Sunday, January 09, 2011

Replacing the System With Islam

This is one of the most refreshing videos I’ve seen in a long time. This guy, Abu Mounisa, is a lot like Anjem Choudary — he doesn’t pussyfoot around. Forget the taqiyya, forget the kitman, forget telling the kafir all those sweet pretty lies he longs to hear!

This is the real stuff, the full monty, a big barrel of pure unadulterated one hundred proof Islamic supremacist moonshine, served out for everyone to see and hear:


How come he doesn’t get arrested for “inciting religious hatred”?

Yes, I know, I know. That was a rhetorical question.

I understand the rules in Modern Multicultural Britain all too well. There are two sets of them: one for Muslims, and one for everyone else


Hat tip: Vlad Tepes.

Bath House Bad Boy

Cultural Enrichment News

A young PhD student got himself in a spot of trouble in the changing room at a swimming pool in Manchester. The realization that unclothed ladies were so tantalizingly close was too much for him — he succumbed to temptation and slipped a mirror under the cubicle’s partition to have a look. Twice.

Unfortunately, he got caught. What’s interesting in this case is his lawyer’s “cultural differences” defense. In Modern Multicultural Britain, it’s every enriched offender’s preferred excuse.

By the way — the Mohammed Coefficient of this case is 100%.

From The Manchester Evening News:

Cubicle Pervert Spied on Women With Mirror at Manchester Aquatics Centre

Bataineh, 35, a PhD student at Salford University, admitted committing two counts of voyeurism at the Manchester Aquatics Centre.


A pervert used a mirror to spy on women as they got changed at swimming baths in Manchester.

A court heard that student Mohammad Bataineh, who is originally from Jordan, was confused by ‘very permissive’ Western society.

This young man is not too “confused” to immigrate to England, register for university, attend lectures, take exams, write papers, etc. But when he saw women walking around like uncovered meat, he was evidently confused enough to think, “By the prophet’s beard! That gives me permission to put a mirror under the changing room partition!”

A little peek into paradise for him, perhaps…

The article continues:

The Growing Worldwide Persecution of Christians

One of our Slovak readers, who prefers to remain anonymous, sends a translation about recent events in his country’s capital, along with this introductory note:

Last week a rally in support of the persecuted Christians took place in Bratislava. Your readers may be interested in how Slovak politicians react to recent horrible events concerning Christians abroad.

Below is his translation of an article from the respected Slovak newspaper SME:

Palko: Europe Shows Disregard for the Killing of Christians

Vladimír PalkoBratislava — Europe hesitates with expressions of solidarity, as if the killing of Christians in the world was not worth noticing. Those words were stated today to the News Agency of the Slovak Republic by the chairman of the non parliamentary party Conservative Democrats of Slovakia (CDS) and former interior minister Vladimir Palko, who attended the rally in support of the persecuted Christians in Bratislava. The event had been arranged by Young Conservative Democrats of Slovakia, which is a youth movement of CDS.

“The motive is the increasing persecution, even killing of Christians all over world. Since we announced this event, several dozen Christians have been killed in Nigeria, 21 Christians in Egypt on New Year’s Eve, and many other incidents. It’s becoming increasingly apparent that this problem is acute,” Palko pointed out.

According to him, today’s rally resulted in an appeal addressed to the Slovak President, the Slovak government, and the National Council of the Slovak Republic, urging a push through our foreign policy for the observance of human rights for Christians and freedom of religion worldwide.

Saturday, January 08, 2011

Gates of Vienna News Feed 1/8/2011

Gates of Vienna News Feed 1/8/2011The Swiss Central Bank has decided that Portuguese government debt is no longer safe enough to be accepted as a guarantee in cash transactions. Portuguese treasury bonds have been downgraded by the ratings agencies, and the Swiss are concerned about the risk of relying on them.

In other news, French President Nicolas Sarkozy says that the attacks on Christians in Iraq, Egypt, and other countries constitute “religious cleansing”.

To see the headlines and the articles, open the full news post.

