Why Is This Not Treason?
by Paul Weston
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague. — Cicero
On the 3rd of January 1946, William Joyce, better known as Lord Haw-Haw, was the last man in Britain to be hanged for the ancient crime of treason. Unless a future government changes the law it is unlikely that traitors will ever dangle again, after Tony Blair rather conveniently repealed the death penalty for such a crime in 1998.
That is not to say treason no longer exists. Now the full extent of Labour’s thirteen-year rule has become apparent, an increasing number of Britons are volubly accusing the Labour Party of wilfully and cold-bloodedly betraying Britain and deliberately jeopardising our children’s future.
Lord Haw-Haw of course sided with the Nazis during the hot war of 1939-1945. The recent Labour government might not have been operating in a hot-war theatre, but they certainly carried out a warm-war against the British (principally the English) via mass immigration from one of the most hostile and anti-Western countries in the world, Pakistan.
Consider some of the following statistics:
- Only nineteen percent of Pakistanis have a negative view of Al Qaeda and by default the Taliban, whilst seventy-five percent wish to see Sharia law implemented. British-born Muslims make an estimated four hundred thousand trips a year to Pakistan, where as many as thirty threats against Britain are being monitored at any given time.
- Thirty-three percent of Muslim students in Britain think killing in the name of Islam is permissible. Only thirty-seven percent oppose the introduction of Sharia law and only twenty-five percent oppose the creation of a worldwide Muslim caliphate.
- MI5 believe there are up to four thousand potential terrorists and thirteen thousand Al Qaeda sympathisers living in Britain. The CIA devotes an astonishing forty percent of their anti-terrorist homeland security operations against suspects not in Afghanistan or Waziristan, but in Britain itself — a country described by one CIA operative as “a swamp of Jihadis.”
- Barack Obama’s counter-terrorist advisor Bruce Riedel recently stated: “The British Pakistani community is recognised as probably Al Qaeda’s best mechanism for launching an attack against North America.”
All in all then, it would seem less than prudent to allow any more bearded ideologues into Britain, yet the Labour government — and this must sound quite insane to most people — actually went to the extraordinary lengths of advertising for foreign colonisers from the very same country the Home Office was paying Danegeld to in a typically limp-wristed appeal to stop it from blowing us up.
The British Embassy in Pakistan distributed glossy pamphlets entitled “Multicultural Britain — a Land of Immigrants” which gave a raft of arguments as to the benefits of living in Britain such as well paid jobs, plain old welfare, and the prospect of inviting over the entire extended family (sans goat) once a British passport had been acquired.
And of course there was the rather unpleasant — nay, treacherous — implication that there was no such thing as a homogenous Britain, no such place as an English homeland, just an indeterminate area of land settled by a vague mongrel collection of disparate peoples including any number of rag-tag colonial racists awaiting divine racial redemption from those they once oppressed.
So desperate were the Labour traitors to destroy Britain that, having secured power, they immediately carried out two political acts which could only place our peaceful future in doubt. The Human Rights Convention was immediately incorporated into British law and immigration rules were relaxed to allow an open-door policy of mass Muslim immigration.
A few thousand people who could gently assimilate were of little use to the Labour government. To ensure the success of their revolutionary plan, they urgently needed inassimilable millions and were quite prepared to deceive the British public about the real number of Muslim immigrants — and the real reasons Tony Blair wanted them in Britain.
And once the floodgates were opened, it became supremely important not to turn anybody away. Of the 2 million visas issued every year, fifteen percent of them were “processed” when they should not have been in order to hit “productivity targets,” with immigration officials placed under intense political pressure to issue visas rather than reject them.
One man who took advantage of Blair’s treachery was Abu Baseer, the spiritual advisor to Ansar ul-Islam, a jihadist organisation linked to Al Qaeda. Baseer was originally based in Iraq prior to settling in West London, from where he issues various fatwas calling for death to British soldiers and the overthrow of the West. He had this to say on the subject of immigration:
“One of the goals of immigration is the revival of the duty of jihad and enforcement of power over the infidels. Immigration and jihad go together. One is the consequence of the other and dependent upon it. The continuance of the one is dependent upon the continuance of the other.”
