This is the real stuff, the full monty, a big barrel of pure unadulterated one hundred proof Islamic supremacist moonshine, served out for everyone to see and hear:
How come he doesn’t get arrested for “inciting religious hatred”?
Yes, I know, I know. That was a rhetorical question.
I understand the rules in Modern Multicultural Britain all too well. There are two sets of them: one for Muslims, and one for everyone else
Hat tip: Vlad Tepes.
24 comments:
Where and when did this speech take place?
I suggest that everyone on the planet forward this video to each of the U.S. Congress critters.
Here are the contacts for the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate.
Make sure U.S. Senator Peter King (NY) gets a copy, for his upcoming hearings on Islamic extremism.
Send a copy to FBIHQ and each FBI field office. You will find the addresses here:
http://www.fbi.gov/contact-us
Submit the YouTube URL to FBI's IC3 (Internet Crime Complaint Center).
Include the MEMRI link, if Vlad Tepes has it handy.
Indicate that it could be considered as a threat to UK Prime Minister David Cameron's life...
...and to all Western civilization.
In hoc signo vinces
"One time, Omar Ibn Al-Khattab saw some woman, and she was dressed inappropriately. What Muhammad did... No, I'm sorry what Omar Ibn Al-Khattab did... He went up to her, and he hit her. He hit her. He said to her: 'How dare you walk in the streets of Al-Madina, which belong to the Prophet Muhammad, dressed the way you are dressed?' She turned around and said to him: 'Who the hell are you to tell me to dress like this?!' Do you know what he said? 'I am the Emir of the Believers.' But today, we can't go around slapping every woman in the street. We cannot do that. It is not allowed for us to do that."
Obviously a reference to the recent rape-jihad cases in the UK if I know mainstream UK party politics these cases will be turned 360-degree to blame the chaotic and decadent lifestyle of the indigenous peoples, particularly targeting the underclass thats how it works in the UK. The question is were these rape-jihadists getting to close for comfort to middle class areas.
In hoc signo vinces
@Freyja's cats,
If anyone is going to send anything I think Drone coordinates would be more appropriate.
If anyone wants to read a novel that takes a long, hard look at the PC, multi-culti mindset that's ripped through British society like an intellectual diahorrea bug, they could do worse than check out Stephen Leather's latest: 'Rough Justice'. (Available from Amazon.)
@ 4Symbols:
Not a bad idea.
Jives with my suggestion to include time and place.
its obvious to anyone with any sense that we are being invaded by a culture and religion that is wholly inimical to Western values and belief systems. I can remember when our country was almost wholly British during the 60s, in fact, in Sheffield where I was bought up,it was rare to see an Asian and when you did it was a novelty. People seem to forget that this situation has only occured over the last 40 years.
Forty years !
It's unbelievable that our country has changed into the stinking multicultural hellhole it has now become. There were voices telling us what to expect (Enoch amongst them) but to our lasting shame we ignored them, vilified them and destroyed them. When I say "we" I mean the majority of well meaning but ultimately clueless citizens of our country and I am ashamed to say I was amongst them.
Well, no more !
Part of the reason that people resist the BNP is because they know on some level they have been duped, lied to, indoctrinated and conned by the PC/Multicult drones. These people are suffering from what in sales terminology is classed as "Buyers Remorse" or the older term "Caveat Emptor".
Under the doctrine of caveat emptor, the buyer could not recover from the seller for defects on the property that rendered the property unfit for ordinary purposes. The only exception was if the seller actively concealed latent defects or otherwise made material misrepresentations amounting to fraud.
Nobody likes to admit they have been conned and most people will seek any method to rationalise thier loss - including blaming the messenger (BNP).
However, the fraud that has been perpetrated upon the British people is of such a magnitude and has such far-reaching consequences that people will have no choice but to acknowledge they have been sold a product with life-threatening potential and with the potential to destroy thier own civilisation and culture.
Fortunately, we have for the moment, a working Parliamentary Democracy and this is about the only means we have to seek redress.
I suggest to anyone who reads this that that they use thier vote to kick out the charlatans, confidence tricksters, thieves and liars who are infesting all levels of our society and to totally replace the systems being used to undermine our very existence as a race and a nation.
Because if you don't there are only two alternatives left, war or surrender.
For us in the BNP surrender is NOT an option.
Its your choice
Sorry guys, this video does not contain anything which incites hatred or violence.
The speaker is careful to couch his words in spiritual and political terms. There is no way that "attack the system" could be read forensically in terms of violence.
Think for a moment in terms of some fundamentalist Christian preaching. Throughout most of the 20th Century, many especially working class preachers would have used almost exactly the same diagnosis and solution to society's ills. Replacing, mutatis mutandis, Islamic ideas with a particularist Christian one.
Think about the Victorian temperance movement's approach to alcohol, for example.
We may not agree with that speaker, but his jihad is spiritual. We really need to watch out for the ones who employ the Prophet's (physical) sword!
Deportation is not the death penalty nor is it permanent internment. The deported radical islamist can continue with his religious views and practices in his country of origin.
