Last night Tommy Robinson, the leader of the English Defence League, was invited to a meeting with Home Secretary Theresa May. The invitation did not come from the Home Secretary herself, but rather from a constituent who had arranged a meeting with her, and invited Mr. Robinson along for the occasion. The EDL leader took the opportunity to speak to Mrs. May about the deficiencies of Britain’s immigration policy and the government’s outrageous demonization of the EDL.
The Home Office has recently suffered a series of embarrassing revelations, including last week’s headlines reporting that the government had shelled out £60 million in grants to prevent “extremism”, but gave the money to radical Islamic organizations that support terrorism. This came on the heels of the release of the latest immigration figures, which are at a record high, despite the coalition government’s promise to change course on immigration.
So Mrs. May has a lot on her mind these days, and is already having to negotiate a political minefield, even without finding the EDL on her doorstep.
She seems to have panicked after learning that Channel 4 had had a video crew on the scene and taped Tommy Robinson’s arrival at the meeting. Her media team hurried to feed its own spin to the press, and The Daily Mail slavishly provided just what was required, under the headline “Theresa May ambushed at constituency meeting”:
Theresa May was last night dramatically ambushed at a constituency meeting by the head of the far-right English Defence League.
The Home Secretary fears the group — whose marches she has banned in the past — will now seek to exploit the face-to-face confrontation for a propaganda coup.
The self-proclaimed head of the EDL, who normally gives his name as ‘Tommy Robinson’, managed to by-pass security checks by posing as the companion of one of Mrs May’s constituents.
He then began haranguing the Home Secretary about why the EDL — whose demonstrations have been marred by violence — was treated differently to other groups.
Mrs May says she walked away from the exchange in Maidenhead Town Hall — which comes ahead of a planned local march in the town by the EDL today.
Normally, the leader of a known extremist organisation would have no chance of getting near to the Home Secretary.
She told the Mail: ‘My concern now is that he will try to make something of it, which he should not do. He did not have a meeting with me — I was completely door stepped. I did not even recognise him.
‘This is a group whose purpose is to divide and to encourage hatred in our society and I condemn them for that.’
One concern is the group may claim to have formally met Mrs May, in a bid to gain some political legitimacy.
The interesting thing about all this is that the Home Secretary considers it imperative to distance herself from a dedicated and popular patriotic organization that shares the same ostensible goals as her own government — at least the “Conservative” half of it. Why label the EDL “extremists”, and thereby imply an equivalence with Hizb ut-Tahrir, Islam4UK, etc.?
What advantage do the Tories gain by smearing the EDL?
The English Defence League’s website has its own take on last night’s events:
Sham Policy to Address Islamism Exposed by the English Defence League
Tommy Robinson, Leader of the English Defence League (EDL), has exposed David Cameron’s apparent ‘get tough’ policy towards Islamism as a complete sham. People can now see the real approach of the Conservative led regime with regard to defending the British people against the Islamist threat.
We have heard much talk recently about how the Conservatives will be getting tough on Islamic extremism in Britain. Many people in Britain were heartened by David Cameron’s recent tough and realistic rhetoric on the subject, but an article recently posted on the Daily Mail website indicates a marked shift in Government and Conservative Party policy on this matter. Far from being serious about dealing with the problem of Islamism in Britain, the Conservative Party seems to be adopting the failed and hugely damaging policy of the previous Labour Government. Can the Conservative Party ever be trusted to deal with Islamism and the serious threat that it poses to our national security and democratic way of life? Perhaps their ‘hard line’ has been vetoed by the Lib Dems?
The political climb-down on dealing with Islamism rigorously and realistically has been exposed as nothing more than sham political window dressing. The policy reversal came shortly after EDL leader, Tommy Robinson, put the Home Secretary Theresa May on the spot and asked her some very direct and pertinent questions on the subject. It seems that Channel 4 television cameras recorded Mr Robinson entering and leaving the meeting which meant that the Home Secretary could not deny the exchange of views with the EDL leader. Fearing a propaganda coup by the EDL the Conservative Party has appeared to have fallen back into its usual ‘tree-hugger’ mode.
At least the initiative of Mr Robinson has exposed David Cameron’s rhetoric for what it is — words and not deeds. It would appear that he has no intention what-so-ever of dealing with the Islamist threat to our democracy. It seems likely, therefore, that the well established and disastrous policy of appeasement will continue into the future.