The next stage in Labour’s war against Britain and its indigenous people was to make sure the foreign colonisers maintained their 7th century ideology and customs through a curious yet highly effective liberal process called “multiculturalism.” This guaranteed their non-assimilation and thus provided Tony Blair and his friends with a hostile and ever-growing tool with which to incrementally erode traditional Britain.
Despite the obvious violence that emanates from massed Muslims wherever they are in the world, the Labour government went to great lengths to portray Islam as The Religion of Peace, even as Christianity was mocked and defiled, and decent, moral and patriotic Britons were re-cast and criminalised as Islamophobic, race-hating Nazis.
Not even our children were safe from Tony Blair’s thought police. The propaganda arms of the BBC and the state educational service tried to convince our children that their race, culture, religion and history consisted only of genocide, racism and evil. The spectre of Adolf Hitler was also constantly invoked with the quite deliberate intention of linking any resistance to the religious and ethnic colonisation of Britain with the actions and ideology of the Nazis.
And while third-world immigration continued apace, the Labour Party lied to cover up the attendant serial catastrophes. We were told that they were peaceful, that they committed little crime and that they were a benefit to the economy. None of this was true, as detailed by the exposure of Labours’ various lies and distortions, which showed a negative cost to the economy and a disproportionate level of crime including rape and murder — and of course, terrorism.
Nine out of ten new jobs were taken by immigrants, along with eighty-five percent of new housing. Muslims are grossly over-represented within Britain’s jails and within Britain’s welfare state, which supports fifty percent of Muslim males and seventy-five percent of females who reproduce like belt-fed mortars rather than going out to work.
To further bolster the Muslim demographics, Britain’s laws against polygamy were overlooked in the case of Islam. Muslim males could thus legally amass four imported wives, twenty to thirty children and a large house (or houses) in which to raise them, all paid for by the Labour state — right down to the satellite dish tuned into the various sources of jihad beamed direct from the East.
Only two out of three babies born in Britain today are classified as white British. Twenty percent of mothers are first generation immigrants, and a further twenty-five percent second or third generation immigrants. The idea that there are only 2.4 million Muslims in Britain is therefore ridiculous. There is strong evidence to suggest the numbers could be somewhere between 5-10 million.
The welfare-funded Muslim birth-rate has already rendered English children a minority in many city schools. In London, white school children now enter their first year as an ethnic minority. Figures from the Office of National Statistics suggest that British people of all ages will become a minority by 2066 with the young becoming a minority far earlier, and the young English earlier still.
These apocalyptic figures led Professor David Coleman of Oxford University to state that the transition of white Britons to a minority was likely to be: “unwelcome… and would represent an enormous change to national identity — cultural, political, economic and religious”.
Professor Coleman is quite right, but what is scarcely believable is that these enormous changes were precisely what the Labour Party had in mind in 1997. This was made apparent when Peter Hitchens recounted his dismay regarding a fellow hack who jumped ship in order to work for the Labour Party:
“I asked him why he had done this awful thing. He replied: you have no idea at all just how enormous the New Labour Project really is.”
Other people were all too aware of the size and direction of the Labour Party juggernaut, but still managed to hold onto their naiveté as to its ultimate destination, which appears to be the cultural and racial eradication of the English people. This genocidal policy was explained by Tony Blair’s speech-writer Andrew Neather in 2010, when he rather foolishly came out with the following treasonous nuggets:
‘It didn’t just happen: the deliberate policy of ministers from late 2000 until at least February last year was to open up the UK to mass migration… to make the UK truly multicultural…the policy was intended to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date… this shone through even in the published report: the “social outcomes” it talks about are solely those for immigrants’
There were two main reasons for such treachery. The first was held by Labour’s minority hard-left who wanted to destroy utterly the hated traditional establishment, and in this respect they had no choice but to declare war on their own people. To the hard-left, the enemy was the conservative, Christian, capitalist West of liberal-democracy Western civilisation — or, in other words, the majority of the English.
The second reason, held perhaps by the majority of Labour apparatchiks, was to ensure a socialist government in perpetuity via the imported foreign vote. Research into voting patterns conducted for The Electoral Commission in May 2005 showed that Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshis voted 56%, 50% and 41% for Labour. The equivalent figures for the Conservatives were 11%, 11% and 9%
The Labour Party has form with this kind of gerrymandering. Ex-Communist Peter Mandelson’s grandfather, Herbert Morrison, who was Labour’s Deputy Prime Minister between 1945-1951, came up with the novel idea of constructing soviet-style concrete tower-blocks for the working-class to live in who would subsequently vote Labour and thus “build the f*****g Tories (Conservatives) out of London.”
