But the girls’ father, aided by the Christian community, did not give up hope, and appealed the decision to a higher court. The latest news is that the girls have been removed from the custody of their abductors and placed in a state-run women’s shelter pending a decision on their custody.
Here’s the latest from Asia News:
Kidnapped girls, converted and married by Muslims, entrusted to assistance center- - - - - - - - -
The two girls, aged 13 and 10, are staying at a shelter for women only. The move was decided by the High Court, ahead of the ruling on August 4, when their fate will be determined. Support for the family from Catholics.
“The decree of the judge so far is so good, that is why we and the girls’ family felt relieved” ahead of the hearing on August 4. This is the satisfied comment of Peter Jacob, secretary of the Pakistani Catholic commission for justice and peace, on the decision by the judge Saghir Ahmed, of the Multan Bench of Lahore High Court, to entrust the two Christian sisters kidnapped by a group of Muslims to the care of a state-run women’s shelter.
Since Tuesday, July 29, Saba Younas, 13, and her sister Anila, 10, have been safe from their captors: the girls were kidnapped last June 26 in the village of Chowk Munda, in the province of Punjab, where they had gone to visit their uncle, Khalid Raheel. In the days following their kidnapping, the kidnappers revealed that the two girls had converted to Islam, and that the older of them had married one of the sons of the kidnappers. In court, moreover, both father and son stressed the “girl’s complete willingness to contract marriage”.
Saba and Anila’s family have been able to count on the concrete help of the commission for justice and peace, and on the support of the entire Catholic community in the country, beginning with legal assistance and the covering of court costs. The trial was adjourned until August 4, when the judge will have to rule on the possible — and hoped for — return of the two sisters, still minors, back to their home.
Peter Jacobs emphasizes the importance of the latest judicial provision, which removed the girls from the Muslim clan: in this way, they can spend a little time alone, and, above all, safe from the physical and psychological influence exercised by the kidnappers. “By order no one can meet the girls in government-run women’s shelter”, the activist affirms, “and during this time the girls would have the good enough time to think upon the entire situation”. He also expresses “optimism” in view of the hearing next Monday, but says the fight will not be over if the ruling is not favorable.
A couple of weeks ago, judge Mian Muhammad Naeem, of the district of Muzaffargarh, ruled that the two Christian sisters “converted to Islam in a legitimate manner”, and for this reason, they cannot be “restored to their family of origin”. Rejecting their father’s request for custody of his daughters, the judge also admitted the “validity” of the marriage between the girls and the two Muslims.
What’s encouraging in all of this is the solidarity and courage of the Christian community in Pakistan. According to the latest figures I have, Pakistan is about 96% Muslim. I’m not sure how many of the remaining 4% are Christians — there is a Hindu community in Pakistan — but their numbers are large enough to have an effect.
If they remain steadfast in their demand for justice, and if there are any honest and fair-minded judges within Pakistan’s judicial system, the two girls may yet be returned to their father.
Hat tip: C. Cantoni.
5 comments:
doctor --
That grotesque level of discourse is generally offensive and unacceptable here, as well as being off-topic.
Sigh, Baron. Why did he bother calling himself "doctor", I wonder.
Christians "standing up" to Islamic "law"--and they are a minority in Pakistan...
I admire their courage and am looking for the same from Christians here in the U.S.
Christian leaders-where are you?
Where are the Christian leaders? They're busy having kumbaya meetings with Muslim imams in which they bend over backwards to treat them with respect while making absolutely no demands for even common decency toward Christians in Muslim countries.
The Archbishop of Canterbury apparently thinks his job is to promote Islam and sharia in Britain, not speak for Christians persecuted in every Muslim country.
Meanwhile, the Pope was cowed after speaking the truth about the violence inherent in Islam was met with violent attacks by Muslims around the world including killing a nun. Thought he was made of tougher stuff than that. His predecessor took on a totalitarianism along with Reagan and Thatcher and came out on top, despite an assassination attempt on his own life.
Why doesn't Benedict repeat and repeat until the world press is forced to report it that Muslims are given religious equality in western nations but no Muslim country gives non-Muslims reciprocal respect?
Post a Comment
All comments are subject to pre-approval by blog admins.
Gates of Vienna's rules about comments require that they be civil, temperate, on-topic, and show decorum. For more information, click here.
Users are asked to limit each comment to about 500 words. If you need to say more, leave a link to your own blog.
Also: long or off-topic comments may be posted on news feed threads.
To add a link in a comment, use this format:
<a href="http://mywebsite.com">My Title</a>
Please do not paste long URLs!
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.