Quote:
There is no way that "attack the system" could be read forensically in terms of violence.
end quote.
I'm laughing very, very hard at this one.
There is the context of the message and the context of the source. Both indicate that this is rhetorical violence that incites physical violence.
Abu Mounisa is Exactly Right on a reciprocal bearing. This is what WE should be doing - Attack"alIslam" at the roots once it goes beyond "what church you attend." Make NO Compromises with it and arrest/deport its "bully boys" without exception or mercy. Sir Oswald Mosley spent most of the War in HM's Prisons - why is this man walking the streets of London? Dr. Shalit
Let's see: the speaker tells a story about a prominent Muslim slapping a woman he doesn't even know because he doesn't like her dress. It is obvious from the context that he approves. Then he adds that today, we cannot slap every woman dressed "immodestly." Then, immediately after that, he talks about fighting the system and the laws, including democracy and freedom. If this man has his we will have a culture in which men can slap women on the street. This is terrifying.
Quote:
Let's see: the speaker tells a story about a prominent Muslim slapping a woman he doesn't even know because he doesn't like her dress.
end quote.
Because Islam is so perfect as a faith, and because the ummah is so perfect as a society, and because men are so much more perfect than women and children, and because Muslims are so much more perfect than infidels, the average Muslim man is entitled to slap any woman on the street he doesn't like.
And no, it's not a matter of modesty or immodesty.
It's all personal as far as women are concerned.
Quote:
If this man has his we will have a culture in which men can slap women on the street. This is terrifying.
end quote.
If you know that you stand against this, you've taken your first step in resisting it.
Note that he did not say anything about having left any visible marks. Islam does not allow this. Of course, if she is all covered up, any marks you DO leave are not visible.
This is only the beginning. The violence has not really begun.
Thank you so much for postint this video, it helps me spread the message of the threat that Islam imposes for this country
My apologies...Pardon the typo. I meant to type 'U.S. Representative Peter King,' whose website is here.
It may do some good to send this to video to our clueless congresspeople. However, the reaction one usually sees from the typical multi-culti, brainwashed, well-educated citizen is that Abu Mounisa is just part of the radical fringe of Islam. I wish I could think that this video would be more effective.
Our well-meaning liberal friends are quite willing to admit that there is a problem with "radical Islam" but they are ignorant about (and prefer to be ignorant about) the nature of Islam and Muslim communities, in the United States as well as in Europe and elsewhere. So our "outreach" efforts to educate them must take this into account. One example which they consider to come from a "radical" will not begin to convince them.
Watchful-
Absolutely right. I often send links or post videos on my Facebook page to my clueless Leftist friends. And the reply (if I get any at all) is invariably the same. "It is just a tiny minority". But I will keep on posting and linking. Maybe the sheer volume of horros that Islam supplies on a daily basis will one day burrow into their thick heads. If not? At least I tried.
I appreciate your comments.
These people are in thrall to the belief of cultural relativism. This belief seems to underly multiculturalism and even political correctness.
There are many creative people who view this blog and many people who, I hope, have lot more time than I do to devote to the counterjihad. It seems to me that we need written and video pieces--in various media venues--that hack away at this ridiculous belief (cultural relativism) with special emphasis upon Islamic cultures, practice and teachings.
I shared this vid with some leftist feminists, and was surprised that about half of them made anti-sharia comments, and only half made the usual comments that Christians want to do the same. 50/50 among leftist women is awesome.
I feel things are moving in the right way. Don't write off feminists just yet, a great video like this will enlighten anyone who has an intact personality.
"Watchful" above took the words out of my mouse.
I was going to respond to "Freyja's cats" who wrote:
I suggest that everyone on the planet forward this video to each of the U.S. Congress critters.
As "Watchful" said, it won't do any good, because this one Muslim speaker will be instantaneously labelled a part of the TMOE -- the Tiny Minority of Extremists who have hijacked Islam. Their very existence provides an emblematic buttress for the unfounded but powerful axiom that, as President Bush used to put it, "the vast majority of Muslims are moms and pops like the rest of us".
In fact, the more that PC MC majority sees Muslims like this -- and worse, sees Muslims actually exploding and gunning people down (as with the Ft. Hood shooter) -- the more their TMOE Axiom is strengthened. So sending our Representatives (whether Dems or Repubs, it matters little) this video will only reinforce their current view, which continues to suffer the signs & symptoms of that curious mental illness called the DCD (Dot-Connection Deficiency).
P.S.:
My new blog (as my blog of 6 years has been, apparently, mysteriously "removed"):
Lemonade
VIDEO IN SPANISH:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1QmDoB_nxI&feature=player_embedded
Post a Comment
All comments are subject to pre-approval by blog admins.
Gates of Vienna's rules about comments require that they be civil, temperate, on-topic, and show decorum. For more information, click here.
Users are asked to limit each comment to about 500 words. If you need to say more, leave a link to your own blog.
Also: long or off-topic comments may be posted on news feed threads.
To add a link in a comment, use this format:
<a href="http://mywebsite.com">My Title</a>
Please do not paste long URLs!
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.