To make this little news tidbit even more piquant, a Muslim student who objected to having Mr. Abdul-Basser as his chaplain felt it necessary to request anonymity when voicing his opinion to the newspaper.
With her kind permission, I reproduce Diana West’s post from last Wednesday on this topic:
Sharia Creep in Harvard Yard- - - - - - - - -
by Diana West
From the Internet to the media, slowly: Yesterday’s Harvard Crimson carried a story on the Harvard Islamic chaplain’s support for capital punishment for Muslims who leave Islam as revealed in an email the chaplain “allegedly” wrote. (We’re still at “allegedly” — although no one, including the chaplain, has disputed the authorship of the email.) I posted the story here on April 4. What caught my eye in this week’s Crimson story was the “clarification” flagged at the bottom of the following Crimson paragraph:“I believe he doesn’t belong as the official chaplain,” said one Islamic student, who asked that he not be named to avoid conflicts with Muslim religious authorities. “If the Christian ministers said that people who converted from Christianity should be killed, don’t you think the University should do something?” [SEE CLARIFICATION BELOW]
Scrolling down, I found it:
CLARIFICATION: The April 14 article “Chaplain’s E-mail Sparks Controversy” included a quotation from a named Harvard student, who was later granted anonymity when he revealed that his words could bring him into serious conflict with Muslim religious authorities.
Got that? For opposing death for apostasy, for opposing the Islamic chaplain’s continued tenure based on said chaplain’s support for death for apostasy, a Harvard Muslim student felt compelled to call up the Crimson to seek post-publication anonymity to avoid coming into “serious conflict with Muslim religious authorities.“
This isn’t the Swat Valley. This isn’t Taliban-controlled Afghanistan — or, for that matter, Karzai-controlled Afghanistan. This isn’t Iran. This isn’t Iraq. This is what sharia creep looks like in America…in Harvard Yard.
So it takes a Muslim student at Harvard to notice that the rules are different for Christians than for Muslims.
But that’s not news. It’s a “Dog Bites Man” story.
Yawn.
1 comment:
Until things went totally upside down with footbaths in American airports, turning hospital beds toward Mecca 5X/day in the U.K., car-b-ques unchallenged in the Parisian ghettos, etc. I used to agree somewhat with the idea that allowing antiwestern civilization types freedom to rant BECAUSE THEN everyone would understand just how crazy they are and antithetical to our shared cultural norm. This would cause shunning by the mainstream and humiliation to the subject. Unfortunately, this has not turned out to be true. IMO we have a majority of Western population literally sleepwalking through society, unaware of the damage to their culture and way of life. We also have a very strong minority that actively supports the sea change in society under some misguided sense of fairness or, some reason more suspect than simple stupidity.
Then there is the poor Muslim fellow who speaks up for western values and has to do so anonomously... Absolutely pathetic.
Post a Comment
All comments are subject to pre-approval by blog admins.
Gates of Vienna's rules about comments require that they be civil, temperate, on-topic, and show decorum. For more information, click here.
Users are asked to limit each comment to about 500 words. If you need to say more, leave a link to your own blog.
Also: long or off-topic comments may be posted on news feed threads.
To add a link in a comment, use this format:
<a href="http://mywebsite.com">My Title</a>
Please do not paste long URLs!
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.