At the siege of Vienna in 1683 Islam seemed poised to overrun Christian Europe.
We are in a new phase of a very old war.
Thursday, March 09, 2006
What No One Is Saying About the Dubai Back-Off
There's a lot of coverage (see Junkyard Blog, here, for "Dubai Yields") of the United Emirate's decision to divest itself of its American holdings. What no one seems to be paying attention to is that the deal violates our agreement with Israel not to do business with companies that are owned by states which embargo trade with Israel.
The UAE has been doing just that for a long time: Israel is not on their list of trade buddies.
So, here we have just one more oversight of that Committee in charge of vetting foreign investments in this country.
What is wrong with Washington? Never mind -- that list is too long. Better question: what is it doing right lately?
As for DPW's decision to get out of Dodge: while late is better than never, they lost some advantage in waiting so long. It must have been a lucrative deal for them to try to wait it out...wouldn't you love to know the real story?
Hey, somebody, call Claudia Rosett; put her on this sorry mess.
3 comments:
the boycott is ineffective and nobody pays attention to it. i posted on this - with a link to an article from the jpost.
uae and dubai do lots of wuiet biz with israel.
like the rest oif this controversy this angle was totally bogus.
all the best.
Two things...first of all, for Scott, Sirius and reliapundit..the boycott is very much in force. It is against US law that makes it illegal for US companies to comply with a boycott against any US ally..including Israel.
As can be seen from this post, Dubai does not even allow israelis in the country!J O S H U A P U N D I T: No Jews need apply : Israel's Shahar Peer Not Allowed in Dubai Open
Another little tidbit is that Dubai continues to not only fund Hamas, a terrorist organization but to give funds directly to homicide bombers.
As well as the government funded Zayed Center, the source of some of the most virulent ly anti-Semitic and anti-American literature in the world.
J O S H U A P U N D I T: Is Dubai breaking another US law and providing material support to a terrorist group?
What was that again about being against those who harbor terrorism, Dubbya? Kinda makes a mockery of the Bush Doctrine, no?
Perhaps if the Preident had properly briefed Congressional leaders about the quid pro quo Bush offered the UAE for this deal, that might have been one thing..but he simply tried to shove it through, and it looks like that was a major error on his part.
If you read freedomfighter's comment, he undercut's Dymphna's statement that:
"...the deal violates our agreement with Israel not to do business with companies that are owned by states which embargo trade with Israel."
That's not the basis of our agreement at all. Furthermore, what does the actual agreement have to do with the ports deal? Do you imagine the ports would be permitted to discriminate in employment on US shores?
US companies are not forbidden form doing business with Arab companies - nor should they be.
The boycott idea was a transparently late addition to the "case" against the deal - opposition that was largely based on misinformation, political posturing and wildfire rumors.
There's been a lot of ugly talk on this topic - "Conservatives" accusing the president of selling out. People need to get a grip.
Post a Comment