Tony Blair simply took it a stage further, and imported a “vigorously encouraged to feel oppressed class” from foreign climes to serve as cultural destroyers / Labour bloc-voters. This is a subtle re-working of Bertolt Brecht’s comment in the wake of East Berlin’s 1953 bread riots, when he suggested: “Wouldn’t it be simpler for the government to dissolve the people and elect another?”
Who would have thought this would one day apply to “democratic” Britain where the indigenous people are not so much being dissolved as replaced, and where “population replacement” is simply a more refined way of saying ethnic cleansing?
It was James Burnham who first coined the phrase “Suicide of the West”, but this is not a majority-ordained suicide. It is a minority-controlled murderous genocide. Let me be very clear about this: Tony Blair and the Labour Party declared war on their own people, and there is (as yet) no substantive reason to believe we can survive this century, let alone the long term.
The point of war is not about fighting and shooting and storming and gung-hoing; it is about gaining physical territory and taking political control of the defeated territory and its people. This is exactly what is slowly but surely happening to the English.
And because it is happening so slowly, many people are unaware of the situation. If a man is injected with a fast acting poison and dies minutes later, he has clearly been murdered. But is it not still murder if the poison were slow acting and allowed the man to live another twenty years?
It is the act of injection, knowing the consequences, which makes it murder, and Tony Blair injected Britain with a lethal cocktail of fast-breeding inassimilable aliens in the full and calculated knowledge that the country and its indigenous people would be incrementally destroyed as a result.
We can see this destruction today. Vulnerable girls in Northern towns were groomed and raped by Pakistanis for over eight years without any recrimination. The police simply pretended nothing untoward was happening. Much the same happened in Berlin in the mid 1930s to the Jews, who suffered tremendous persecution that was subsequently ignored by the authorities.
In London, entire areas are slowly coming under Islamic control. Tower Hamlets is now lost to the West as Jews, women and homosexuals are persecuted whilst English street names and the few remaining whites are systematically replaced. Soon to be lost, if indeed they are not already lost are Luton, Bradford, Oldham, Birmingham, Leicester, etc. Fjordman calls this Beheading Nations and asks the following question:
“Less attention has been paid to the fact that Muslims are beheading entire nation states. Although this is happening in slow motion, it is no less dramatic. Historically, the major cities have constituted a country’s ‘head’ the seat of most of its political institutions and the largest concentration of its cultural brainpower. What happens when this “head” is cut off from the rest of the body?”
When our racial / religious society cedes territory to a rival society, then we are losing a battle. When the state enacts laws to reward the aggressive incomer and to penalise the passive native, then we are losing a battle. When our children are brainwashed into the belief that they are evil and worthy only of displacement, then we are losing a battle. When our women and children are raped and abused whilst the state remains silent, then we are losing a battle.
And when finally we become too defeated even to breed whilst we pay the aggressor to demographically swamp us, then we have not just lost a battle, we are in the midst of losing a war, our homeland, and our civilisation. We are rapidly on our way to extinction.
We have been betrayed. Tony Blair and the Labour Party have committed treason. The British people were never asked if they wished Muslim immigrants to colonise Britain in such large numbers that it constituted invasion. Had they been asked they would have replied with a resounding No!
Although lawyers may argue over the precise meaning of the word “treason”, everyone else understands it only too well, including Tony Blair, which (along with the EU sell-out) is presumably why he repealed the treason laws. The Labour government was elected to represent the best interests of the British people, not those of Mirpur.
It does not really matter whether the third world was imported for revolutionary or electoral gain. All that matters is that Tony Blair’s Labour Party systematically allied itself with the massed imported ideologues of the Western world’s most persistent historical aggressor, and actively sided against Britain and the British people.
Rather than sign off with a furious tirade about the severe recrimination traitors should endure, I will leave you instead with a calm yet deeply poignant quote from Alex Henshaw, chief test-pilot for Vickers Armstrong during the Second World War. Despite test-flying ten percent of all Spitfires during their development stage, Mr Henshaw survived the war and lived a long life before dying in 2007:
“I feel extreme emotional sadness for the young men I knew that gave their lives willingly for a cause in which we all believed. And I often say to myself now if those young boys would come down now and walk through the villages, through the towns and through the cities and look around and see what is happening to us, they would say somewhere along the line we have been betrayed.”
