Tuesday, June 30, 2009

The Jackal Manifesto

Hells Angels DenmarkIn the past I’ve been criticized for posting translated articles about the Danish chapter of Hells Angels. My reports of what’s happening in Denmark have been construed as support for Hells Angels — especially my assertion that the motorcycle gang is doing what virtually no other organized group in Denmark is willing to do, namely stand up vigorously against the systematic violence of immigrant gangs against ethnic Danish people.

As I have said before, these accounts are descriptive, and not normative. Regardless of whom I support or what I think should be done, this is what is actually happening. The government, the police, and the security services have failed the Danish people, but nature abhors a vacuum, and motorcycle outlaws are riding in to fill the gap.

Two years ago El Inglés wrote a piece of speculative fiction about the Danish Civil War, in which he predicted the emergence of a militia recruited from ordinary Danes to resist the increasing violence of immigrants in Danish society. With the reality unfolding before us now, it appears that the focus of resistance is in fact going to start with groups like Hells Angels, who are willing to meet violence with violence.

It’s unfortunate that things have come to this pass: the civil authorities are unable to assure ordinary citizens of their safety, so alternative means of doing the same job are being devised.

Earlier today I posted TB’s translation of an article about the “Jackal Manifesto” by the Hells Angels. Henrik Ræder Clausen has kindly translated the entire document from the HA website. As Henrik noted, it’s a much more honest and lucid account of the current situation in Denmark than can be found in any of the mainstream media.


The Jackal Manifesto 2008

We use the word “jackal” about those we despise for good reason. A term that fits well in this context, and, seen from the true character of the animal, is well chosen. Jackals are easy to recognize from their stupid attitudes and cowardly patterns of conduct. Using this term for them is not based on prejudice or narrow-minded unwillingness to understand their “difficult circumstances”. Instead it is a term chosen after extensive consideration based on countless experiences and a life among them. From when there were just a few of them until today, when they are numerous enough to gather in groups. The Jackal Manifesto is not to be considered a derision of people with a certain tone of skin or a particular religion, nor is it a derision of the animal whose name is being used. Some self-righteous individuals will probably think of it in that way — peace be upon them, and then leave the victimization to them. No, the Manifesto is to be thought of as a usable tool for understanding those individuals who through threats, terror and violence hold innocent Danes, children, young and older, of all races and both genders, in an iron grip of fear. Last, but not least, this term should be used to counter the spiritual depravity of racism.

This manifesto is created with no use of propaganda from police, politicians or media. The manifesto is based on facts — actual events and a long period of experiences with the aforementioned jackals. It is about understanding and defining the kind of people we’re dealing with. Using the term “perkere” [a Danish derogative mixing “Persians” and “Turks”] about these two-legged jackals would be misleading and excessively broad. “Perker” is a stigmatizing racist expression, quite like the use of the term “rocker” [Danish derogative for biker] has become in relation to bikers. Just as the word “rocker” has been associated with “crime”, it is now also associated with “alien” and has become a good example of how negative terms are being misused to amplify people’s fear and hatred, for no good reason. No one with even an inkling of common sense should despise or stalk innocent, decent people just because they are different, have a different colour or culture, or simply due to it being in fashion! Doing so would eventually cause them to drag themselves down to the stage where precisely the jackals find their mental luggage, and where they belong.

Jackals are mainly found among people of Arab origin. Stating otherwise would be a mistake. Other nationalities are represented as well, and even dumb Danish boys. Members of the so-called immigrant gangs are not necessarily jackals. In case doubt exists as to who they are, where they come from and what they contain, we here find an excellent profile of the jackal:
- - - - - - - - -
Alone and unarmed, they are largely harmless to ordinary adults. In these situations they usually behave in a friendly manner, cringing or unpleasantly smirking. When one knows their attitudes and what they contain, and is clear about what they will say about you behind your back, they seen largely pathetic.

In groups of three or more they change character, become arrogant and courageous. In these groups they attack without reason or warning, targeting young and old alike.

They hate Danes; the mentality, the way of life, Christianity and its symbols. They frequently state “racism” as the main reason for their hatred, but they do not see the “splinter” in their own eye and believe that racism can only be white against black. They consider Denmark a country of whores, and the more harm they can inflict on the citizens of the country, the better they feel.