Was the Government’s previous rhetoric merely a response to the growing support enjoyed by the English Defence League amongst ordinary Britons and an attempt to appear to be listening to their concerns? The Conservative Party perhaps thought that it could reduce the appeal of the EDL by duping people into believing that the political mainstream could get Islamism under control. In the end it is apparent that only grass roots groups like the EDL have a realistic grasp of the situation and that any belief that the political mainstream can address the issue has now evaporated. The message is clear, the Conservative Party is incapable of formulating policies to keep Britain secure from the threat posed by Islamism and has now lost all credibility on the issue. Whenever it talks tough on Islamism it is just talk, and always will be.
David Cameron once said ‘the EDL are terrible people’ but did not elaborate and say why he chose to demonise the whole cross section of the British public that make up EDL ranks…
Read the rest at the EDL website.
Theresa May and her fellow Conservatives obviously failed to read El Inglés’ recent analysis, which pointed out that any political actors who waffle and equivocate now on the immigration issue will have no hope of gaining traction later on, when the hammer finally drops.
That moment is closer than most people realize, and will certainly arrive well within the active careers of most of the major players. Their handling of the immigration crisis reflects poorly on their political acumen.
Or do they know something we don’t know?
Hat tips: Kitman and Aeneas.
8 comments:
Is Cameron doing multi-million dollar speaking engagements in Islamofascist states like Billary Clintonista?
That might explain his attitude towards islamofascism.
‘This is a group whose purpose is to divide and to encourage hatred in our society and I condemn them for that.’
And yet the quisling British leaders keep the road wide open for the true haters and their religion which worships death.
Now why would Western leaders go out of their way to appease the evil,intolerant,bloodthirsty cult of death,Islam and work so hard against those who fight for the survival of the West from such an undemocratic EVIL religion ?
Job 12 This is judgment day against the west who turned away from God.
'He makes nations great, and destroys them, He enlarges nations, and guides them.
He takes away the understanding of the chiefs of the people of the earth,And makes them wander in a pathless wilderness.
They grope in the dark without light,And He makes them stagger like a drunken man.'
The projected future is becoming more clear for native europeans; Islam threatens your very survival. Fight now by every means for your life.
"Far from being serious about dealing with the problem of Islamism in Britain, the Conservative Party seems to be adopting the failed and hugely damaging policy of the previous Labour Government"
The fact of the matter is (nu)Labour adopted the policy from the previous Conservative government and accelerated that immigration policy hence Andrew Neather's "rub the Right's nose in diversity" ride and tie governments.
The Conservative government of the eighties used immigration to drive down wages this reduced the indigenous unskilled worker to nothing more than a slave.
"It is a practice in some parts of the country, when two travellers have but one horse, which, [...], will not carry double, that the one mounts and rides two or three miles ahead, and then ties the horse to a gate and walks on. When the second traveller arrives he takes the horse, rides on, and passes his companion a mile or two, and ties again, and so on- Ride and tie." - Thomas Paine.
In hoc signo vinces, so can I borrow your car if I leave you a bus pass?
The government are desperate to conceal the truth about the Islamification of Britain from the electorate. Therefore they cannot afford to debate with the EDL, they therefore simply smear them as violent extremists.
@an EDL buck,
"so can I borrow your car if I leave you a bus pass?"
Sorry no can do, wrecked the car the other day!
I believe since Tommy Robinson stated in a television interview that the EDL had no political asperations the government believes the eternal class system in Britain is not under threat by what they percieve as the indigenous fodder. Thus they only need to distance themselves from the EDL and hope the organization withers on the vine. The political class is so delusional that they think media perception can determine the reality in the street. By doing exactly the opposite of what the secretary expected they continualy expose the incompetence of the political system. Lets hope that when the hammer finally drops the English not only end Islam but the whole social class structure there. Geez.. other european countries did it a long time ago.
Post a Comment
All comments are subject to pre-approval by blog admins.
Gates of Vienna's rules about comments require that they be civil, temperate, on-topic, and show decorum. For more information, click here.
Users are asked to limit each comment to about 500 words. If you need to say more, leave a link to your own blog.
Also: long or off-topic comments may be posted on news feed threads.
To add a link in a comment, use this format:
<a href="http://mywebsite.com">My Title</a>
Please do not paste long URLs!
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.