Thanks to 4symbols, A. Millar, C. Cantoni, Diana West, Gaia, Insubria, KGS, Nick, Nilk, SF, TV, Vic, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Commenters are advised to leave their comments at this post (rather than with the news articles) so that they are more easily accessible.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

Lowering the Black Flag of Jihad

The Black Flag of Jihad

As most readers will remember, last year on November 11th — Remembrance Day — Muslim zealots gathered in London to burn poppies and insult British troops. The English Defence League mounted a counter-demonstration, and Tommy Robinson was arrested after he leapt a barrier and grabbed a black jihad flag from one of the demonstrators.

The Black Flag of Jihad is more than just a declaration of Muslim faith. It is Mohammed’s battle flag.

Throughout the history of Islam it has been displayed or flown whenever the mujahideen sally forth to behead the infidels. Suicide bombers record their last videos with the black flag in the background. Terrorists behead their captives for the camera while standing in front of the black flag.

The Black Flag of Jihad is a declaration of war. Those thugs who carried it that day in London were committing sedition and treason against the British state.

Tommy Robinson should have been given an official award for his heroic behavior, and the thugs burning the poppies should have been arrested.

But that’s not the way things work in Modern Multicultural Britain.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

For the last few weeks, various members of the Counterjihad Collective have been discussing Mr. Robinson’s legal defense and what might be done to assist it. A number of people searched for jihad photos and videos featuring the Black Flag of Jihad, and then Vlad Tepes gathered them together in a single project.

The resulting video, a Vlad/Baron/G-Man joint venture, is below.

Update: The G-Man was also closely involved in the initial concept and the researche which led to the production of this video. Many thanks to the G-Man:


I’ll be writing more about the Black Flag of Jihad in a later post.

The Looming Islamization of Austria

Last month the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) was part of a delegation of European Counterjihad parties that visited Israel (Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff’s report on this momentous occasion may be read here).

Heinz-Christian Strache, the leader of the FPÖ, reciprocated by inviting Ayoub Kara, a deputy minister in the current governing coalition in Israel, to visit Austria. Once again Elisabeth has prepared a report on these events for Gates of Vienna, with translation help from JLH.


The Looming Islamization of Austria
by Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, with translation by JLH


Strache: “I expect to be defined as a Christian and not as an unbeliever. This is the foundation for dialogue!”

Ayoub Kara and Heinz-Christian StracheJust a few weeks ago, a delegation of politicians from the new European Right visited Israel and met with leading Israeli politicians and members of the Knesset. Ayoub Kara, a deputy minister in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet, a member of the Likud, and one of Netanyahu’s confidants, came to Vienna on a return visit. Already in Israel, the leader of the FPÖ (Freedom Party), Heinz-Christian Strache, had extended the invitation to Ayoub Kara, which was taken up immediately.

Upon his arrival minister Ayoub met with high-ranking members of FPÖ and reiterated that the Freedom Party was his most important contact in Austria on the question of fundamentalist Islam. Bomb attacks, which for decades have become almost the norm in Israel, are no longer just an Israeli problem, but also a European and a worldwide one. Kara decried the fact that those terrorists are acting under the guise of religion and that human rights are being trampled on. This fundamentalist Islam must be confronted relentlessly. Concerning Austria, Ayoub said that FPÖ is the only party that addresses the problem and that stands up for the freedom of nations and peoples and fights against racism and anti-Semitism. Like the FPÖ, Kara also criticized creeping Muslim immigration in European states, which will — short-term or long-term — lead to a Muslim takeover of Europe and the introduction of catastrophic Islamism. This will be detrimental to human rights. One must defend against this. And just as FPÖ is fighting for the Austrians’ right to their own country, so does Kara want to fight for the same for Israelis. Kara directed at his critics the observation that upon close scrutiny he had found nothing against Israel in the party’s statutes. In addition, the minister promised international support for FPÖ in view of the false picture painted by the media.

