The office of the public prosecutor in the Netherlands reports that it has released the two Yemenis who conducted a “dry run” terrorist attack on a flight from Chicago to Amsterdam. Despite a blithe official assurance that the men are no longer considered suspects, a number of troubling issues have been left uninvestigated and unresolved.Our Flemish correspondent VH has translated the public announcement, and follows it with his own commentary and analysis:
Two Yemeni men released by Dutch prosecutor
The two Yemeni men who had been detained since Monday on the suspicion of possible involvement in the preparation of a terrorist crime, were released tonight [afternoon, September 1]. Both men were arrested after the American authorities had informed the Netherlands on the fact that suspect goods were found in the luggage of one of them. This luggage was intercepted by the American authorities and remained in the U.S. In a preliminary test in America in addition to this, a possible presence of a trace of explosives was determined on an item of the luggage goods. However, both men were at that time already were en route to Schiphol airport, in transit to their destination Sanaa (Yemen).
The information provided to the Dutch authorities was so serious that it was decided not to take any chances. Following this, the men were questioned and then arrested. Also their luggage was then confiscated. There subsequently has been intensive research in the U.S. and the Netherlands, in which very close consultations took place between the police and judiciary in both countries. During this investigation, the luggage in the U.S. has been examined further, several addresses have been searched, and people have been interviewed. Furthermore, in the Netherlands the hand luggage was examined, traces secured in the aircraft, and the suspects extensively questioned.
Both the research in the U.S. and the research in the Netherlands showed there were no more indications for the possible involvement of men with any punishable offense. With more accurate tests conducted in the U.S., no presence of an explosive substance has been determined. Also, after further research, the goods found in luggage have not been determined suspect.
Since there have been no indications found to support the initial suspicion, there is no reason for holding the men any longer, and they are no longer considered suspects.
VH adds further information, analysis, and commentary:
- - - - - - - - -
The two were allowed to board at O’Hare airport in Chicago, despite the security already had concerns over Ahmed Mohamed Nasser al-Soofi (48). When it appeared the man was on a different flight from his luggage, this caused alarm. The flight with his luggage on board had to turn back, so that these could be taken off the plane. [source]Later, the two freely boarded a flight to another airport [flight UA 908 to Amsterdam], where they were arrested [at arrival, according to Het Parool: “at row 25 a younger man (Hezam al-Murisi, 37) and one older man (Ahmed Mohamed Nasser al-Soofi, 48) were handcuffed and taken away,” which indicates they may well have been seated close or next to each other]. “If it is true that the luggage left without a passenger, something has gone wrong. That is not allowed according to the international rules,” safety expert Edwin Bakker of the Clingendael Institute said. “This does not look good. This should be well looked into.” Also sources among the Dutch authorities consider it somewhat troubling that their American counterparts seem to have acted in such a manner. They question the security operation in the United States. “A flight may never leave the gate when the owner of the baggage is not on board. Something did not go well there.” [source]
One of the two men arrested at Schiphol [Hezam al-Murisi] was not only suspected of preparing terrorist attacks but also of arson. His lawyer Klaas-Arjen Krikke confirmed this Tuesday. [source]
“…Tuesday evening however, it slowly became clear that American intelligence no longer had suspicion any against the men. For example, they did not even know each other and one of them had missed his flight. This was the reason that he was not in the same aircraft as his luggage.” [source]
The Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf reports:The two Yemenis who were released Wednesday after they had been detained since Monday on suspicion of terrorism, have been greatly damaged. This is the conclusion of Klaas-Arjen Krikke, the lawyer for one of the two [Hezam al-Murisi]. “They have been put down world wide by name as terrorists. […] But my client is very happy that he has been released,” says Krikke. “He hopes soon to be with his family again. But what has happened here will not win the beauty prize. In particular, the Americans are responsible for that. Scandalous! […] My client seemed to have nothing to do with the suspected suitcase. That was absolutely clear. Yet he became involved with the whole mess,” the Dutch lawyer stressed. “I must say however, that the prosecution and the police in recent days have worked very hard to clarify the matter quickly. But the Public Prosecutor (OM) has had the courage to weigh the information honestly and then release the suspects.”
The two men will continue their trip to Yemen on Thursday (September 2). [source]
This article was published earlier today at Big Peace.
6 comments:
“A flight may never leave the gate when the owner of the baggage is not on board. Something did not go well there.”
While this is a perfectly understandable policy and one that is reasonable on its face, what happens when it is applied to those for whom reason has no meaning?
as Dymphna noted in the "Confronting Ignorance About Islam’s Political and Theocratic Utopia" thread:
People cannot be reasoned out of beliefs which Reason had little part in forming.
Nor can reason be transposed upon a framework − cultural, spiritual, legal or otherwise − wherein it had no original role. Arbitrary trumps reason every time. No amount of logic or rationalization can provide a workaround for this basic fact.