Yes, Mr Henshaw. I am afraid you have.
Previous posts by Paul Weston:
35 comments:
Allowing Pakistanis into the UK was the equivalent of inviting ants and bears to a picnic, with similar predictable results.
Dr. Shalit
Baha'i unity in diversity.
Shonghi effendi is smiling in his London grave.
Because Tony Blair secretly repealed the treason laws, hidden in the Crime and Disorder Act, and the Queen signed it in 1998, saving both their necks.
Next question?
Don't forget the introduction of postal balloting, which can only have been done with the intention of facilitating Muslim vote fraud. At every stage in its introduction, the Labour party ignored the severe warnings that were issued about its vulnerability to fraud. They swept aside suggestions about how this vulnerability could be reduced. It is clear that they saw its fraud-friendly nature as desirable.
I think it's a mistake to see what happened under the Labour party as anything other than an intensification of processes that were already very significantly underway, however. It was predictable that as the third world presence in Britain grew, it would acquire growing electoral influence, effectively, in the end, "capturing" major political parties.
The real betrayal was much further back. I'm reading "Like the Roman", the biography of Enoch Powell, at the moment. Some of Powell's remarks, made in the 60s and 70s, about how free speech on the topic of immigration was being regimented and controlled sound eerily contemporary.
It may be that the only way out of this is violence; violence either when the civil war breaks out with the Muslims; or the violence of a terrorist group that would defend the interests of the European people. Perhaps if the politicians were faced with a terrorist group that defended the European peoples' right to life, they would begin to defer to that sentiment, just as they have shown indulgence to the Muslims in response to jihadist terrorism.
However, political developments on the continent give us grounds for hope. Insurgent counterjihadist parties are flourishing in many countries. In Britain, though, there is nothing, partly due to the rigidities of the electoral system. UKIP is the closest thing we have but its potential is unrealised due to its leaders' cowardice and narrowness of vision.
If a Counterjihad party takes power somewhere in Europe, the force of its example may inspire change throughout the continent. Marine Le Pen has a reasonable chance of winning in France next year; and the FPO is also doing well in Austria.
And yet, despite all of this, despite war in Iraq, the man won THREE general elections. That will be a tough one for future historians or should I say scientists, because I think it's obvious such unlimited irrationality cannot be explained solely by history and historians.
Let us not forget that Cameron has done absolutely nothing to undo any of this damage. Both him and Blair were puppets, someone else is pulling their strings. They merely do what they have been told (?at Davos?).
One problem is that the distinction between supposed traitors and patriots is not so well defined. All the conservatives do is slow down the “invasion,” not stop it or reverse it. Aren’t they also traitors?
Great essay. The comparison between modern Britain and Nazi Germany does well to drive the point home. However, modern Britain is worse as the police turning their gaze aside are of the local stock, whereas in Nazi Germany the police were not Jews working on their own.
But the most frightning thing about all this,for me anyway as a member of this "vague mongrel collection of disparate peoples".Latest polls now show Labour to be leading!!http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/ Not that i take much notice of these polls,but the fact is,Labour came second in last years general election.I'm sorry but i simply do not believe this,anyone with only half of a brain can see the damage these treachorous vermin have caused over the last thirteen years,yet somehow they still come a close second in a recent general election!I think Something is desperately wrong here and needs to be investigated but by who??
Trev: It is not an investigation that is called for, but more like a mass deprogramming effort for the entire white population.
I agree, the absurdity of the whole situation is so huge, it defies human intelligence. I don't believe in conspiracy theories, because it's simply impossible for ordinary humans to organize a conspiracy (or even treason) so successful and irrational at the same time.
I do believe Mr. Blair did all of this, because he was truly convinced that he is doing something GOOD for the UK. When a human being does something which he knows is evil in itself, the conscience catches up with him sooner or later. But when he does something he believes is GOOD - there are no such constraints and he can do much more damage in the long run.