At a press conference, Strache emphasized FPÖ’s strict rejection of all totalitarian ideologies, be it Fascism, National Socialism, Communism, Stalinism, or Islamism. “Furthermore, we reject all ideologies that remotely support, endorse, or practice terrorism,” added Strache.

The day before Christmas the Freedom Party invited the interested public to a symposium titled: “Peace in the Middle East — A Pious Hope?” with Minister Ayoub, Mr. Strache, Mr. David Lasar and other high-ranking FPÖ officials on the podium.

Mr. Kara said the following in his speech:

It is important to cooperate with every element, organization, or party to fight terror, religious fundamentalism, which is a problem and danger to the entire world. I want to meet with Europeans because the same thing happened 60 years ago [alluding to the dangers prior to the Nazi takeover of Germany and World War II]. People were naïve back then, and they are naïve now. People are not speaking out loud about the problems. Muslims are killing people everyday, but nothing is happening [no one is reacting].

I want to thank Mr. Strache, FPÖ, and all parties in Europe that Israel is on the frontline [of this war]. In the future there will be organizations in every corner. Today in Israel, tomorrow in Sweden in Austria, everywhere.

I am not Jewish, but I am more Jewish than the Jews themselves. Non-Jews in Israel feel the same as Jews. I will fight with my Druse friends. They [the Muslims] hate us, they kill [us], and we defend Israel, we fight for Israel. There are only two million of us [Druse]. In Syria, Druse are sent to jail, there is no defense possible.

Other Arab states are sending messages to Israel that they are afraid of Iran and fundamentalism, but they cannot say it publicly. People are afraid because there are no human rights in the Middle East.

We must stop these fundamentalist organizations. Islam says: “We have the solution. All must submit to Islam.” But I like liberal life. They hate my policies. I speak out: I want the world to be free. Seventy years ago, people were quiet and did nothing to stop the situation. I am here today [to say]: Let us stop Islamic fundamentalism together before Iran attacks us. If you are afraid, you cannot stop anything. [But] we must stop this.

In Israel, they are saying: “Why are you going to Austria?”

I say: “Let us be together! I am glad to be sitting here next to my friend HC Strache!”

Strache’s reply: “I was not in Israel incognito. I was in a dialogue with Minister Kara. It is important to have dialogue. Mr. Kara has been criticized heavily by Ariel Muzicant [the leader of the Jewish Faith Community in Vienna]. This is absurd! It is a result of the SPÖ (Social Democratic Party) and its ideology. FPÖ has been denounced for decades. But the ideals of freedom must be defended!”

Minister Kara added: “Only one hundred years ago there were one hundred million Christians; now, there are not even one million Christians in the Middle East. The others either moved away or converted.”

Strache: “I expect to be defined as a Christian and not as an unbeliever. This is the foundation for dialogue!”

Ariel Muzicant, the leader of the Vienna Jewish Community and active supporter of the Vienna Social Democrats, has heavily criticized both Strache’s visit to Israel and Ayoub Kara’s return visit in Vienna.

Biding Their Time

Koran, 9th century AD

Last night we posted a translated news article from the Netherlands about serious infighting among radical Muslims in the Netherlands. The spat included a secretly recorded phone call between Imam Fawaz Jneid and the leader of Shariah4Belgium and Shariah4Holland.

A commenter named heatsketch left a very interesting analysis of the exchange between the two leaders. His observations are spot-on — better than anything I could do.

Two new words for our Arabic lexicon:

  • Madhhab: The fiqh (body of Islamic jurisprudence) of one of the four schools of Sunni law (Hanafi, Shafi’i, Maliki, and Hanbali).
  • Hisbah: The correct application of sharia in a state governed by Islamic law.

And the analysis:

What Fawaz is doing is saying that the time for Jihad is not now. Salafists act based on mujtihad, or personal consensus, as opposed to ijtihad, or communal consensus, of the regular four madhhab of Islamic Sunni law. Fawaz is not a Salafist. He is of the traditional madhhab.