Far too many Muslims have no compunction about destroying themselves just so long as a sufficient number of unbelievers perish at the same time. How then, is an ostensibly reasonable policy of matching checked luggage to boarded passengers going to be of any use?
This is a principal issue and one that challenges the very foundations of Politically Correct thought and how it informs current anti-terrorist policy creation.
It is morally void to transpose a Western love of life onto individuals whose background specifically imbues them with an admiration for and total lack of fear concerning death.
Time and again it has already been demonstrated that Western values just do not apply with respect to Islamic culture. No amount of wishing it otherwise or simple artifice can magically superimpose these accepted cultural normatives onto Islam.
Far more destructive is how legal measures have been put in place to ensure that the foregoing and wholly invalid cultural superimposition takes place.
Much as with the Flying Imams case, this was another terrorist probe whose explicit intention was to further disable even more of the protective measures already in place.
Not just questionable behavior − as with the Flying Imams − but now, even highly suspicious articles of an appearance identical to terrorist apparatus, were deemed insufficient reason to detain or charge individuals of clearly questionable background and destination.
It is pertinent to import an excerpt from a comment in GoV's "The Pepto-Bismol Bombers" thread:
Sean O'Brian: So to sum up: the more somebody fits the stereotypical profile of a terrorist the more wrong it is to assume that they are a terrorist and, consequently, take measures to stop them from committing acts of terrorism. The fact that there was strong evidence that this guy was planning to blow up the plane only increased the need to let him go. This is how a Yemeni man could get away with potentially life-threatening actions that you or I could not.
As I also noted:
It is as if moral inversion has become a virtue.
In this, the new measure of "true" tolerance is its ability to tolerate the intolerable.
This is the equivalent of demanding that because nothing can be perfect, all things must be intentionally imperfect.
It is as if a vaccine that demonstrates 100% effectiveness is, somehow, in violation of nature and must be replaced with one less perfect in order to meet these lower standards that have now been adopted as the normative paradigm.
Total moral inversion is attained when suicide becomes the standard of perfection.
Haven't the Dutch seen the video of what happens in Canada? Muslims are not checked AT ALL! nUMBERS OF WOMEN SWATHED HEAD TO TOE IN BLACK NOT EVEN GLANCED AT LETA LONE ASKED, MEN WITH BEARDS AND LONG WHITE NIGHTIES WALKING THROUGH CUSTOMS UNIMPEDED!
So maybe they have adopted that method in the US now.
Whose turn is it to have a major terrorist attack? The US has submitted and so has Britain!!
Quote: " For example, they did not even know each other and one of them had missed his flight."
Au contraire - a Detroit news station had a story with passengers on the plane that said the men were laughing and joking like they were old friends.
Another paper confirms: Both of the detained men are friends who lived and worked in Dearborn.
hmmmm, my comment posted and then disappeared. . .should the prior phantom comment re-appear, kindly accept my apologies.
Quote: "…Tuesday evening however, it slowly became clear that American intelligence no longer had suspicion any against the men. For example, they did not even know each other and one of them had missed his flight. This was the reason that he was not in the same aircraft as his luggage.” [source]"
Au contraire:
a Detroit news station had a story which reported passengers on the plane said the men were laughing and joking like they were old friends.
And another paper confirms Both of the detained men are friends who lived and worked in Dearborn.
heroyalwhyness is having trouble getting comments to "take" -- has tried several different workarounds and no luck. IIRC, other commenters, including Zenster, have had trouble with Blooger gobbling the words right up. Wish I believed it would do any good to complain.
I am going to go so far as to look in their "Known Problems" area to see if the gods & godettes on Mt. Olympus have noticed our tiny bleats of wailing down here...
---------------------
Here are heroyal's observations. Let's see if my effort takes on this:
Quote: “…Tuesday evening however, it slowly became clear that American intelligence no longer had suspicion any against the men. For example, they did not even know each other and one of them had missed his flight. This was the reason that he was not in the same aircraft as his luggage.” [source]
Au contraire: A Detroit news station had a story which stated passengers on the plane said the men were laughing and joking like they were old friends.
Another paper confirms Both of the detained men are friends who lived and worked in Dearborn.
Okay, it took. Though it claimed it didn't...
I did do a preview first. Don't know if that made any difference of if it was the various propitiations I made on the Blooger altar...
Post a Comment
All comments are subject to pre-approval by blog admins.
Gates of Vienna's rules about comments require that they be civil, temperate, on-topic, and show decorum. For more information, click here.
Users are asked to limit each comment to about 500 words. If you need to say more, leave a link to your own blog.
Also: long or off-topic comments may be posted on news feed threads.
To add a link in a comment, use this format:
<a href="http://mywebsite.com">My Title</a>
Please do not paste long URLs!
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.