Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Muh... Muh... Members of a Monotheistic Religion

Most readers will have seen these clips, or portions of them, at one time or another, but it’s useful to have them collected together in one video. Watch the excruciating contortions of various Obama administration officials as they struggle mightily to avoid saying (or making any reference) to Islam while discussing “violent extremism” when questioned by congressional committees. At the end is a little extra fillip about Muslims, courtesy of NASA.

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video collage:


The issue of Mohamed Elbiary and the Muslim Brotherhood was not new to me, although I hadn’t seen the footage of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano being questioned by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX).

For a detailed article about the Elbiary issue, see this World Net Daily article from last fall.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

The title of this post is a reference to a classic sketch by the comedian Will Franken, which is what Vlad’s compilation reminded me of. The relevant sequence begins at about 0:53 in this (WARNING: much of the rest of this clip is offensive to Christians, Jews, gay people, straight people, and just about anyone else on the planet) YouTube video.

4 comments:

mzungu said...

I'm so proud of these Representatives asking the questions that make the elites squirm. It gives me hope. I remember the Watergate hearings. This reminded me of that. Napolitano is an especially incompetent but arrogant personage. One day her smirk is going to be gone.

Anonymous said...

It's exactly the same in the UK - anything to avoid the 'M'and 'I' words. And my guess is that it's also just the same on the European continent, and Oz too. Why is this the case and who is coordinating it - for surely it must be being coordinated.

Anonymous said...

Not exactly Winston Churchill, eh? What is the world coming to?

Graham Dawson (Archonix) said...

Anon, there's no need to assume massive coordination. Our "leaders" are herd animals who live in a very small bubble, completely isolated from reality. They are the ultimate echo chamber - repeating the same vapid meaningless ideas back and forth and patting each other on the back.

These self-appointed leaders of men are vain creatures ruled by fleetingly fashionable definitions of "acceptable behaviour", quick to turn on anyone who steps outside their particular definition of "tolerance", like the most rabid of highschool cliques. If you perceive coordination it's more likely to be the result of wanting to avoid awkward conversations at the next dinner party.