The Sharia of the traditional madhhab states that the ummah cannot wage aggressive jihad without permission from the caliph, and there is no caliph, because there is no kalifah. Fawaz is clearly just saying that now is not the time, and that Moslems must get their own house in order before attacking the dar ul-harb.

Notice how he says “who... has given you a fatwa?”, implying that if a fatwa was issued by a traditional scholar he views as legitimate, he wouldn’t be objecting.

Notice also how he says “What you are doing brings difficulties for the Muslims in the Netherlands and in Belgium.” The Sharia of the traditional madhhab states that one should not be seditious in infidel nations or even wage jihad if those actions will bring harm to other Moslems.

Muslim Human Shields for Egyptian Christians

I posted the other night about the “moderate” Muslims in Pakistan who publicly supported the assassination of the governor of Pakistan and anyone who agreed with him about modifying the blasphemy law. In response, a commenter named Al-Khwarizmi left a link to an article from Ahram Online about Egyptian Muslims who volunteered to act as “human shields” for the Copts’ Christmas mass in their cathedral in Cairo, saying that “these are moderates”.

I’ll let readers decide for themselves the larger significance of this story. I see three possibilities:

1.These people are well-meaning and sincere, in which case they are takfiris or apostates from true Islam, and are taking a grave risk.
2.Given that the “human shields” included sons of Hosni Mubarak, #1 seems unlikely. As Egghead suggests, it could simply be a publicity stunt, with propaganda value for Egyptian nationalists. The volunteers would have relied on state security to make sure they weren’t harmed.
3.The participants knew very well that there would be no terror attack that night, and therefore their actions put them in no danger. Once again, the event could be used for nationalist propaganda. This scenario is only plausible if (a) the participants had connections with the state intelligence services, and (b) the intelligence services are working cooperatively with elements of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Or maybe there are other possible explanations. In any case, here’s the article:

Egypt’s Muslims attend Coptic Christmas mass, serving as “human shields”

Muslims turned up in droves for the Coptic Christmas mass Thursday night, offering their bodies, and lives, as “shields” to Egypt’s threatened Christian community

Egypt’s majority Muslim population stuck to its word Thursday night. What had been a promise of solidarity to the weary Coptic community, was honoured, when thousands of Muslims showed up at Coptic Christmas eve mass services in churches around the country and at candle light vigils held outside.

From the well-known to the unknown, Muslims had offered their bodies as “human shields” for last night’s mass, making a pledge to collectively fight the threat of Islamic militants and towards an Egypt free from sectarian strife.

“We either live together, or we die together,” was the sloganeering genius of Mohamed El-Sawy, a Muslim arts tycoon whose cultural centre distributed flyers at churches in Cairo Thursday night, and who has been credited with first floating the “human shield” idea.

Among those shields were movie stars Adel Imam and Yousra, popular preacher Amr Khaled, the two sons of President Hosni Mubarak, and thousands of citizens who have said they consider the attack one on Egypt as a whole.

“This is not about us and them,” said Dalia Mustafa, a student who attended mass at Virgin Mary Church on Maraashly. “We are one. This was an attack on Egypt as a whole, and I am standing with the Copts because the only way things will change in this country is if we come together.”

The Rape Victim as Criminal

This news story from The Saudi Gazette (hat tip: Vlad Tepes) is so fundamentally disturbing that I’ve put the entire text of the article below the jump. If you are sensitive to issues related to rape and sexual violence, you may want to skip it:

Girl gets a year in jail, 100 lashes for adultery

Friday, January 07, 2011

Gates of Vienna News Feed 1/7/2011

Gates of Vienna News Feed 1/7/2011Ireland may have recorded its first officially-designated honor killing. A man of unidentified ethnicity stabbed a man and a woman in what police have identified as an “honor-related” crime. The male victim, of Pakistani origin, died of his wounds. There’s no word yet on the Mohammed coefficient of this tragic incident.

In other news, according to a Gallup poll, only 31% of Americans identify themselves as Democrats. This is the lowest score for that question since the company first began polling it.

To see the headlines and the articles, open the full news post.

