iraqi Kurds are predominantly Sunni the same as the majority of the local Pakistani population. The simple fact is it has nothing to do with religious sects. Kurds are loathed by their fellow ‘Muslim brothers in peace’ and this applies to Turkish Kurds, Syrian Kurds and Iraqi Kurds. Iran is a special case, as the majority of Iranians are Shia and the Iranian Kurds are a mixture of Shia and Sunni — I could almost feel sorry for the Iranian Ayatollahs! |
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Islamic Republic of Dewsbury : (ISBN) 978-0-9570964-0-0 . Paperback 8 ¼ x 6 314 Pages. Printed by The Press News Ltd. £14.95 Available from Amazon etc. If you want to buy direct from the publisher or to buy multiple copies to sell at events/meetings etc please e-mail sales@thepressnews.co.uk (mention ‘Ivan Winters’ in any e-mail)
8 comments:
"In his descriptions, the vast majority of Muslims in Dewsbury are hard-working people who just want to get on with their lives, and he has a similar description of the non-Muslim community."
Well, the above claim is a FALSE PC MC conclusion if ever there were one.
To wit:
1. Are the MAJORITY of Muslims REALLY hard-working people - OR immigration/welfare benefits recipients and/or very violent criminals?
2. Does the British immigrant Muslim version of 'just getting on with their lives' include forced clitorectomies of young girls, forced marriage of young teen girls, forced marriage of young teen girls to much older foreign cousins so that said cousins may immigrate to Britain, marriage to multiple wives who stay as single 'sisters' with children in the same house and receive welfare benefits, acceptance of beating of women and children, lobbying for Sharia Law and Sharia Courts, etc.?
The false ideas that 'Muslims are just like everyone else' or 'Muslims act like everyone else' - take your pick - ring quite hollow as British Muslim pedophile gangs rape and prostitute indigenous British girls, teens, and women.
If Brits pretend that Muslims may take their place with the same moral results, then Brits will find themselves replaced by Muslim immigrants - Muslims who will show the true face of Islam when in the majority. Brits will be just like Copts - unable to be Christians in their own homeland due to constant violent persecution from Muslims!
Egghead
I went to school in the West Riding
until the early 1970s and even then
the few Pakistanis encountered were
hated by the locals. The cross-racial
grooming and pimping probably started
back then.
This could be the story of local socio-political corruption and machinations accross most of the U.K.
Multikulti intercomunal finger pointing as useless as reading a billboard with a microscope.
"In his descriptions, the vast majority of Muslims in Dewsbury are hard-working people who just want to get on with their lives, and he has a similar description of the non-Muslim community."
The "non-Muslim community" is that not the language of dhmmitude or do I need some sensitivity training in this very British post-multikulti epoch of "we're all in this together" - good muslim v. bad muslim and good dhimmi v. bad dhimmi.
Jolie Rouge
There is an implicit assumption amongst almost all journalists (Mr. Lockwood included) that all European nations have some kind of moral duty to continue European immigration and integrate everyone into a racially diverse melting pot.
Yet there are no melting pots in Africa or Asia. Not even one African or Asian country has handed out so much citizenship that its own population is, or will soon become, a racial minority.
In my view, journalists and academics simply assume that White countries, and only White countries, have a duty to become melting pots. But why should they?
Some Chinese and Pakistanis may make good neighbours, but this still doesn't jjustify opening your borders and handing out citizenship until immigrants start to outnumber and overwhelm the native population.
No Asian, African or non-White country has every undertaken to make its own people a racial minority. Yet all European nations are expected to... and that's just unacceptable.
Mr Lockwood may make some interesting observations, but all too many people are scared to death of making the most obvious ones.
I've read Mr Lockwood's book. I'm familiar with the area under discussion. The problem once upon a time maybe was the race industry zealots - but it has advanced way beyond that now. For even if the pc crowd were to miraculously disappear Dewsbury, the West Riding, Yorkshire, England, Britain, Europe, and the rest of the White World will still be saddled with aggressive,corrupt criminal, Muslims.
Of course there are aggressive, corrupt, criminal, """non-Muslims""" (sic) amongst us - but they are our problem whereas similarly inclined Muslims residing here ought not to be our problem. Mr Lockwood's pc equivalence betrays his predicament.
For like many individuals who still have one foot remaining in the pc equality world, Mr Lockwood is trying to square the circle.
Well done to Vale of Ignorance for stating the obvious. This is the thing that, as he implies, nobody dares say openly because we have been so browbeaten and manipulated into accepting our own genocide.
Europeans were the powerhouse of the world and when they go down the lights will go out all over.
Without Europeans, the most advanced civilisation would probably have been China, still in the Middle Ages just over a hundred years ago.
After the American election a British newspaper had an article entitled The Death of White America. You could say the same of Britain and most countries in Western Europe and the Old Commonwealth. Only Russia and Eastern Europe seem to be swimming against the tide.
The answer is I suppose, European imperial guilt and they have used it to silence us as guilt can be very corrosive; but who will benefit from the slow genocide of Europeans? As I keep saying, remove the most progressive and inventive race the world has ever known and what are you left with?
The orientals who lack our inventive capacity and South Asians and Africans whose average IQ is about 20 points below that of Europeans, Japanese and Chinese. But to say this is heresy.
And as regards slavery, form Ancient Greece and Rome right through until the late Middle Ages European society was based on slavery so all of us here in Europe and Europeans in North America probably have ancestors who were slaves.
If Europeans go then the world is finished. Civilisation will go backwards. This needs to be said very soon before it is too late. But as long as the term white supremacism is thrown at Europeans they continue to dither.
Nobody in Europe ever voted for multi-culturalisation or multi-ethnicisation. It has no democratic mandate and has been imposed either by those who wished to punish Europeans for the sins of their fathers or by those who failed to grasp that the third world is such for a very good reason.
Well said Anon!
What could convince so many politicians to betray their own people?
What could convince so many politicians to betray their own people? I was hoping for an answer.
I can't even blame the post-War European generation who have had life so easy that they lack the strength to fight a third world which has them in their sights.
Most of the decisions that have shaped the current situation were taken by those who had lived through and fought in the War. Why couldn't they predict the ultimate outcome of their policies?
In Britain, the one who could, one of the most brilliant but perhaps merely logical and altruistic personalities of post-War politics here, was Enoch Powell.
He had a brilliant war record, had seen the destruction caused by World War Two in Europe, so why did he swim against the tide?
Perhaps because rather than engaging in a knee-jerk reaction like the rest of them and put it all down to European imperialism and nationalism, he sat down and looked way into the future, beyond his own lifetime even and knew that it would all end in tears for Europeans and their civilisation.
Post a Comment