“Who Am I, Where?”
Waldviertel Akademie, Wer bin ich, wo? 03 09 bis 06 09 2009 in Weitra, NÖ
This report was compiled by ESW, with reporting by Harald Fiegl. The speaker, Dr. M-S, was also interviewed.
The Waldviertel Academy, a think tank sponsored by the ÖVP and active for the past twenty-five years, presented a conference on the topic “Who Am I, Where? — Identities, Orientation, Fear of the Future.”
The debate focused on the topic of multiculturalism, whether multicultural tolerance can be seen as a form of indifference and whether we can expect something from those who migrate to Europe.
The second day brought a heated and emotional difference of opinion, as a result of which three out of four members of the podium decided to abandon the podium in protest.
The dispute broke out because of the following group of statements:
Criticism of Islam is not a form of racism. One must never forget the lack of freedom of religion in Muslim countries as well as the lack of separation of church and state. Multiculturalism that includes Muslims thus leads to the dismantling of the European identity, which is based on Christian values.
During her speech, Dr. M-S (a member of the Akademikerbund) spoke about the fact that Islam-criticism is equated with racism, which is unacceptable because when we criticize Islam, it is Islam as a cultural phenomenon. The racist identifies the other as inherently inferior. We do not intend that, but say that Islam is a dangerous religion which endangers us here in Europe. We are thus not racists because we are not saying that Muslims are inherently inferior.
One of the members of the podium accused Dr. M-S of a being a right-wing extremist and added that he refused to sit on a podium with such a person. Because he was not given the floor as per rules of discussion, he got up and left.
- - - - - - - - -
Another member of the podium accused her of academic fundamentalism and said he was unable to identify with the notion of a European “we”-feeling. Dr. M-S in turn asked him about his own identity, to which he answered, “This question is beneath me,” got up and left, adding he would never return to this academy.
The remaining member of the podium also decided to leave and Dr. M-S was on her own.
This incident once again shows the deep rift separating Austrian society and the lack of a debate culture, which results from political dogmas.
It is interesting to note that all this took place after two members of the podium called for more truth with regard to integration matters: “Until now the official Austria has followed the politics of looking away. The Austrian Broadcasting Corporation shies away from a thorough analysis of Islamic matters.”
8 comments:
I'm not surprised. Islam always seems to be offended by something, particularly the truth.
Hahaha:
"The racist identifies the other as
inherently inferior."
Look - we just won the war!
All muslims by this definition are 100% RACISTS.
This is "stuff white people like".
I'm proud to be an INFIDEL.
If the average white man behaved like Islamist, the alledged reverend, Al Sharpton & Jesse Jackson would be shrieking. Can't you want to preserve your race and culture.
Oh! That's right;
Not if your white.
Me too is proud to be a KUFFAR!! Never will I became a dhimmi but for always remain kuffar.
Another member of the podium accused her of academic fundamentalism and said he was unable to identify with the notion of a European “we”-feeling. Dr. M-S in turn asked him about his own identity, to which he answered, “This question is beneath me,” got up and left, adding he would never return to this academy. [emphasis added]
You just gotta love that Voluntary Universal Homogenization™. The compulsion to eradicate one's own identity in the quest for that ever-elusive transnational globalized persona simply defies all logic.
Love those Muslims as much as you want, just remember that at day's end they aren't going to love you AT ALL, if they don't kill you first.
Slightly off topic: I have met Harald Fiegl personally and can testify to his deep personal concern for the future of Austria and Christian Europe in general.
All of us at Gates of Vienna are fortunate to have Elisabeth and Harald providing us with such in-depth coverage from one of jihad's front lines. I cannot thank them enough.
Lefties are unable to debate. They don't have facts or the ability to string them together in a logical argument.
Their usual armament is not allowed in a formal debate by an unbiased moderator conversant with the rules (sheer repetition of an already rebutted point, name calling, shouting, erecting straw men instead of the arguing the actual point etc.)
So all that's left to them is the "this is all beneath me" dramatic exit in high moral dudgeon.
Better that than stay on stage and be eviscerated in public. Do they ever fool anyone but themselves with their act? They run from the field of battle shouting "I'm better than you" over their shoulders LOL.
Islam brings out the worst in everyone :(
Actually, racism is just an extreme form of non-confidence. I don't have confidence in random strangers I meet on the street. Banning me from expressing this lack of confidence is not only a violation of my rights. It is also counter-productive, too, in that it prevents identifying and correcting the missing confidence.
'Correcting' in this context would mean abstaining from violence in the name of religion, for one...
Post a Comment