Thanks to Bewick, C. Cantoni, Caroline Glick, DF, Diana West, DS, Freedom Fighter, heroyalwhyness, Insubria, JD, JP, McR, Nilk, Salome, TV, Vlad Tepes, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Commenters are advised to leave their comments at this post (rather than with the news articles) so that they are more easily accessible.

Caveat: Articles in the news feed are posted “as is”. Gates of Vienna cannot vouch for the authenticity or accuracy of the contents of any individual item posted here. We check each entry to make sure it is relatively interesting, not patently offensive, and at least superficially plausible. The link to the original is included with each item’s title. Further research and verification are left to the reader.

The Challenge That We Have

Rep. Allen West (R-FL) — oh, how satisfying to type those words! — gave a memorable speech last month in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, when he was still the congressman-elect.

When Col. West speaks out about Islam, he sounds exactly like one of the contributors to this blog. To have him in the halls of Congress is a real boost for the Counterjihad.

Many thanks to Kitman for YouTubing this video:

That Was The Year That Was

A. Millar has posted a review of last year’s events in the UK at Hudson New York. Some excerpts are below:

UK Rundown 2010: Shaken but not Stirred
by A. Millar

With an election having taken place in May, 2010 should have been the year in which politics took center stage. Instead, the pressing issues of the day were largely ignored during the campaign period, as they have been for the last decade. Partly as a consequence, 2010 turned into the year in which politics spilled over into the streets.

Welfare cuts were, perhaps inevitably, an issue that the parties somewhat tackled. Still, students — the base of Britain’s third party, the Liberal Democrats — expressed their outrage at the university-fees hike proposed by the coalition government (of which the Lib Dems are the junior partner). The students were also whipped up into rioting throughout November and December by various socialist organizations — a situation that appears to have remained off the radars of both the authorities and the media.

As former University College London student Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab attempted to blow up an airplane over Detroit on Christmas Day 2009, the year also began with perhaps some unfortunately rhetorical questions about radicalization in the UK. Islamist extremism and terrorism, both attempted and actual, were more in evidence in 2010 than ever before, except of course for 2005, the year of the 7/7 London attacks: throughout this year, members of the banned extremist organization Islam4UK were especially visible. Islamist infiltration in the UK is less easy to detect, but the surface was scratched enough — especially by center-Right newspaper The Telegraph — for it to have been periodically exposed.

If the authorities were shaken by Abdulmutallab’s attempt to murder Americans, apparently they were not all stirred to grasp the extent of the problem in the UK. Others were: 2010 saw a rise in the number of anti-Islamist protests, held across the country, largely by the English Defense League movement — described by Prime Minister David Cameron as “terrible people.”

December 2010 brought yet fresh embarrassment, with a virtual repeat of December 2009: Taimour Abdulwahab al-Abdaly, a former student at the British city of Luton, carried out a suicide bombing in Stockholm, killing, however, only himself.

With special attention to radical Islam in Britain, some events are more dramatic than others, although they all tell us much about the broad state of the country. Other important events, such as the general election, occurred, as well as some that are minor, but which may give a more complete and nuanced picture of Great Britain today.

January:

The extremist group Islam4UK is banned. Former Islam4UK leader Anjem Choudary appears on BBC chat show the Daily Politics [video] following the ban, describing it as “a waste of time.”

The United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) calls for the Burka to be banned.

February:

Islamic preacher Abdullah Hakim Quick speaks at Kings College University, London. He has reportedly previously denounced the “filth” of Jews, and asserts the (Sharia Law) death penalty for homosexuality.

The Telegraph reports that the governing Labour Party has been infiltrated by Islamic extremists: “The Islamic Forum of Europe (IFE) — which believes in jihad and Sharia Law, and wants to turn Britain and Europe into an Islamic state — has placed sympathizers in elected office and claims, correctly, to be able to achieve ‘mass mobilization’ of voters.” (See October.)

