This is Black Friday, and the American people have been doing what they traditionally do on this day — screaming and clawing at each other as they attempt to grab marked-down merchandise at major retail outlets.
The United States is in the midst of a political crisis of unprecedented proportions, but most Americans seem blissfully unaware of it. One cause of their ignorance is a deliberate attempt by the major media to keep them ignorant — churning out predigested pap while keeping a thumb on the Globalist/Progressive pan of the propaganda scales.
The other reason, of course, is a near-universal preoccupation with acquiring iPads and TVs and shoes and jeans and all those other indispensable goods that had people clamoring at the doors of Wal-Mart in the wee hours of this morning.
While their attention has been thus distracted, the possibility of free and fair elections in America has been pre-empted, with massive electoral fraud now the order of the day, thanks to the intelligence and professional skills of people in my line of work — computer programmers.
While our votes are being discounted, our right to free speech is being taken away. Our current president and secretary of state, in their infinite wisdom and with the best interests of their nation at heart, have decided that the United States must become shariah-compliant. Our government, in collaboration with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, is moving forward with a program known as the Istanbul Process, which is intended to Islamize America and the rest of the West by demanding the passage of laws against defamation of Islam, with or without the consent of the general public.
The American people, mired as they are in ignorance, superstition, and racism, are opposed to this idea whenever they happen to become aware of it. Therefore the Istanbul Process is kept under the radar most of the time. When it does have be discussed in public, it is sugar-coated as a nice multicultural peace-’n’-brotherhood initiative.
And, yes, it does involve brotherhood: the Muslim Brotherhood.
Take a look at the following video that Vlad Tepes put together a few days ago. It concerns the events in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, the movie Innocence of Muslims, an Egyptian-American named Mark Basseley Youssef (a.k.a. Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, a.k.a. Sam Bacile), and UN Resolution 16/18 (as explained by Major Stephen Coughlin):
After studying all of the material outlined in this video, one is forced to conclude that the September “Days of Rage” over the Mohammed movie were a manufactured crisis, and that Mark Basseley Youssef was set up, with the help of the United States government.
This is how far our current political crisis has proceeded, but without most Americans being aware of it. And when you contemplate what’s happening, it really is hard to believe that our government has deliberately and cynically connived to fake a crisis, aid the Muslim Brotherhood in its attempt to gain dominance, and put an American citizen in prison for making a movie, all in order to gut the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Yet these conclusions are now unavoidable. They provide answers to the following questions, which are otherwise unanswerable:
| 1. | Why was the attack on the consulate in Benghazi instantly blamed on the Mohammed movie? | |
| 2. | Why did the administration stick to that story long after it became ludicrously untenable? | |
| 3. | Why did Hillary Clinton feel compelled to tell a grieving father that she was going to make sure the maker of the movie went to jail — as if it would ease his grieving heart by telling him that his son had not died in vain? | |
| 4. | Why were the CIA’s talking points for Susan Rice changed so early, and in such a way that the authorship of the changes could not be traced? | |
| 5. | Why did a sleazy criminal and government informant decide to make a stupid, unwatchable movie that he knew very well (as a Copt, he could not help but know) would earn him a death fatwa across the entire globe? | |
| 6. | Who paid to make a movie that would expose everyone involved in its production to the risk of being murdered? |
There are numerous other questions, but those will do for a start.
The only plausible explanation is that the highest levels of the American government have decided that the United States will become subject to the legal strictures of shariah concerning “slander” against Islam.
The good news is that Benghazi threw a monkey wrench into the plan. Americans weren’t supposed to end up dead, and our government didn’t count on an Al Qaeda attack as part of the “spontaneous” outrage against those who insult Islam.
It was probably the Iranians who managed to scupper the scheme — but that’s another story to be told at a later date.
I leave our readers to ponder these facts and speculations while they recover from Black Friday on Weary Saturday. If our leaders have their way, every day of the week will be black, once the light of the First Amendment has been turned off for good.
7 comments:
Given the margin of victory, there is no real possibility that fraud flipped the result of the election.
The overall pattern of results was strongly consistent with polling ahead of time. Consistent with past voting patterns. Consistent with what we know of how the demographics has changed.
Had this election been squeaky clean, no states would have gone different from how they did go.
Very likely, no Congressional races. There was nothing such as the MN senate race last time that was very close and rather suspicious.
People who want to be known as realists have got to stare unpleasant realities in the face. Head on. No excuses.
Obama got more votes, and spent and campaigned intelligently so as to get them where he needed them.
A bit of a tangential point perhaps but - isn't it a good thing that the elites need to cheat to maintain their position? It proves the point that they're supported only by a minority. They must be feeling vulnerable; expect their cheats to become ever more visible as they are forced to drop their democratic facade.
Anon @2:23am --
You are absolutely right.
As I have often said, Obama is not the disease, but the symptom. The fact that 47% of the public will vote for him is as significant as 49%, or 51%, or 53%.
Anything more than about 20% support for Obama signifies a serious national problem.
But you miss my point. My point was not that Obama won because of fraud, but that massive electoral fraud is now the order of the day.
Hundreds of precincts reported ZERO votes for Mitt Romney. This can only be the case if the results were tampered with, presumably using software deliberately designed to do just that, as described in the video.
We are close to becoming a one-party state now at the federal level, which means that such fraud is likely to become the norm, rather than the exception.
That's my point.
1. Why was the attack on the consulate in Benghazi instantly blamed on the Mohammed movie?
Because there is evidence to suggest the final version of the "movie" - the one blamed for the "spontaneous riots" - was tweaked and uploaded by a gov't contractor. There's YT video where a guy did some detective work on it. The reason why is clear: they had to have a ready made excuse for the attack on Benghazi which they knew was going to happen.