Hitler also believed he did everything for the benefit of the Third Reich and in doing so, he ultimately brought Germany to the brink of almost total destruction, making absurder and absurder decisions as he progressed along that way. Despite that, whole nation, all his generals and closest cronies expected miracles from him right to the very end, even begging him to escape from Berlin, so that the whole disaster can be prolonged a few more days.
Hal K:"A mass deprogramming effort for the entire white population" is exactly what the Labour government has done,and is now being carried on by the Conservative,Liberal coalition,they are all reading from the the same leftist,suicidal,guidebook to oblivian,and being steered in that direction by the enemy within.@Vortac:I agree with you that this whole situation hasent occured by some sort of a preconcieved conspiracy from the beginning.But along the line our politics have been infiltrated by an Islamic movement that knew dammned well how easy it would be to do so.Because the human rights laws that we now have implemented will allways protect them.Basically,if a billion muslims decide to invade Europe(wich is exactly what they are doing as we speak)Then there is'nt dammn thing we can do about it.
sorry for my grammar.
So what the hell do we do Paul? You joined the UKIP and I joined the BNP. Both proved useless.
Is there a possibility of forming an Anti-Treason Alliance of Independents? Do you have any suggestions as to what exactly we should do, considering the Conservatives are utterly compromised too? I think we can safely forget the Lib Dhimmis.
Be very cautious not to fall into the political quicksand of believing that mass immigration into the U.K. was exclusively the specter of one particularly government, though this was an obvious acceleration of immigration into the U.K. it was not the start of the mass socioeconomic immigration into the U.K. and it is most definitely not the end, had enough of mass immigration now rub your nose in good immigration.
Culpability extends across the mainstream parties and consecutive British governments. A culpability concealed behind parochial and superficial red/blue political elite stage combat and grandstanding over immigration.
Thanks for posting this, Baron.
I don't believe this came entirely from Tony BLiar. The idiot prince of Wales is a closet Muslim who sucks up to the Arabs and wants to be 'defender of the faiths' which means there is nothing to defend anymore. The Archdhimmi of Canterbury openly comes out in support of sharia law, sacking Bishop Nazir Ali who is a staunch opponent and a warner against the Islamization of Britain. Jack Straw is on record stating that the English race is not worth saving, and everybody, I means just about everybody in a position of power sings along.
The greatest tragedy of our time.
I think England is cooked. This is beyond treason.
Rivers of blood anybody?
Its inevitable.
Paul
I would be interested in your thoughts on how we are to avoid civil war and a political way forward.
I do not believe we have a credible party in the UK at the moment. Are you still involved with UKIP or politically active in any way?
I would like to join and and get involved with a political party that I will not end up losing my job/career over. Perhaps GoV readers can help draft a manifesto!
One thing I disagree with is singling out Tony Bliar. I think all of the post war Prime Ministers are culpable along with Her Majesty the Queen.
So many are involved we would soon run out of lamposts!
To avoid the descent into internecine violence, political tribalism and totalitarianism in England, quite literally go to Church, this is the only Estate that can wield political force without upping the ante in short capture the bishop and invest poitical power in that Estate.
"I would be interested in your thoughts on how we are to avoid civil war and a political way forward."
I'm not sure it's desirable to avoid civil war. Civil war may actually be a good thing at this point; if it can be started reasonably quickly, we will win it. That may allow an informal solution to the problem. There are signs in Greece of anti-immigrant rioting where law and order is breaking down, for example.
If the economic crisis continues to aggravate, when Greece eventually defaults for example, we may see a wholesale breakdown of the machinery of government. That moment has great potential.
@Cheradenine Zakalwe,
The prelude to internecine and the breakup of the multikulti British State may have already been witnessed in the 2011 election results to the Scottish Parliament where 3 of the 4 mainstream multikulti parties were wiped out.
The movement of votes to the Scottish National Party (S.N.P.) was highly significant not for where that vote shifted to but that it did shift. The nationalist pretenders of the multikulti S.N.P. are now running scared of the very real SCOTTISH NATIONALIST vote. The question is how much can the S.N.P. conspire with the multikulti British State to dilute what at root is an anti-multikulti and anti-ultraliberal movement.
Unfortunately, the recent election in Scotland resulted in two Muslim members of the Scottish parliament. They weren't elected; they were appointed through the regional list system. One has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.
Humza Yousaf an S.N.P. party piece not so much Comic Relief more Islamic Relief to remind the 79 Group of their socialist credentials, that their nationalism is spelt with a small n and with the unionists tongue firmly in the cheek.