They terrorize children and the young to an extent rarely seen in this country. So grossly and massively that it gives a wholly new meaning to the term “bullying”, and it harms everyone — also those “New Danes” who in the eyes of the jackals are too integrated and thus traitors to their feeling of “statelessness” and “we are always right” mentality that their upbringing and twisted brains have created. Many jackals claim to be victims of a war, are children of wars, or boast of having been in war, but their “wars” are far from the Denmark that has provided every one of them a chance. That they do not go back or away to their “wars”, rather than create them here, is due to the fact that their parents fled wars, they themselves fled wars, or because they have never been close to a war!

They have no respect for courtesy or polite behaviour, unless it comes from their fathers, their older uncles or imams. Polite and friendly individuals are seen as easy victims, cowardly and fearsome, and they are immediately smeared when out of earshot.

They have no natural respect for the elderly — apart from the persons mentioned above. They see nothing wrong in bothering or terrorizing them, or even committing violence against them.

Before the legal changes about permit of residence and Danish citizenship they thought it was ridiculous to apply for Danish citizenship, in case they had not received it automatically or were born in the “country of whores”. It was enough to be here, enjoy the goods, and behave like crap.

In spite of the fact of almost all of them being born and raised in Denmark, they use a losers tongue with an assumed strong accent. This manner of speaking is adopted because they hate everything Danish, including the language, and because they are impressed by the language spoken by the black in the ghettos of the U.S. They want to make clear that they are outside society and are gangstas. In this manner they identify with each other and the genuine racism that the blacks have been subject to. They assume the role of the victim, which is central to their worldview.

They all have an oppressive mentality towards women, which they barely keep in check when looking for a date or on foreign turf. This mentality probably stems from an upbringing where they already at the age of 6-7 were given the right to decide over their mother and older sisters.

They harbour contempt for Danish women, their independence and their liberty, unless they do what they are told to, go along with them, or convert to Islam. If they do not, they are immediately considered to be whores, with no hint of irony! This is frequently expressed in random encounters in the street, in discotheques, in context of gang rapes, when their girlfriends intend to break up with them, or in any dealings with ex-girlfriends in general.

If they form the opinion that their own sisters, female cousins, mothers, or even ex-girlfriends are dressed incorrectly, too often in town, enjoy alcohol, or talk too frequently to infidels, they apply pressure on them. If the women then do not toe the line, they risk expulsion,, threats, violence or worse.

If anyone dares to refer to, compliment or joke about “their” women, it is never thought of as funny or friendly, but as an assault on the so-called “honour” of the jackals.

If they face resistance in discussion or risk a beating in some situation, they immediately fall to the ground, howling and whining like genuine jackals.

If they are beaten, they howl and scream, and immediately look to their own kin, pretending to have won the fight. Only when they end up in the intensive care ward, or if their visible damages are too extensive, do they admit to having been licked. In these cases they always claim that they were faced by many and had been assaulted!

If they are out in sufficient numbers, they have no tolerance of anyone looking at them, at the girls in their company, into their cars or simply in their general direction. In case they are alone or outnumbered, they stare into the ground or away, probably ashamed due to them knowing their true worth.

They systematically behave aggressively in traffic, and will, in case of random accidents, call in reinforcements from more jackals, intimidate the other parties into taking the blame, or even assault them. Even rescue staff, who should be sacrosanct in the situation, are at risk of being assaulted in their common excitement

They start forming groups from the age of 10-12, but most pull out of trouble and life as a jackal at the age of 25, when they get married and have children. Surprisingly, they then seem to assume that all past misdeeds are instantly forgiven.

They do not necessarily belong to a gang. Many of them are on their own or just a few along in daily life, but as soon as they are assembled in sufficient numbers, they feel on top of things and then the jackal mentality asserts itself in full.

A clear indication of a jackal feeling insecure and thus not having the courage to fight is loud shouting and wild gestures. Empty threats is a speciality, preferably from a safe distance; giving the finger from a car passing by, writing slogans on house walls or hateful messages in prison cells are examples of this. These risk-free acts are, surprisingly, considered by the jackals to be victories!

Fear is their weapon of choice, and precisely the fact that peaceful persons know that they may attack without reason, in groups and armed with knives, is the reason that many ordinary citizens live in daily fear of the jackals when leaving their homes.

In contrast to the bikers (in Danish media called “rockers”), which have also been demonized by the media, the jackals consider the “fear of them” to be something great. While bikers consider unjustified fear from strangers and ordinary citizens a burden, the jackals consider this fear to be an expression of others having respect for them. That they are something!