March:

Geert Wilders screens Fitna in the House of Lords, at the invitation of Lord Pearson (UKIP) and Baronness Cox. Wilders tells the audience: “As you undoubtedly all know, better then I do, also in your country the mass immigration and Islamization have rapidly increased. This has put an enormous pressure on your British society. Look what is happening in, for example, Birmingham, Leeds, Bradford and here in London. British politicians who have forgotten about Winston Churchill have now taken the path of least resistance. They have given up. They have given in.”

A group of “wannabe” Islamic militants calling themselves “The Blackburn Resistance” are convicted of terrorist offenses.

With an election set for early May, Britain’s political parties begin campaigning. David Cameron unveils his “Big Society” theme for Britain.

April:

Fundamentalist Bitch Fight in The Netherlands

Our Dutch correspondent Bolleke sends his translation (with interpolated commentary) of an article from today’s De Telegraaf about what he calls a “fundamentalist bitch fight in the Netherlands”:

Fawaz JneidImam Sheikh Fawaz Jneid [known hate beard] has attacked Shariah4Holland, the new Muslim organization that wants to introduce Islamic law in the Netherlands. “Either these young people are mentally insane and irrational, or this is a band of exploiters and criminals that are after bloodshed justified by Islam,” says the imam of The Hague’s as-Sunnah mosque, who asks the authorities in the Netherlands and Belgium to arrest the organization behind Shariah4Holland and Shariah4Belgium.

According to the imam the Muslim organization is a criminal organization or a bunch of crazy people, in any event, the organizers behind it must be incarcerated.

“If these figures actually suffer from mental disorders, then it is a duty to put them away in a mental institution. Otherwise they must be locked in prison,” says Fawaz in a written statement. His words are remarkable, because in the Netherlands preacher Sheikh Fawaz Jneid is known as a radical Muslim, who once in a sermon begged that Theo van Gogh and Ayaan Hirsi Ali would get serious diseases. But even for him the new shariah clubs are too radical [yeah, right!].

The Belgian spokesman for the organizations both in Belgium and the Netherlands, Abou Imran, is furious about this statement. In revenge, he has secretly recorded a phone conversation with the imam that he posted on the internet. This audio recording shows that the Dutch Muslim community is embarrassed [really? NOT] by the controversial organizations in Belgium and the Netherlands: “What you are doing brings difficulties for the Muslims in the Netherlands and in Belgium,” grumbles the imam from The Hague.

“Your actions have nothing to do neither with the Islamic law nor with the jihad. And also your behavior is not of the shariah, nor of the jihad. If you’re so concerned about our brethren in Afghanistan, then fine, go there. May Allah make it easier for you,” says Fawaz cynically.

“You exclaim: ‘we Muslims are coming’, to put the Muslim flag on top of the Royal House. That is aggression and an outright military challenge. You scare people away from Islam. Don’t worry about whether the unbelievers lock you up; if I catch you guys, I’ll beat you up!” warns the imam from The Hague.

Error

The Art of Strategic Citizenship — Part 2

Below is the second installment of Takuan Seiyo’s latest series of essays. Part 1 may be read here.

Tomoe #2

The Art of Strategic Citizenship
Part 2 of 4 — The firewood under the cauldron


by Takuan Seiyo

The 19th of China’s 36 Stratagems counsels, Fu di chou xin — Steal the firewood from under the cauldron. That’s strategy appropriate for a situation when your opponent is preponderant. And the opposition to Americans who believe that they are being robbed and sold out by their own ruling elite, the Constitution is just fine and enough, and the re-engineering of society in the last 50 years is a disaster, is vast and preponderant.

With the cauldron being impregnable iron, it’s proper to examine everything pertaining to the firewood. First, why was it allowed to be gathered and lit in the first place. Largely, it’s the Pogo quandary: We have met the enemy, and he is us.