The next few months will be telling will there be a battle between the nominal nationalists and the capital nationalists within the S.N.P.
This will depend on how competent their party machine was at weeding out capital nationalists or will it take the Scottish electorate to again force the political agenda.
Ultimately if the entitlement elite can be defeated and the capital nationalists win, in time islam and the likes of Hanzala Malik (Labour) and Humza Yousaf (SNP) will be purged and excluded from Scottish affairs.
@meccano
Now that Nigel Farage has replaced the admirable Islamic realist Lord Pearson, I can no longer view UKIP as a possible party of resistance.
If we are to avoid religious war in 15-20 years time, then Britain needs a new party with a manifesto similar to Geert Wilders Freedom Party.
Setting up such a party would be very complicated (security, finance etc) but I feel it is only a matter of time before someone takes the bull by the horns, possibly even this year.
I think you're all missing the point when it comes to the 'architects' of the west's destruction.
The answer lies here: http://irishsavant.blogspot.com/2010/12/our-most-improtant-issue-relations-with.html
Meccano said: "I would be interested in your thoughts on how we are to avoid civil war and a political way forward."
Is Civil war to be feared or is it the sole remaining "political" way forward. Perhaps it's not to be feared, but called for.
Do the English have it in them to fight, even a portion of them, or will they just turn the island over to the Mullah's with a shrug and smile?
From where I sit it looks like surrender is the only option. Sadly the British "men" allowed themselves to be comprehensively disarmed by their woman folk, and I include the politicians of both genders in that category.
no doubt its been done. Its been done in the UK, France, all of Europe, the US, Australia, Canada... But what to do now? if we mention it we are 'conspiracy nuts' or 'racist' amazing how a little intimidation (threatening of job loss, etc) can make people so blind to reality. I have sent people links like this, stories about sex grooming of white girls by Asians, they just shrug their shoulders.
What do we do in a society where a crazy muslim who never should have been in the army in the first place shoots up a fort while screaming Allah, and the first thing the pentegon says is 'it would be a shame to lose all this diversity"
We're in a madhouse.. what do we do?
@Paul Weston
I think you are right about Farage, and I understand there is dissent among the UKIP rank and file.
A new party possibly this year is that a hint?
My concern is that if we have to start a new political party from scratch we will run out of time.
Would an alliance of some sort be preferable? Something to unite dissafected tories, labour voters and classical liberals like yourself, along with those in the edl and those who have voted bnp in sheer desperation?
We need a movement that is neither left nor right wing but Islamorealist, Anti-EU, honest about the negative impact of mass immigration and for the preservation of the Nation State, without the holocaust denying baggage of Griffin's bnp. The movement would need to endorse Liberal Parliamentary Democracy along with equality for all under the law but at the same time reject PCMC. It should offer voters referenda on several issues including withdrawl from the EU and capital punishment but always remain within the acceptable narrative that the MSM has set.
It would then have to get some newspaper editors/columnists on side (Leo McKinstry/ Melanie Phillips??) or at least to stop them being hostile to its aims (as they currently are to the edl).
I don't think this is impossible, The Daily Express are now in favour of the UK leaving the EU.
Incedentally the bnp are in complete meltdown which is a shame as it would be useful to a credible alternative political movement such as ours, that they are retained as the establishment's favourite unelectable whipping boys, and to keep the nutzis away from our movement.
Barron
would it be possible to start up a new thread to encourage discussion and the flow of ideas for a stategy focusing on the UK for the establishment of such a populist movement?
Sadly I think the solution has gone beyond votes now.
The only solution now, is force.
The enemy isn`t at the gates,They are inside and we better act soon or all is lost.
Would you hesitate to stamp out a small fire in your house? Of course not.
Well, our house is on fire and we must now act with vigour and resolve.
As regards Blairs scramble to rescind the death penalty for Treason after his successful election in 1997, there is no reason why an incoming ethnonationalist regime cannot reinstate the death penalty - retroactively, if necessary.
After all, the Marxist New Labour Party took it upon itself and is still doing so, to usurp our British Constitution on every front possible and even abolish its edicts altogether where and when it can get away with it.