Most jackals are of immigrant background, but a few “mad dogs” of Danish ethnicity are around. They have either grown up in the wrong spot, or have been attracted by the respect (read: fear) that jackals, and to a high degree police and the press, have created around the jackal way of life.

The vast majority of jackals are Muslims, at least when at home at their fathers or speaking with the priest. They pretend to believe in God and that they follow the Quran. They often invoke Allah — in particular when in prison or when alone and scared. In daily life, however, they often fail to follow the true way of the faith: They smoke hashish, take drugs, commit crime, drink alcohol, fight, swear, commit adultery, and they most certainly cannot be blamed for NOT engaging in usury! The only rules from their faith that most follow are to abstain from eating pork and to attempt to observe Ramadan as well as they can. Apart from that, God and the guidelines of faith are merely consolation used when away from the security of the pack. This kind of faith and consolation are used by the leaders of the packs as a tool for power and to keep the crowd together when there is no other kind of sense behind their desires.

The jackals are occasionally presented as “foreign rockers”, and it has become routine for police and press with statements to the effect that the jackals from the gangs are worse than the “rockers”. This is an artificial comparison, but it creates some useful fear in Mr. and Mrs. Denmark. The bikers have never behaved in this manner, not even when some of them were rockers! The average Dane should obviously be scared when he or she hears about someone worse than the rockers. After twenty years of propaganda about how evil the so-called “rockers” are/were, something even worse appears!

Although these jackals are far from innocent, and to an unprecedented degree have been using pointless violence, it does deserve mention that precisely the police and the press have contributed to encouraging them. That has given them that inkling of courage they never would have had themselves, if it wasn’t for that extensive coverage — something that in the end has rendered them more dangerous to those who do not want to, or are not able to, defend themselves.

Cultural enrichment is something the jackals most certainly are not part of; they are more like pure losers with an assumed role of victim. When many Danes do not feel the need or desire to extend their hand to Islam, it is hardly caused by terrorism in the world at large, or the more or less obvious crime committed by individuals. It is more likely to be the encounter with the jackals of everyday life. Never in one’s life must one bow down to this kind of human trash!

25 comments:

Charlemagne said...

The article could have easily been referencing black and Hispanic gangs in the US.

Why is it that Indian immigrants to the US, who come from a very poor country, adapt well to the US, work hard, and aspire to what I'll call an average white American middle class life while Hispanic immigrants who may come from an equally poor nation adopt the worst aspects of our sub-culture.

Zenster said...

A clear indication of a jackal feeling insecure and thus not having the courage to fight is loud shouting and wild gestures. Empty threats is a speciality, preferably from a safe distance; giving the finger from a car passing by, writing slogans on house walls or hateful messages in prison cells are examples of this. These risk-free acts are, surprisingly, considered by the jackals to be victories!.

This should come as no surprise.

Remember, Muslims referred to the 2002 terrorist attack on Kuta as "The Battle of Bali".

A mass murder atrocity that slays more than 200 innocent people is somehow a "battle". This is but one example of the depths of Muslim depravity.

Do not forget that the only reason why Muslim clerics denounced Amrozi and the other Bali bombers is that they killed a few fellow Muslims in the attacks.

THE DEATHS OF ALMOST 200 UNBELIEVERS DREW SCANT CRITICISM OR CONDEMNATION.

Furor Teutonicus said...

A.F.F.A, F.A.A.F.

Those that know, KNOW.

Keep up the good work lads.

Von Brandenburg-Preußen.

Anonymous said...

"It’s unfortunate that things have come to this pass: the civil authorities are unable to assure ordinary citizens of their safety, so alternative means of doing the same job are being devised."

This is a natural progression - I've come across a brilliant blog that deals with networked tribes, systems disruption, and the emerging bazaar of violence - together with the dwindling legitimacy of the State.

Global Gueriillas

Henrik Ræder said...

Well, the wonders of free enterprise :)

We need to deal with this problem, one way or another. So far, the Danish press and authorities have cried 'Racism!' over the manifesto - and done nothing to indicate they intend to deal with the problems.

costin said...