In a recent article, Victor Davis Hanson describes a putrefying California, more like a Mexican backwater hamlet than… than what? A white people’s country, that’s what. Unfortunately, the people that took over a town called El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Angeles del Río de Porciúncula and failed to anglicize its name at the outset, set itself up for a fall at the outset. When it has further invited and encouraged colonization by Mexicans, and built industries around Mexican labor, and allowed that ethnocentric Mexican office holders be elected or appointed, and voted in “conservative” WASP Presidents and Senators who act as the Mexicans’ spearhead, and failed to defend its land against the invasion, it has forfeited that land.

Whites are still a majority in 52 of the biggest 100 cities, but even unlikely places like Utah are coasting toward a 30-40% minority ratio in the urban zones, and “conservative” publications like Wall Street Journal report with total equanimity that the United States nears a “Racial Milestone.” What they do not report is that the milestone is cultural and economic; that it’s a geopolitical earthquake that will reverberate for 1,000 years; that demography is destiny.

It’s no coincidence that of the 14 American cities that face imminent bankruptcy (plus two small ones), four are in that minimum security asylum zone with Bolivian place names: Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose and San Francisco. The others are also blessed in the strength of diversity, either through a minority majority (New York, Detroit, Washington D.C, Honolulu, Newark, Camden, Paterson) or a minority 40%+ plurality (Chicago, Cincinnati, Reading).

All this is increasingly obvious, particularly to those not brain-altered in institutions of higher learning or on the oligarchy’s payroll. On all occasions when the public has a chance to express itself on related issues such as immigration, bilingual education, gayization or dhimmization, the people overwhelmingly reject the diversity project. The ruling elite continues implementing it nonetheless by a series of increasingly totalitarian measures, including judicial nullification of inconvenient plebiscites, new laws explicitly at odds with the will of the people, persecution of “crimes of intolerance,” and executive rulings that circumvent the apparatus of democracy.

This phenomenon of a ruling oligarchy on autopilot dead-set on sabotage of its subject population is repeated in the financial sphere. No matter how many Tea Party marches or public opinion polls express vehement opposition, the White-House-Congress-Fed-Wall Street Axis continues the blitz of bailout, ballooning debt, bottoming dollar and bloated billion-dollar bankster bonuses. No matter how critical the assessments of still-sane economic pundits and traders — e.g. James Grant, Nouriel Roubini, Jim Rogers, Martin Weiss, Tyler Durden, Karl Denninger — the Ponzi pyramid builders at the peaks of power take the country farther over the precipice in the greatest Inside Con Job in history.

Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo — all bankrupt temples of naked reptilian impulses — found a way to transfer 60% of America’s Gross National Product to themselves versus less then 20% they had 15 years ago[1]. It’s a simple trick: you pocket the gains but offload the losses on current and future taxpayers. All it takes is two wholly owned subsidiaries in Washington: the one legislating and regulating (but not bankster biz), and the other printing money at will.

Pulling the NWO oligarchs’ carosse in tandem with the demographic Trojan horse and the monetary ruin steed is a third runaway equine. It’s the out-of-control diarrhea of laws, statutes and regulations binding and bending the citizen ever more tightly and despotically: so many that they are beyond counting and so vile that the crookeder the parliamentary crook, the more he boasts of the quantity of laws he has inflicted on his lessers. The laws, the Harry Reids, the judges, the Wise Latinas, the nullifiers of the Constitution uphold their part in the bargain. With a 72,000-page tax code, one unread monster omnibus 2000-page trillion dollar bill after another, unending pillage of every dollar they can grab from the bankrupt Treasury selling bogus IOUs to a mad Fed slathering snake oil for illiquidity on a disease of insolvency, laws piled upon laws prohibiting the sunrise on penalty of assets forfeiture under Part IX, Chapter 411, Section 37 and declaring the sunset invalid per 9th Circuit Court of Appeals v. Reality, this is the most wretched crew to pilot America, ever.

What is to be done? What can be done? For want of space and readers’ endurance, we can treat only one issue in this forum, suggested by the two comments of the reader “jeppo” in Part 1. To return to the Chinese analogy, this chapter will deal with the theme of who is tending to the fire, and the next one will speculate consequentially how to not really “steal” the firewood but unleash a mighty rain on it.