All an ethnonationalist regime has to do is to declare such treacherous acts treasonist and seditious, and then rightfully and lawfully reinforce the said Constitution including all of its edicts which includes the death penalty - invariably by hanging or decapitation.
The death penalty, once enforced for Treason, can then be extended to non-political capital crimes too.
What is needed is a front political party, but it must be Europe-wide at least for the time being.
The European Union entity will prove to be extremely useful from an ethnonationalist perspective, if not downright essential, in fact.
What I mean to say is that the Marxist- dominated project running affairs at present shall be brought to its knees and its apparatchiks rounded up to face trial.
It IS absolutely imperative that they be charged with crimes against humanity, ie, indigenous Europeans and their fellow diaspora across the world with Communism, in this instance, Marxism as an ideology also criminalized and put on trial.
Let us not forget that Nazism suffered this fate, but Communism has as yet escaped it.
The new leaders of White nations must disassociate with that other dangerous anti-White and anti-Western civilization New World Order nation-destroying instrument,
the United Nations.
After all, this nest of vipers is overrun with non-White nations who both hate and envy the West, most especially its founders who happen to be European peoples. We all know too well, the implications of this hate and envy, and must act accordingly.
The vast majority of ancestral European homelands incorporate an ancient constitution of one kind or another and these must be resurrected and then incapsulated into a temporary Europe-wide constitution that protects all European countries and its indigenous peoples including Eastern European countries.
Later, when national sovereignty has been recovered such a temporary arrangement could then be dissolved although it would be prudent to leave its temporary implementation capability on the statute book so to speak as an added safeguard for the future.
You state "Thirty-three percent of Muslim students in Britain think killing in the name of Islam is permissible."
I would reword that as follows:
"Thirty-three percent of Muslim students in Britain ADMIT to thinking that killing in the name of Islam is permissible."
The number who actually think that without admitting it in a survey MAY be vastly greater.
Best way forward is to turn off the tv.
In Hoc' states go to church. I would agree with him , but the cof e is now a marxist organisation. Don't laugh. The social marxist orthodoxy the pervades the rest of the establishments has not missed the Church. I have been hectored by man hating anti British communists from the pulpit in my own parish. The church needs brave clergy too like the rest of the establishment, and there is a deep loathing of the BCP and the thou shalt nots.
I'm in no doubt that Blair wanted to bring England crashing down, the question is, why? Was it something that happened at Fettes, his Scots
Private School, or a general feeling of inferiority to the English? Why do I think of Lenin when I muse on why Blair did this dirty deed? He was
another twisted bastard.
There are numerous reasons why a society would invite multiculturalism, not the least of which is economic growth and a moral sense of sharing the good life. The Anglos, Saxons, Celts, Vikings, Romans ... Britain has adapted to change from Day 1. Why do you now consider the white Anglo Saxon race the be-all-and-the-end-all? Logic and genetic science indicate that the human race of the future will be various shades of skin-tone, primarily of brown. I believe that politicians are motivated by good intentions and not by self-destruction. Albeit, you know what they say about good intentions -- some things will work out, some will not. As responsible citizens we must remain diligent. Silence is consent.
Gentlemen. We are teetering on the brink of an unimaginary precipice. Short of mass civil unrest, I fail to see how the institutional treachery of government, monarchy, mass media, banking, religion and corporate entities can be overcome. Let us not be naive however - mass immigration is only a part of the masterplan. Think about this - every country in the world is in massive debt, but still able to secure huge loans. From whom ?? Answer that question and you will know who really runs the show. Blair,Cameron,Merkel,Obama - they are mere gauleiters and not the principle players. It makes no odds which party holds power, they are all following the same agenda. Check out Bilderberg/Bohemian Grove and see what conclusions you come to. The enemy is not only here, it is entrenched and has infiltrated every branch of government, the judiciary - in fact every edifice which glues our society together. Question is, what can right thinking people realistically do to counter-attack ?
Post a Comment
All comments are subject to pre-approval by blog admins.
Gates of Vienna's rules about comments require that they be civil, temperate, on-topic, and show decorum. For more information, click here.
Users are asked to limit each comment to about 500 words. If you need to say more, leave a link to your own blog.
Also: long or off-topic comments may be posted on news feed threads.
To add a link in a comment, use this format:
<a href="http://mywebsite.com">My Title</a>
Please do not paste long URLs!
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.