This description of the jackals reminds me very much by what in Romania we call 'cocalari'(a funny, derogative term for someone with a rude, disgusting behaviour)
The South-Eastern part of Romania has been under Turkish rule for hundreds of year and the 'cocalari', in my view, they represent the 'legacy' and the 'cultural enrichment' of hundreds of years of being ruled by turkish barbarians. But there are differences: they have been here for many generations, almost none of them is still muslim, Romanian is their first language, and they are not so violent as the ones described in this paper. They are the soft version of the gangs of arabs in western Europe. I myself was harassed on the street and kicked to the ground a few times, late in the night in my home town, but I found the gangs of 16-17 yrs old in central Berlin last year more threatening than the 'cocalari.'

The Romanian 'jackals' also walk in gangs. In their gangs you can often see people that don't look Turkish or gypsy at all, that are just regular Romanians. They also sometimes attack people on the street but most of the time no one would dare to kick girls or old people. Lets say they have been christianised a little.
Everybody is familiar with them, and nobody would ever think about saying that they are enriching our culture. It also has nothing to do with racism, as you can sometimes see also blonde guys in their gangs.
It amazes me to see the confusion that western people have in the face of this kind of behaviour. In Romania these people have had all the chances that any normal Romanian had for hundreds of years. They choose to be stupid and primitive, they are not forced into it.
You should treat them like human beings, and hold them accountable fro what they do, don't treat them like retarded children, don't find excuses for them. They are people, just like you, they are responsable for what they do.


P.S.Now its better, most of them are gone stealing and robing in Spain, Italy, Denmark, etc. Romania is quite a safe country. :))

Afonso Henriques said...

Interesting.


P.S. - Is that true that Romania has cleaned itself ethnically by exporting Third Worlders towards us in Western Europe?

Erik said...

Good post. Jackal is a really good term for this particular kind of person, and I immediately recognized some from his description. They need the power of the group to become dangerous, until then they are nothing. They may also require a "leader" who is the one that gets them in that dangerous mode. For some reason or another their leader is the one who changes their whole mindset from a fairly normal person to one of violent intent. If these Hell's Angels are going to use violence against these jackals they would be wise to focus on singling out these leaders and eliminating them. It would have a dual affect of removing the instigator as well as giving clear warning to the other jackals that none of them are safe.

costin said...

Afonso Henriques,
I would put it this harsh to call it ethnic cleansing of third worlders. You have also punks like these among people that are 100% Romanians, made barbaric by the hundreds of years of war with the Turks and 50 years of communism. They just left for their richer pray in the West.
Romanians do not identify themselves with the gypsies, and they become angry when we are associated with the gypsies that rob and do crimes in the west, but i think that gypsies have already became part of Romania long time ago. When talking about the muslims problem in the west Romanians tend to think that its similar to the problem we have with gypsies but gypsies are mostly peaceful and nobody leaves under death threats because of them. Far from it. This is one of the reasons I don't think that Baron's post about the murder in Italy posted in the Cultural Enrichment section really applies.

I just hope that we won't have the kind of problems that the west has with third worlders. But who knows what will happen?

Gregory said...

I couldn't figure out from the article if the Hells Angels were good guys, or bad guys. Are they approved of? Or disapproved of? If they oppose the muslims, why doesn't the community throw flowers at them? Or put wreaths around their necks? Or, JOIN THEM?

Furor Teutonicus said...

Gregory said...

I couldn't figure out from the article if the Hells Angels were good guys, or bad guys. Are they approved of? Or disapproved of? If they oppose the muslims, why doesn't the community throw flowers at them? Or put wreaths around their necks? Or, JOIN THEM?


Good guys... Of COURSE. But then I WOULD say that.

Approved of? By Government no. They are, for example banned in Hamburg, and other German states. The F.B.I have them on the "serious organised crime" list, the same with MI5, and other security forces.

The media have, at the behest of their Government pimps ensured that Angels have got a "bad name" among the general population.

SOME of it deserved, but 90% NOT.

Support them? Hmm. You have to consider most of Scandinavia, Germany Holland and Britain are so poisoned by the "left" and radical liberal scum that they do not know their rear end from their elbow, and could not come to a decision either way if you played with their eyeballs and a blunt B6 pencil.

Of COURSE they should be supporting the Angels. But....They either do not see a threat, OR they are so poisoned that they think any one that does is a "nazi".

"Join them"?

Not impossible. But there ARE rules.

Von Brandenburg-Preußen

Afonso Henriques said...

Gregory, most likely the Hell Angels are criminals.
But they opose the criminal muslims as well also because they see muslim criminality as especially distastefull.

