A culture-enricher in Harlem got a bit annoyed with the behavior of another customer in line at his local supermarket. After being thrown out of the store, the irate enricher returned with his trusty razor to set matters straight.
Note: This incident has a Mohammed Coefficient of 100%.
According to The New York Post:
New York: Maniac Slash Attack in Supermarket Meat Aisle
A crazed man made a Pathmark meat aisle extra bloody this morning when he plunged a knife into an elderly shopper’s neck, allegedly after the perpetrator stepped on the victim’s foot, police and store employees said.
Abdullah Mohammed, 51, of 125th Street, was at the Harlem supermarket yesterday morning when he started arguing loudly at the customer service desk with William Perry, 70, a former truck driver. Perry was at the desk buying Lotto tickets when Mohammed stepped on his foot, irking the older man, according to his older brother, Charles Perry.
Mohammed, who was clad in a peach linen suit, was booted out of the store, but stormed back in minutes later and cornered Perry in the meat aisle, two employees said. He then allegedly whipped out a razor and slashed Perry across the neck.
“People ran out of the store. One guy was screaming, ‘Oh my God, I’ve never seen anything like this,’” said Rafael Feliciano, a repairman who witnessed the melee.
A heroic store employee tackled Mohammed and subdued him until the police responded to the meat aisle melee, cops said. Mohammed was dragged out of the supermarket screaming “at everyone around him,” Feliciano said.
Mohammed was arrested and charged with assault in the first degree. Perry was taken to Harlem Hospital and was likely to survive his injuries, police said.
“He’s a coward and … didn’t fight fair,” Charles Perry said from his brother’s hospital bed.
For a complete listing of previous enrichment news, see The Cultural Enrichment Archives.
Hat tip: AC.
13 comments:
Assault in the first degree? Hogwash. "Plunging a knife" in somebody's neck surely merits attempted murder.
Dear Baron, I am confident that you are aware of how most Muslim males are, as a matter of course, obliged to carry forth the name of Mohammad ("ham" & "mad" featuring prominently) in their own proper appellation.
Should this change your "Mohammed Coefficient" by one whit? Please permit me to cough and choke for whatever reason seems best.
Qur'an 8:12:
"[Remember] when your Lord inspired to the angels, "I am with you, so strengthen those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip."
Qur'an 47:4:
"So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of Allah - never will He waste their deeds."
I'm sure the knife to neck thing is a skill most Muslims are being taught in the mosque.
We shall judge them by their fruits.
Oh yes, we shall.
With thoughts and eventually with bullets.
Dear Randian,
Yes.
Attempted murder.
With the aggravating circumstance of religion.
For randian and goethechosemercy:
Yeah, as if the New York pigs or FedPigs are about to go there.
Of course it is practically impossible to get a concealed carry permit in NYC or anywhere else in the State of New York. People must be kept defenseless lest they violate the acceptable norms of cultural enrichment.
Well, really!
I stand correct out of my naivety.
I see there's no hope of co-existence or cooperation with these islamics.
EVERYTHING will set them off!
"there's no hope of co-existence or cooperation with these islamics.
EVERYTHING will set them off!"
including your foot being under their foot apparently...and your having the nerve to object.
“He’s a coward and … didn’t fight fair,” Charles Perry said from his brother’s hospital bed.
He's a coward.
That pretty much says it all.
Muslims attack old men, women, and children with abandon and call it holy.
About the only thing they respect is another man stronger than themselves.
We generally think of these types of people as Bullies. And in that vein we consider Bullies to be cowards.
I just wanted to state that the Proposition Nation is perfectly viable.
That isnt to say that the Ethno-State has its advantages.
The key is that the Proposition isnt that you dont assimilate and colonize the place. But rather that there is a culture, in the case of the US and other Anglo Nations (Canada, Australia), that culture is Anglo-Saxon British European Christian culture. Different races and ethnicities dont have to be the problem that they can be, of course different religions may be problematic (especially Islam), which should be denied all applications to immigrate. But other than that, we cant have this multicularalist cultural and moral relativism, non sense. Anti-discrimination laws should be scaled way back to reinstituted freedom of association, and also informal discrimination for the purpose of enforcing cultural norms should not be frowned upon. This worked in the past for the US, however since the 60s Left, things have changed.
That isnt to say that Europes history of Ethno-States arent also good models, especially with their historicality and still highly homogenous populations. That gives them certain advantages, no doubt. But that doesnt mean that the Proposition Nation is non-viable. The Proposition Nation with current Leftwing Multiculturalism which is hostile to the host population, enforcing its indigenous population and culture's accomodation of all others and newcomers. That certainly is a recipe for balkanization, colonization, violence, conflict, failure and dissaster.
Missed the debate, so I thought Id comment on the topic, if not the side track onto Jewry.
Good point, Escape Velocity:
America was a Proposition Nation from Day One, but it handled the problems of PC MC (blacks and Injuns) relatively rationally for a good century and a half. So how does Fjordman explain that? The bad seed was there growing for 150 years, but didn't manifest itself until the 1950s?
And to compare the Gnostic disease of the French Revolution with America with hardly any leeway for contrast is simply too indiscriminately reckless for me to take Fjordman seriously, however tectonically interlocking and complex are his voluminous analyses.
P.S.:
When I wrote that "America was a Proposition Nation from Day One" I was not using that term ("Proposition Nation") seriously, of course.
Blaming PC MC on the Founding Fathers' vision of America is analogous to blaming Christianity for PC MC, without taking into account a good 1000+ years during which Christians were quite politically INcorrect about how they handled the Muslim problem. When that painted-in corner draws nigher, the analyst tends to get more complex.
Post a Comment