2. Why did the administration stick to that story long after it became ludicrously untenable?
Because it's either that or admit the obvious: the whole thing was a setup.
3. Why did Hillary Clinton feel compelled to tell a grieving father that she was going to make sure the maker of the movie went to jail — as if it would ease his grieving heart by telling him that his son had not died in vain?
Two reasons. (a) See 1st answer above. (b) She doesn't give a sh*t about the father's feelings.
4. Why were the CIA’s talking points for Susan Rice changed so early, and in such a way that the authorship of the changes could not be traced?
Because despite the pre-fab cover story, the whole thing smelled so bad that people were starting to catch on to the setup much sooner than they thought they would.
5. Why did a sleazy criminal and government informant decide to make a stupid, unwatchable movie that he knew very well (as a Copt, he could not help but know) would earn him a death fatwa across the entire globe?
For the same reason he's now conveniently incommunicado (see 1st answer above).
6. Who paid to make a movie that would expose everyone involved in its production to the risk of being murdered?
Again, look up the YT video where the guy posts his detective work on who actually put the thing together. Sorry I can't think of the name now and can't look up the link but it should still be on there.
These are all important questions but the biggest question to ask here is, Since the "spontaneous riot" lie fell apart so quickly, and since fire support for the (thankfully) disobedient SEALs was deliberately never given, what was the real purpose of the attack and do circumstances suggest the Obama admin knew it was coming...and perhaps was even involved in it?
Romney lost simply because he wasn't popular among the white working and middle-class. He got less votes than McCain who was himself very unpopular with the GOP electorate.
This is a scathing indictment of the GOP selection process that ensured only the most unpalatable person, in this case a bland vulture capitalist would get the nomination. In many ways it was a replay of the CA election with Meg Whitman and Fiorina - two plutocrats the GOP put up and got their a**es kicked. They had zero appeal.
If you look at the stats it was white working class voters who put Obama over the edge.Why? Because Romney never talked to these people who are on the receiving end of Free Trade and Off-shoring programs that have decimated them over the last 2 decades. The GOP refuses to abandon supporting these badly written trade policies that hurt the White working class.
Furthermore his support for letting the automakers die while supporting the Wall Street bailout, only cemented his loss of Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin.
Guess Romney doesn't understand what loss of vital manufacturing infrastructure is and didn't get that these 3 states are the key to winning. What a loser.
On illegal immigration, Romney was worthless even though polling shows 70% of Americans support stronger enforcement. Instead the GOP is going to pander to illegals now.
Cleaning up Wall Street - whats that?
Foreign policy - more wars.
Energy policy - a joke.
Bottom line Romney listened to a bunch of rich GOP insiders who never leave their enclaves and live in a self-referential echo chamber. Whose messages would only appeal to kool-aid drinkers.
This guaranteed he would lose a lot of the independent and lower class White vote right off the bat and he did.
Here's a tip GOP - go off and die in the gutter. It's clear you only listen to the very wealthy and connected and only care about power. You don't give a rats behind about what's really happening in the country.
I believe that the first commenter is a political plant designed to convince legitimate voters into accepting the unacceptable - which is that dead people, senile people, extremely low IQ (mentally challenged) people, drug-addicted people, foreign people, multiple-voting people, and goofy cartoon characters should decide how our ship of state is run - run into the ground!
I suppose that the first commenter also believes that Obama's forged birth certificate, multiple social security numbers (Obama and his wife have used multiple numbers. Try that trick at home and see if YOU can get away with it.), and faked selective service registration are legitimate, too, despite the fact that President Harrison J. Bounel (aka Obama based on his current social security number) is so fake that Obama should have been denied the opportunity to either run in the election or to vote for himself!
As far as the polls: The polls showed Romney ahead until Obama's minions allegedly threatened the poll takers with imminent loss of major government contract(s) - and the polls magically reversed their numbers to Obama's benefit.
If you can win straight up, then you do NOT need to cheat. Choom boy Obama cheated starting with his forged birth certificate. Yeesh!
Egghead
A couple of points, though I'm not an expert. It seemed to me that, in the run up to the election, even Obama's supporters had accepted that he was not popular, and was likely to lose the election. The BBC, usually gushingly enthusiastic for the democrat candidate, so much so that you'd think the election was being fought in this country, were uncharacteristicly subdued, unenthusiastic, they KNEW the election was lost. From what I saw, media supporters there too were of the same opinion. Then, come the election, he has a higher number of votes than at the last election ON A REDUCED TURNOUT ! That looks very fishy to me.
Secondly, there has been a lot of criticism about the lack lustre candidates fielded by the Republicans. WHAT DO YOU EXPECT ? .Any prospective Republican candidate who has the slightest vestige of voter appeal is mercilessly lambasted in the media, any faults, misdemeanour's by them or members of their family are endlessly raked over.They are subjected to continuous insult and ridicule, until, even their supporters are embarrassed to be associated with them-just look at the shameful treatment meted out to Sarah Palin and her family.
Whilst anything to embarrass the democrat candidate is not only ignored, but actively covered up. The Republicans are effectively hog tied in thier choice of candidate.
Can I make one final point. Conservatives still cling to the idea that the electoral/political process is just about how the country is run, who has the best policies, what will be the best direction for the country as a whole. Well I have news for you; the left don't see it that way AT ALL, to them YOU are the enemy of all civilisation, who must be stopped AT ANY COST, vote rigging being the least of them. They don't want to just win an election against you, their hatred is visceral. THEY WANT TO SEE YOU TOTALLY DESTROYED, ERADICATED--- FOREVER
Post a Comment