Costin,
I think you're being a little naive, no?
First with Gypsies. We have Gypsies here too! Not that every Gypsy is a murderer or a perverted person but neither are the muslims.

"You have also punks like these among people that are 100% Romanians, made barbaric by the hundreds of years of war with the Turks and 50 years of communism."

Also, it's funny that you seem to find an excuse for white people to be bad. Unfortunetley, white people are humans too and humans behaviour is not necesarrily great.

I don't think that people are more prone to be good or bad because they are of a given ethnicity. You see, the problem is the different cultural normals and the difficults some ethnicties will always have in fitting in some more advanced societies. At least, it's how I see it and I really do not think its far from the truth.

By the way, police came in today and the 13 Romanian Gypsies living in three bed roomed apartmant in my floor went away.
And that's bad because the owner of the house only rents it to ghetto people and such so the next arrival will probabily be worst.

laine said...

Joining a gang to protect oneself from another gang is a maladaptive response contributing to atomization of civil society and propagation of a Hobbesian world of competing gangs.

However, when society has turned its police force into social workers who baby rather than confront criminals especially minority criminals and actually retard citizen efforts to marginalize miscreants (police do this by investigating "crimes" against political correctness) what choice is left for citizens who will be mowed down singly without a substitute form of defense?

Liberalism is provably a form of mental illness, mass hysteria if you will. We treat anyone bent on suicide as mentally ill. Liberals are even worse, dragging the rest of us to their desired doom along with them, first cultural death then literal. That's suicide-homicide.

Furor Teutonicus said...

Afonso Henriques said...

Gregory, most likely the Hell Angels are criminals.


Would you like to come to the club house and repeat that?

I can ask if they would like to arrange an appointement, IF they wish to bother with you.

Von Brandenburg-Preußen.

Henrik R Clausen said...

We certainly have our share of East Europeans (of all kinds) causing trouble in Denmark. Some are gypsies, but they're usually just doing petty crime. We also have some hardcore criminals doing armed robberies in peoples' homes. That's a lot worse.

But due to EU legislation and the free movement of 'labour', we can't really extradite them, just fine them.

PapaBear said...

A lady I know lived in New York near a local hells Angels chapter. The neighborhood was very safe and peaceful for the working people who lived there.

The Angels did not want a large police presence in the neighborhood. Accordingly, they put the word out on the street: if you commit a crime in our neighborhood, you will get a beating. Second offense, you disappear.

Anonymous said...

There's a story in today's German English-language media about the Hell's Angels. Apparently they are warring with a rival white motorcycle gang, the Bandidos.

'Explosive' biker gang war grips Germany

"The northern German state of Schleswig-Holstein is in the midst of a biker gang war as the Bandidos move into the Hells Angels territory. Police have conducted raids in recent days, daily Hamburger Abendblatt reported on Wednesday."

spackle said...

PapaBear & Furor,

Very true. I used to hang out in that neighborhood and frequent a HA bar in NYC in the 80s and it was one block where kids and old folks had zero fear of criminal elements. The same could be said for "little Italy" or neighborhoods with a Mafia presence. HA were great neighbors to have except for the occasional brawls and late night parties spilling outside the clubhouse. And the sound of a "Hog" in its full glory at 3 am can be a little annoying. Otherwise I found most HA to be okay guys. Just a little more macho and 'outgoing' then your usual citizen.

costin said...

Afonso,

"First with Gypsies. We have Gypsies here too! Not that every Gypsy is a murderer or a perverted person but neither are the muslims. "

Yes, correct, but what I wanted to say that at least gypsies are most of the time searching scrap metal, singing, begging and stealing wallets and/or cars. They are not blowing themselves up, they are not planing on capturing an entire society. I don't know how to put it but for one reason or another I tend to not have any kind of aversion towards gypsies. And no, its not politically correctness screwing with my brains.


Also, it's funny that you seem to find an excuse for white people to be bad. Unfortunetley, white people are humans too and humans behaviour is not necesarrily great.

I don't try to find excuses, not at all. The human being is rarely a mentally strong creature and is often easy to break but in the end the responsability lies in the individual. He might have lived a harsh life in a criminal regime, but acting like barbarians should never be pardoned by anything, like the multiculturalists insist we should. Human beings are perfectable, they can and should change for the better. If you let yourself staying in filth and don't rise up, its your fault. So, no Afonso, I don't excuse anything.

I was not talking about the Romanian jackal to excuse the gypsy or the muslim ones. The obvious is that they to tend to be much more in a 'jackal environment/society', where being a jackal is the norm to which you have to stand up. And in communist Romania, too often you needed to be a jackal to have a decent life. People are easy to corrupt.These violent immigrants from west come from such jackal-environments, you might have a reason to be more understanding, but not tolerant with the intolerant. We don't have the option of remaining understanding/tolerant/passive in the face of pure evil.

P.S. My lack of aversion for gypsies, maybe, comes from lack of the kind of contacts you have with them :)

PRCalDude said...

Joining a gang to protect oneself from another gang is a maladaptive response contributing to atomization of civil society and propagation of a Hobbesian world of competing gangs.

However, when society has turned its police force into social workers who baby rather than confront criminals especially minority criminals and actually retard citizen efforts to marginalize miscreants (police do this by investigating "crimes" against political correctness) what choice is left for citizens who will be mowed down singly without a substitute form of defense?


Exactly. So "joining a gang" would not be a "maladaptive response" in that context. The fact is, gangs like the Hell's Angels cannot survive without government participation in their trafficking. [1,2] Every citizen of the legitimate state should understand the government's willful participation in the illicit state and act accordingly. If the state can benefit from involvement with criminal gangs, so can the citizen. Rest assured, the state is benefiting from Muslim immigration and subsequent aggression.

[1] Glenny, M. "McMafia." Random House, 2008.
[2] Naim, M. "Illicit." Anchor, 2006.

Anonymous said...

Well, i dont want to blow my own trumpet here, but a year or 2 ago there were some clashes between Anderlecht-supporters (a Belgium football-club) and immigrants.

I then predicted that the resistance would start with these kind of groups that allready have some kind of organization, are proned to violence and are outside the mainstream so they dont have to care about being called rascist, nazi and so on. They are outcasts anyway!

The tipping point will be when ordinary citizens also start to organize themselves and start to fight back.

No sign of that in Holland just yet, unfortunately!

Anonymous said...

I live in Odense, where we have seen a fair share of this "war" going on. I remember some years ago, Hells Angels moved into a sertain neighbourhood where older people had often been mugged and so on. When HA moved in, all that stopped at once, and I remember an old lady who lived right by the HA place, saying that these bikers where th best neighbours she had ever had, always willing to help her out when she needed it...
I am not blind, I know that HA seldom are among the best people on earth, but I also know that they would never ever mug a little old lady. The jackals, they do it all the time...

PRCalDude said...

I am not blind, I know that HA seldom are among the best people on earth, but I also know that they would never ever mug a little old lady. The jackals, they do it all the time...

The thing to do is to build a coalition between otherwise law-abiding Danes and the HA's. Economically, it will benefit the HA's because local Danes can help eliminate their competition for trafficking in guns and drugs. Really, no one cares about these things anyway, so it's a win-win. The HA's can do most of the dirty work in getting the government to look the other way as the violence escalates between the HA's and the Muslim savages.

Time for you to start drinking at biker bars.

Cobra said...

I think I ought to add some info about gypsies in Romania.
While they are not as violent as muslims in some parts of the West, and somehow more civilized by the European culture they lived within for some years, they are far from being harmless.
As a native Romanian, it is not advisable to go at night in their neighbourhoods. Their gangs can be very violent and they, in general, do not earn their living in a legal way.
Many of them steal, cheat and harass.
For example, they almost "conquered" the historical center of the city of Timisoara, by harassing and chasing out other inhabitants of the buildings they target.
They are a menace to the society, but what can the Romanians do?
I do not see ant solution, but to work hard in civilizing them.

Anonymous said...

Afonso Henriques said...
P.S. - Is that true that Romania has cleaned itself ethnically by exporting Third Worlders towards us in Western Europe?

Romania did nothing to export their thugs and misfits. The thugs and the misfits (with good people looking for a honest job) exported themselves from a low-reward, high-risk place to high-reward low-risk places.

With the economic grow of Romania and the other east Europe countries in the EU, many hard working Romanians (and other hard working people) found out that is not so rewarding to work in West Europe, so many returned home.
The others will not return until we start to crack them hard (like sentencing them to long jail terms when they step out of the limits).

The hardening in cracking crime is the most important feature. When they will find the risks too high, they will self-deport to their home countries.